Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 12:21 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Private Hire drivers 'stung' in police operation against illegal trade


THREE private hire drivers have been fined after plying for trade on the streets in Stoke-on-Trent.

They were arrested as part of a joint operation between Stoke-on-Trent City Council and Staffordshire Police in Hanley on the evening of July 30 last year.

Prosecutor Trevor Vernon, representing the city council, yesterday told North Staffordshire Magistrates' Court in Newcastle that private hire drivers can only pick up a pre-booked fare, whereas hackney carriage drivers can be flagged down in the street.

Mr Vernon said undercover officers got into Patrick Dickman's private hire vehicle in Trinity Street, Hanley, in the early hours of July 31.

"They asked if he was booked. He replied 'No' and they asked him to take them on a journey," said Mr Vernon.

Dickman, aged 45, of Badgers Croft, Red Street, Chesterton, pleaded guilty to driving a carriage or plying for hire when not licensed as a public hackney carriage.

The father-of-three, a licensed private hire driver with Newcastle Borough Council, was fined £130 and ordered to pay £180 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

Alison Downs, mitigating, said Dickman, of previous good character, had been under a lot of stress.

She said: "Quite a lot of taxi drivers were stung in the operation that evening."

Atta Mohammed, aged 34, of Dibden Court, Honeywall, Stoke, a licensed private hire driver with the city council, took two undercover officers to Etruria's Moat House Hotel.

He pleaded guilty to plying for hire without a hackney carriage licence and was fined £145 with £180 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

Miss Downs said: "When approached he said he was free, they got in and the rest is history. Money was tight, he saw a fare, he took the business.

"Some evenings drivers can be sat around waiting for a fare for three hours."

And Mohammed Pervez, aged 36, of Suffolk Road, Lightwood, also pleaded guilty to plying hire without a hackney carriage licence on July 30.

Officers asked him if he was booked. He said he wasn't so they asked him to take them to the Borough Arms, Newcastle.

The married father-of-five was fined £150 with £180 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

Councillor Joy Garner, who chairs the city council's licensing and registration panel, said the authority is determined to stamp out plying for hire among the city's 1,400 private hire drivers.

She said: "This is taking trade away from our 153 hackney carriage drivers, who invest a lot of money in their purpose-built cars and ensuring they are fully compliant with licence conditions.

"We are targeting the plying for hire blackspots in Transport Lane, Longton; Tower Square, Tunstall; Trinity Street, Hanley; and Pickford Place, Meir.

"Private hire drivers who repeatedly loiter there are summoned to appear before my panel, where they can have their licences suspended."

source: http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/news/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
I'm shocked at the low level of the fines.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
The way the trade is at the minute that could be a Saturday nights takings

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:49 pm
Posts: 1331
Location: Midlands
captain cab wrote:
I'm shocked at the low level of the fines.

CC


No IN10's for no insurance?? There's a lad round here who didn't renew his badge last year and was still driving, the Council found out and took his pants down, 35 offences of driving without insurance, he was fined nearly £700 and banned from driving for 1 year.

_________________
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Image
Believe me, don't get Mercury X2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
I'm shocked at the low level of the fines.

Based on income.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
I dont really think income comes into it,it goes from magistrate whatever sort of day there having.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
blackpool wrote:
I dont really think income comes into it,it goes from magistrate whatever sort of day there having.


I think you might find the chap from sussex may know a little more than yourself.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
blackpool wrote:
I dont really think income comes into it,it goes from magistrate whatever sort of day there having.


I think you might find the chap from sussex may know a little more than yourself.

:roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
The fine is based on the drivers' earnings.... that is why they are asked to provide proof of earnings.... I thought everybody knew that :wink:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24392
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
MR T wrote:
The fine is based on the drivers' earnings.... that is why they are asked to provide proof of earnings.... I thought everybody knew that :wink:


id get a rebate then.....whooohoooo

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
MR T wrote:
The fine is based on the drivers' earnings.... that is why they are asked to provide proof of earnings.... I thought everybody knew that :wink:


How is this so then ?I have been to court on plenty of things, and never provided proof of income.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
blackpool wrote:
MR T wrote:
The fine is based on the drivers' earnings.... that is why they are asked to provide proof of earnings.... I thought everybody knew that :wink:


How is this so then ?I have been to court on plenty of things, and never provided proof of income.


TBH, given this weeks performance in front of the select committee, and the strong liklihood of nationwide national legistlation, I think the most pertinant thing you can tell people in Blackpool is actually to join a national body that will fight their corner.

That isnt the mob you lot are currently attached to either.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
Okay I am a hackney and as such I generally have no sympathy with P.Hs!

But! is it not about time that the authorities took on board the fact of life that the companies that charge them to find work do not have enough work for them, and that is the main reason for the drivers doing what they are doing!

To stop them (the companies) just taking on drivers to line their own pockets regardless, companies should be made (as a condition of license), to justify, taking on additional drivers by proving that they can give them at least a liverable income for each driver @ a 40 hour working week.

If the P.Hs get caught after that, then throw the book at them.

If the companies disregard the rules....shut them down.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
blackpool wrote:
MR T wrote:
The fine is based on the drivers' earnings.... that is why they are asked to provide proof of earnings.... I thought everybody knew that :wink:


How is this so then ?I have been to court on plenty of things, and never provided proof of income.


If you don't provide proof of income, you tend to get shafted when it comes to a fine.....

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
cabby john wrote:
Okay I am a hackney and as such I generally have no sympathy with P.Hs!

But! is it not about time that the authorities took on board the fact of life that the companies that charge them to find work do not have enough work for them, and that is the main reason for the drivers doing what they are doing!

To stop them (the companies) just taking on drivers to line their own pockets regardless, companies should be made (as a condition of license), to justify, taking on additional drivers by proving that they can give them at least a liverable income for each driver @ a 40 hour working week.

If the P.Hs get caught after that, then throw the book at them.

If the companies disregard the rules....shut them down.


Every PH drivers dream. Let the companies prove they have the work available for the drivers they take the money from :wink: You're quite right tho the vast manority of pirates are doing it because they are sitting around waiting for work

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 881 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group