Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 6:50 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Taxi driver knife-threat man behind bars


A crown court recorder has ruled that a man who bought a chopping knife in a Worcester shop and brandished it at a victim in a nearby alleyway was not a danger to the public.

Dean Ludlow bought the five-inch kitchen blade in Lakeland after he had spotted a taxi driver he had been in dispute with over payment of a fare.

He pulled the knife from a sports bag and threatened the cabbie with it but was seen by a bar owner who gave evidence at Ludlow’s trial.

He was convicted last year by a jury of possession of a blade in Broad Street on October 3 and locked up on remand.

Ludlow, aged 40, of Deerhurst Close, Severn Stoke, had 140 offences on his criminal record including knife crimes, said Nicholas Smith, prosecuting.

In June 2006 he stabbed a man in the stomach and slashed the victim’s brother across the face, causing a four-inch gash.

He was jailed for two years and his prison licence was extended to three years.

Four years earlier, police found a lock knife on him in a public street after a search. He was fined £75.


But Recorder John Steel QC concluded that he was “not dangerous within the meaning of the legislation” and gave him a 40-week jail sentence, suspended for 12 months, with 150 hours of unpaid community work.

He warned Ludlow, who had already spent 133 days in custody awaiting sentence, that a further knife crime could result in an indeterminate jail term.

Ludlow’s previous convictions included eight of violence against people, one involving a firearm, four of fraud and 77 thefts, Worcester Crown Court was told.

At trial he insisted he pulled out the knife in Worcester because he feared he was going to be attacked.

But the recorder told him: “You have used a knife in the past and demonstrated a propensity for violence.

“It’s clear there was no evidence of any threat towards you.

"You deliberately purchased the knife before making threats in the street to a totally innocent man.

“You have a violent nature fuelled by drugs.”

Charles Hamer, defending, said Ludlow had served many years in jail which had not had the effect of rehabilitation.

He had a record going back to 1986 but wanted to address his offending and turn his life around.

Mr Hamer said he now faced an appearance before magistrates in Birmingham over a £2,763 confiscation order made in 2003.

Ludlow, who had already served three months in jail in connection with the order, was remanded back into custody.

http://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/963 ... hind_bars/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:30 pm 
Another one needing shooting.

This is what happens when you allow lefty right on'r's run your world, I bet there's some bleedin heart out there who will say.....he's not a bad man he's just......


Makes me frickin sick how they are pandered to fueling the attention nodes in their brain, well the ones that aren't already taken by class A anyway.


When things get sorted in a few hundred years time ppl will look back and think oh my god how could anyone live through that, 1990 - 20?? is like living during the plague.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
A crown court recorder has ruled that a man who bought a chopping knife in a Worcester shop and brandished it at a victim in a nearby alleyway was not a danger to the public.

:sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:53 pm 
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
A crown court recorder has ruled that a man who bought a chopping knife in a Worcester shop and brandished it at a victim in a nearby alleyway was not a danger to the public.

:sad:



Baffeling isn't it, do you think some one got at the judge, like went round and threatened to do for his missus and kids, just like the profile of the man says.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
Doom wrote:
Baffeling isn't it, do you think some one got at the judge, like went round and threatened to do for his missus and kids, just like the profile of the man says.

I certainly don't think someone got at the judge, even if he is only a glorified QC, but he has got it wrong, and some innocent person is going to suffer for the mistakes made by the QC in court. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:02 pm 
Sussex wrote:
Doom wrote:
Baffeling isn't it, do you think some one got at the judge, like went round and threatened to do for his missus and kids, just like the profile of the man says.

I certainly don't think someone got at the judge, even if he is only a glorified QC, but he has got it wrong, and some innocent person is going to suffer for the mistakes made by the QC in court. :sad:


Sadly so, but they'll get over it (sarcasm directed at failed leagal system) I can't see how it's going to improve, it strikes me position is purchased and nobody with a logical mind is able to penetrate the secret circle, which looking at it's actions, one would be forgiven for thinking criminals are now running it and using the law to absolve themselves.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Sussex wrote:
Doom wrote:
Baffeling isn't it, do you think some one got at the judge, like went round and threatened to do for his missus and kids, just like the profile of the man says.

I certainly don't think someone got at the judge, even if he is only a glorified QC, but he has got it wrong, and some innocent person is going to suffer for the mistakes made by the QC in court. :sad:


I'm sure the decisions would be different if the consequences of letting people go because they are not deemed a danger to public, when they clearly are, land back at the feet of the people who so misjudged these characters

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
if i hear "I have turned my life around" one more time ill scream.....

same old/same old

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 435 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group