Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Defamation
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17389		 Page 1 of 5
Author:  ALI T [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Defamation
Quote:
Anyone involved in the publication of the words will be liable unless they can establish a defence.

A defence can be for the defendant to show that although defamatory its words were published pursuant to the discharge of a public duty (e.g. reporting suspicion of a crime to the authorities) and are thereby privileged from suit but such a defence is vitiated if the claimant can show that the words complained of were published with malice. It is a defence for the defendant to show justification, meaning substantial truth of the words complained of.


oh dear
raymond mackie
of mussleburgh

unfortunately your objection contains no truths :wink:

you should really get your facts right before you put pen to paper.

expect a letter shortly after I've dealt with the licensing matter.

btw you cant object to my wifes application,and then quote the reasons for objection as me :lol: :lol: :lol:


dearie me! only her indoors can do that :lol: :lol: :lol:
Author:  Skull [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:06 pm ]
Post subject: 
Who the fu*k is,

Quote:
Raymond mackie
of mussleburgh




:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:
Author:  ALI T [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:54 pm ]
Post subject: 
Skull wrote:
Who the fu*k is,

Quote:
Raymond mackie
of mussleburgh




:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

someone who's none to bright :roll:

the council must have been chuckling away at this idiots ramblings :lol: :lol: :lol:
Author:  Jasbar [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 4:26 pm ]
Post subject: 
That'll be the trade adding 2 and 2 and making 22 again then. Another Bob Dewar moment. Another schoolchild mentality who doesn't understand the process.

Al;l this proves is the old adage that you don't have to be bright to be a cabbie.

That's why the Skull and I have always denied beiong to any status called cabbies. After all, who would want to be associatwed with dimwits like we have in our trade.

:roll:
Author:  ALI T [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:39 pm ]
Post subject: 
maybe its an east lothian thing(no offence skull) :lol:

dougie stays doon that way, perhaps its infectious
Author:  Sussex [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
Things are so much simpler down here.

No one can object.
Author:  ALI T [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:22 pm ]
Post subject: 
this dumbo thinks its a petition

perhaps he should try reading (learning how to)
then try reading the appropriate legislation relating to it.
and last but not least ...........get to the post office in time. :oops:

your objection is not only to late ,lacks substance or truth,but you have the cheek to tell the council that the reason for the lateness is you didn't know how to go about it :lol: :lol: :lol:

how long did it take for you to finally figure out that you write a letter to the council objecting ...a month :lol: :lol:

how many edinburgh cabbies does it take to write a letter....
it would be funny if it wasn't so true
Author:  Skull [ Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
ALI T wrote:
Skull wrote:
Who the fu*k is,

Quote:
Raymond mackie
of mussleburgh




:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

someone who's none to bright :roll:

the council must have been chuckling away at this idiots ramblings :lol: :lol: :lol:


This guy is a tool of the highest order. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Author:  ALI T [ Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:26 am ]
Post subject: 
yep gonna take a libel action against him :wink:
doesn't matter if i win or not :lol:
it will cost him plenty to defend it.
wonder if he will still feel righteous after his wallets a lot lighter :wink:
Author:  Skull [ Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:29 am ]
Post subject: 
ALI T wrote:
yep gonna take a libel action against him :wink:
doesn't matter if i win or not :lol:
it will cost him plenty to defend it.
wonder if he will still feel righteous after his wallets a lot lighter :wink:


If He's got a property, you're on to a winner. :shock:
Author:  ALI T [ Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:35 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
i wish to formally object to the application lodged by jacqueline turnbull on 23 June 2011.

the reason for my objection is that they have in recent years been granted 3 taxi operators licenses which have then been sold.
they have publicly announced yesterday on the website tdo that again this license will be sold.

it is my belief that anyone who fits the councils criteria should be issued a license,however i don't believe this should be for profit by selling the license.

i apologize for the late lodging of of this objection but i was unaware of how to do this.
i hope the committee will consider this late objection.
i would apprieciate of you could acknowledge receipt of this late objection.

yours sincerely
raymond mackie
2 delta avenue
mussleburgh


what a halfwit :lol: :lol:
Author:  Dusty Bin [ Thu Aug 18, 2011 1:00 am ]
Post subject: 
ALI T wrote:
yep gonna take a libel action against him :wink:
doesn't matter if i win or not :lol:
it will cost him plenty to defend it.
wonder if he will still feel righteous after his wallets a lot lighter :wink:


What's the defamation, precisely?
Author:  ALI T [ Thu Aug 18, 2011 1:38 am ]
Post subject: 
the application is in my wifes name

she has not had an operators license

comet commercial has had 2

1278 taxi's had one

in other words there is not an ounce of truth in it
Author:  ALI T [ Thu Aug 18, 2011 1:40 am ]
Post subject: 
cant remember saying i would sell it on here on the 27th july even if i could as the application isn't mine
Author:  Jasbar [ Thu Aug 18, 2011 1:40 am ]
Post subject: 
Dusty Bin wrote:
ALI T wrote:
yep gonna take a libel action against him :wink:
doesn't matter if i win or not :lol:
it will cost him plenty to defend it.
wonder if he will still feel righteous after his wallets a lot lighter :wink:


What's the defamation, precisely?


No defamation. In fact what this guy is saying is that Mr Turnbull is one astute businessmans who recognises an opportunity and capitalises on it.

Pity that our government gurus don't have as much commercial nounce.

Anyway, how can the council uphold any objection when all that's happening is that the Turnbull's are simply playing by the rules the council established all by itself.

if the council don't like what is happening with plates, then it knows what to do. perhaps this moron may be the trigger for the council to see sense and end all of the grief that's been coming their way for years, by de-restricting.

BTW Like with Dewar's objection, this one shouldn't even get before the committee. If the rules of process are not adhered to, the it shouldn't even come before the committee. That such flawed complaints do come before the committee betrays just how incompetent this council is. Either that or its so corrupt that it wonb't allow its unelected officials to exercise any judgement.

:roll:
Page 1 of 5 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/