Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Taxi Driver Online Please Forgive me for being somewhat cyni
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1543
Page 15 of 16

Author:  JD [ Mon Mar 14, 2005 7:29 am ]
Post subject: 

Gateshead Angel wrote:
The administrators of this site have admitted to contating councils, offering the M&R document and subsequently published lists, they claim however that they have NOT claimed to have published "on our behalf" but at best they imply that it was all compiled by us, even if the final document was written by them.


We know you and your two sidekicks live in a Walter mitty world Mr Angel because we have supplied ample evidence to that effect, so perhaps Mr Walter Mitty you can provide the evidence that TDO has supplied lists and M&R to councils and stated it was compiled on behalf of subscibers to TDO? Because if you can't, I for one will be asking TDO to ban you for life.

You lying, miserable, toad.

JD

Author:  Guest [ Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

TDO wrote:
For example?


TDO. It would seem from JD's unasked for reply that he knows exactly where I'm coming from. My own personal opinion is that his influence on this site is the seed of corruption that a good site does not need.

I wish you luck and good fortune with this forum, but I feel that a partnership with this devil is too high a price to pay for anyone to succeed.

If you lose the trust of your members you lose their loyalty. There is nothing I have seen about JD that imbues me with trust. You, yourself should beware the Ides of March.
....MrT....

Author:  Yorkie [ Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

captain cab wrote:
Quote:
The people would be better off coming on here, to find Tory policy than on there!

there you get labour policies repackaged


Sorry to disagree yorkie but the way the most of the country see that we have a conservative government in already, its new name is new labour.

the principles of the labour movenment were sold on many years ago, its all about profit, its no longer service.

we dont build things, we build call centres, even then we usually use a labour market from abroad that is cheaper.

american express......i'd rather walk

(yes, style council quoted again)

Captain cab


Bloody hell!
you disagree with me in such a way that I cannot argue!

well done, I aggree

Author:  TDO [ Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:29 pm ]
Post subject: 

MR T wrote:
TDO wrote:
For example?


TDO. It would seem from JD's unasked for reply that he knows exactly where I'm coming from. My own personal opinion is that his influence on this site is the seed of corruption that a good site does not need.

I wish you luck and good fortune with this forum, but I feel that a partnership with this devil is too high a price to pay for anyone to succeed.

If you lose the trust of your members you lose their loyalty. There is nothing I have seen about JD that imbues me with trust. You, yourself should beware the Ides of March.
....MrT....


Who wrote that one then Mr T :lol:

Author:  Guest [ Mon Mar 14, 2005 9:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

TDO wrote:
MR T wrote:
TDO wrote:
For example?


TDO. It would seem from JD's unasked for reply that he knows exactly where I'm coming from. My own personal opinion is that his influence on this site is the seed of corruption that a good site does not need.

I wish you luck and good fortune with this forum, but I feel that a partnership with this devil is too high a price to pay for anyone to succeed.

If you lose the trust of your members you lose their loyalty. There is nothing I have seen about JD that imbues me with trust. You, yourself should beware the Ides of March.
....MrT....


Who wrote that one then Mr T :lol:


TDO..I have told you before about your Assumptions.....mrT...

Author:  TDO [ Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

Oh yes, that was when you said:

GOOD LAD IS DEREK [Cummins], fights for the trade out in the open not like some,who only whisper in the shadows. but then again some mothers do have then..........love mr T

Leaving aside your hypocrisy over anonymity, I said:

By the way, why am I not surprised that you're an admirer of Mr Cummins

You replied:

You and your assumptions,you don't half make me laugh.
mr T........


I couldn't work it out then, but since you know cast doubt about my 'assumptions' again, perhaps you could explain it.

Author:  Guest [ Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:49 am ]
Post subject: 

TDO..explain what...that you make me laugh...mrT... 8)

Author:  Guest [ Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:34 am ]
Post subject: 

Am i missing the point of this topic?
Is it all a big wind up and am i the only fool that is taking this seriously.
Is it april the 1st yet?

Author:  TDO [ Tue Mar 29, 2005 6:58 pm ]
Post subject: 

Gateshead Angel wrote:
This site is in place to front an attempt by a "specialist" taxi solicitor to convince every council that he can give them advice, at a cost, that will increase their revenue and get them out of trouble with the DfT, even though they aren't in any trouble in the first place.


Gateshead Angel wrote:
I believe that the claims made within this website are defamatory, some of the claims made within M&R are equally questionable.


Gateshead Angel wrote:
If you don't believe me then take the matter further, this site is influenced by a solicitor who claims to be a specialist in TAXI matters, Nidge uncovered this parasite and was promptly banned.


Gateshead Angel wrote:
I'll tell you what this person has done Sussex, he has seen how much consultancy work is undertaken by a person with more trade knowledge but less qualifications and guessed how much he could make from that.
Then you add into the equation the "forming a policy which will withstand legal challenge" argument.

You see Sussex this bloke is telling councils that he will assist them in forming policies which will stop the need for court cases, claiming that his costs are lower than if the council had to defend either policy in court.


OK, you've had around a month to provide evidence to substantiate your allegations, and not a shard of evidence so far, as readers will have noticed.

You have 48 hours to provide the evidence or these false and defamatory allegations will be deleted.

Author:  Yorkie [ Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

There are documents flying around e-mail slots, obviously dusty its felt you are part of the conspiracy.

I have warned you several times.

bugger of it is if you want to see a taxi expert in your eyes you have to have an accident at football!

and who is to judge this evidence?

yep the coconspiritor!

can Mick choose the arbitrator?

how about Nige? he would be as neutral as you?

or JD?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

jd says he doesnt exist! his office says he does!

Author:  TDO [ Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:11 pm ]
Post subject: 

But it's the wrong DS, that's why there's no evidence.

Phone him again and ask.

Author:  Sussex [ Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:12 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think asking people, who have been given weeks and weeks, to front up within 48 hours is reasonable.

Then they can tell the world about it, unlike the trade mags, that we were promised.

After the 48 hours they can put it up on TTF Lie, and those that believe a word of what Nigel and the Angel :^o say, can debate on there to their hearts content.

And we can carry on without them. \:D/ \:D/

Author:  Yorkie [ Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

Dusty,
you are beginning to sound like a manic salesman from BT

for gods sake I dont want to speak to the man, hes only just crawled off his sick bed!

As John said I cannot afford him, hes bloodywell right, what I need is a one handed solicitor, cos they all say one one hand.........but on the other.

I will leave him to our council to appoint.

Author:  TDO [ Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

Don't you mean from Toucan telecom :lol:

But you seem to be keeping on missing the point, which is why I keep on trying to tell you the facts.

That solicitor has nothing to do with the site or the trade.

Author:  Sussex [ Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

TDO wrote:
That solicitor has nothing to do with the site or the trade.

Solicitor? :shock:

What's all this about a solicitor? :lol: :lol:

Page 15 of 16 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/