Taxi Driver Online :: View topic - can dundee city be held responsible for this

maybe tone u could answer this.

we all agree that dcc are putting on far to many plates

mycab wrote:

maybe tone u could answer this.

we all agree that dcc are putting on far to many plates

That's because Tone and the rest of Dad's Army did'nt vote for option one ! Now..if anybody should be held responsible for the mess in the Trade is surely must be DTA/Unite ! The plates will keep on coming until they accept that 100% is the only way to advance the Trade.

Can't understand why members pay dues to the above mentioned, only to find their chosen Trade in further disarray ??

Please enlighten us Sassenachs; what is / was Option 1 and what are / were Options 2, 3, 4 etc.?

they would have to bring back saloons

Because it's a driver's choice to over rank or park illegally. :wink:

A taxi can still ply for hire while driving around legally.

am just curious doers any one understand aiden

skippy41 wrote:

they would have to bring back saloons

They already have them....they're called Private Hire

gusmac wrote:

Because it's a driver's choice to over rank or park illegally. :wink:

A taxi can still ply for hire while driving around legally.

unfortunatley not the case for what u say as u cant ply for hire on dual carrige way ,

Author:	mycab [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:12 am ]
Post subject:	can dundee city be held responsible for this
maybe tone u could answer this. we all agree that dcc are putting on far to many plates ,so why hasnt anyone acussed them of conspiriey as in by over ranking and making drivers commit an ilegal act as in parking on double yellow lines or even on the urban clearway or even acusse them of aidin and abetting along the same lines ? just a thought meaning no smarta*se comments

Author:	gusmac [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:50 am ]
Post subject:
Because it's a driver's choice to over rank or park illegally. A taxi can still ply for hire while driving around legally.

Author:	tx_op [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:13 am ]
Post subject:	Re: can dundee city be held responsible for this
mycab wrote: maybe tone u could answer this. we all agree that dcc are putting on far to many plates That's because Tone and the rest of Dad's Army did'nt vote for option one ! Now..if anybody should be held responsible for the mess in the Trade is surely must be DTA/Unite ! The plates will keep on coming until they accept that 100% is the only way to advance the Trade. Can't understand why members pay dues to the above mentioned, only to find their chosen Trade in further disarray ??

Author:	Brummie Cabbie [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:28 am ]
Post subject:	Re: can dundee city be held responsible for this
tx_op wrote: mycab wrote: maybe tone u could answer this. we all agree that dcc are putting on far to many plates That's because Tone and the rest of Dad's Army did'nt vote for option one ! Now..if anybody should be held responsible for the mess in the Trade is surely must be DTA/Unite ! The plates will keep on coming until they accept that 100% is the only way to advance the Trade. Can't understand why members pay dues to the above mentioned, only to find their chosen Trade in further disarray ?? Please enlighten us Sassenachs; what is / was Option 1 and what are / were Options 2, 3, 4 etc.?

Author:	tx_op [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:01 am ]
Post subject:	Re: can dundee city be held responsible for this
Brummie Cabbie wrote: Please enlighten us Sassenachs; what is / was Option 1 and what are / were Options 2, 3, 4 etc.? http://www.dundeecity.gov.uk/dundeecity ... n_2296.doc

Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

can dundee city be held responsible for this http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16897	Page 1 of 1

Author:	skippy41 [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:36 pm ]
Post subject:
If option 1 was adopted and a member of the public asked for a saloon cab, as they could not get into the WAV option, the council could have been held responsible for neglecting the needs of the disabled that cannot get into them Allegedly under the new equality bill there has to be a mixed fleet to cater for all alleged at 50/50, so if an all WAV fleet was introduced back then, they would have to bring back saloons

Author:	tx_op [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:44 pm ]
Post subject:
skippy41 wrote: they would have to bring back saloons They already have them....they're called Private Hire

Author:	mycab [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:13 pm ]
Post subject:
gusmac wrote: Because it's a driver's choice to over rank or park illegally. A taxi can still ply for hire while driving around legally. unfortunatley not the case for what u say as u cant ply for hire on dual carrige way , am just curious doers any one understand the full meaning of conspiracy or aiden and abetting

Author:	tx_op [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:
mycab wrote: am just curious doers any one understand aiden Dunno...ask a doer anyhow... Thought he took Russian lessons when he went to Spartak Moscow

Author:	skippy41 [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:52 pm ]
Post subject:
tx_op wrote: skippy41 wrote: they would have to bring back saloons They already have them....they're called Private Hire But you cannot hail or get one off a rank (allegedly)

Author:	gusmac [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:42 pm ]
Post subject:
mycab wrote: gusmac wrote: Because it's a driver's choice to over rank or park illegally. A taxi can still ply for hire while driving around legally. unfortunatley not the case for what u say as u cant ply for hire on dual carrige way , Are all Dundee's streets dual carraigeways? BTW, you can respond to a hail on a dual carraigeway, unless signs state otherwise (clearway etc) Anyway, legally speaking, the choice to over rank or park illegally is made by the driver and the driver alone. He commits the offence. Nobody makes him. He can continue to drive around, it's his own choice to stop and break the law.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/