ALI T wrote:
You mean Alan Gladstone, his Travis alter ego allowing him to be the most obsequious cretin in Christendom
What Travis is telling us is that his pals on Central's committee are running scared.
Just imagine what losing this contract would mean for them?
Imagine the repercussions when the bewildered in the company can't trot along and hand their money to the council?
The thing that surprises me is that this is supposed to be a social work contract?
That right?
So, how is it that councillors are swanning all over the place enjoying the discount fares for social work?
Shouldn't their contract be wholly separate from the social work contract?
Or is it that their contract is deliberately kept with contract terms that require WAV facilities to prevent non WAV businesses from tendering? Isn't that an unfair contract condition by the council? And, is this even legal?
Remember, this isn't a general council contract. It is supposed to be specifically social work.
I suggest that the council are once again at it here. It strikes me that this is another example of the intrinsic corruption in all matters taxis and council.
We really do need a public inquiry here.