Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Alex Salmond refuses to back Parliament's report
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=19167
Page 1 of 1

Author:  captain cab [ Wed May 02, 2012 8:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Alex Salmond refuses to back Parliament's report

Phone hacking report: Alex Salmond refuses to back Parliament's report

Alex Salmond yesterday moved to block a parliamentary inquiry into phone hacking in Scotland after refusing to endorse a report by MPs that concluded Rupert Murdoch is not a “fit person” to run his media empire.



Image
Rupert Murdoch and Alex Salmond during the opening of News International's Eurocentral printing plant in Motherwell in 2007 Photo: PA

The First Minister rejected a united call from the leaders of the three main opposition parties for MSPs to investigate the extent of hacking north of the Border, arguing it was not necessary.

Evidence has emerged this week that both the mobile phones of Jack McConnell, his predecessor as First Minister, and Joan McAlpine, his parliamentary aide, were hacked by the now defunct News of the World.

But Mr Salmond yesterday refused to back a report by the Commons culture, media and sport committee that said Mr Murdoch demonstrated “wilful blindness” to the extent of the criminal activity in News Corporation.

Tom Watson, a Labour MP at the forefront of the Westminster inquiry, said Holyrood should follow suit and Tommy Sheridan was wrongly convicted of perjury during his defamation action against the News of the World.

SNP ministers now face a political battle to prevent one of Holyrood’s committees investigating phone hacking or the parliament’s business bureau setting up a new body to conduct an inquiry.

This would pile even more pressure on Mr Salmond, who has been struggling to justify being the world’s only political leader still enjoying a close relationship with Mr Murdoch.

E-mails disclosed to the entirely separate Leveson Inquiry last week showed he offer to lobby the Government for the media tycoon’s takeover of BSkyB “whenever” his News Corporation empire wanted.

The Westminster committee was split six to four in favour of Mr Murdoch being “unfit” to run News Corporation, with the Tory members refusing to back this conclusion and branding it “partisan”.

Mr Salmond refused even to say whether he backed this conclusion, arguing that Mr Murdoch should not be judged by politicians and this should be left to “independent authorities”.

“In terms of the suggestion of a separate Scottish inquiry, the Scottish justice system does not need any lectures from Tom Watson, who seems unaware of the fact that the Leveson Inquiry includes Scotland within its remit, and the fact that a Strathclyde Police special unit are currently investigating allegations of criminality in Scotland,” he said.

Mr Salmond’s spokesman refused to confirm whether his phone was also hacked, saying that he would make this clear during his appearance next month at the Leveson Inquiry.

But opposition parties said he is also accountable to the Scottish Parliament and he should agree to an investigation by MSPs into his links with Mr Murdoch “in the interests of full transparency”.

Willie Rennie, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader, said: “In the last few days we have learned that phone hacking reached the very top of government in Scotland. It is right and proper that the Scottish Parliament has the opportunity to look into the phone hacking scandal in its own way and in its own time.”

Johann Lamont, the Scottish Labour leader, accused the First Minister of a cover-up, adding: “While Westminster has had an inquiry into Murdochs and phone hacking, Salmond blocks the Scottish Parliament from having one.”

Ruth Davidson, his Tory counterpart, said Mr Salmond has “a duty to be accountable to the Scottish Parliament.”

One of Holyrood’s existing committees could stage an inquiry into phone hacking, but Mr Salmond can easily block this because SNP MSPs hold a majority on them all.

The alternative is the parliament’s business bureau, which includes a representative from the four main parties, agrees to set up a new body to investigate phone hacking in Scotland.

Unveiling the Commons report, Mr Watson said he was writing to Mr Salmond to argue for an investigation into the hacking of Lord McConnell’s phone while he was First Minister and “how and why (other) MSPs were targeted”.

He said Sheridan was jailed for three years by a jury “not in full possession of the facts” and Mr Murdoch should order an urgent review of the information News International provided to the court.

Mr Salmond initially dismissed e-mails showing he was willing to lobby for the media mogul as “chatter”, but then claimed his actions were motivated by a desire to protect jobs and not the Scottish Sun’s decision to back the SNP.

However, he has failed so far to produce evidence of how the BSkyB takeover would have helped the Scottish economy.

Jeremy Hunt, the Culture Secretary who was expected to rule on the bid, has confirmed Mr Salmond's office made repeated requests to set up a telephone conversation.

Author:  gusmac [ Wed May 02, 2012 8:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alex Salmond refuses to back Parliament's report

Nice innuendo piece from the torygraph CC
No link to it though [-X
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... eport.html

Quote:
Mr Salmond refused even to say whether he backed this conclusion, arguing that Mr Murdoch should not be judged by politicians and this should be left toindependent authorities”.

“In terms of the suggestion of a separate Scottish inquiry, the Scottish justice system does not need any lectures from Tom Watson, who seems unaware of the fact that the Leveson Inquiry includes Scotland within its remit, and the fact that a Strathclyde Police special unit are currently investigating allegations of criminality in Scotland,” he said.

Mr Salmond’s spokesman refused to confirm whether his phone was also hacked, saying that he would make this clear during his appearance next month at the Leveson Inquiry.


I think the real questions here are:

How impartial can any politician of any persuasion be when it comes to Murdoch?
They've all sucked up to him at one time or another, and which amongst them haven't had their phones hacked?

How many inquires are needed about the same thing?
And how many more make it a witch hunt?

Author:  captain cab [ Wed May 02, 2012 8:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alex Salmond refuses to back Parliament's report

gusmac wrote:
Nice innuendo piece from the torygraph CC
No link to it though [-X
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... eport.html

Quote:
Mr Salmond refused even to say whether he backed this conclusion, arguing that Mr Murdoch should not be judged by politicians and this should be left toindependent authorities”.

“In terms of the suggestion of a separate Scottish inquiry, the Scottish justice system does not need any lectures from Tom Watson, who seems unaware of the fact that the Leveson Inquiry includes Scotland within its remit, and the fact that a Strathclyde Police special unit are currently investigating allegations of criminality in Scotland,” he said.

Mr Salmond’s spokesman refused to confirm whether his phone was also hacked, saying that he would make this clear during his appearance next month at the Leveson Inquiry.


I think the real questions here are:

How impartial can any politician of any persuasion be when it comes to Murdoch?
They've all sucked up to him at one time or another, and which amongst them haven't had their phones hacked?

How many inquires are needed about the same thing?
And how many more make it a witch hunt?



sorry I missed the link.....I thought I'd added it tbh.

I think you're right, and I dont blame Salmond for his cosing up to murdoch, I do perhaps think he should have chosen someone else in the a team :lol:

:wink:

Author:  gusmac [ Wed May 02, 2012 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alex Salmond refuses to back Parliament's report

‘Hypocritical’ Labour slammed over failure to act on phone hacking

Wednesday, 02 May 2012 06:32
By G.A.Ponsonby

The Labour party has been accused of "hypocritical humbug" over the phone hacking scandal after party MP Tom Watson demanded an inquiry be set up by the Scottish Parliament.

SNP MP Pete Wishart slammed Labour for failing to act when in power, despite two Labour Prime Ministers being made aware of possible illegal practices within the British newspaper industry as far back as 2006.

The calls for another inquiry follow new revelations that the home and mobile phone numbers of SNP MSP Joan McAlpine may also have been hacked by the News of the World.

A Committee of Westminster MPs has used the scandal to issue a report claiming Rupert Murdoch "is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company". The Committee split along party lines with Labour and the Lib Dems condemning the media tycoon.

The report has also been used in order to launch another attack on First Minister Alex Salmond, with Unionists questioning Mr Salmond's judgement and demanding the Scottish Parliament hold its own separate inquiry into the phone hacking scandal.

However in a statement issued today, Pete Wishart slammed Labour’s record on phone hacking and pointed out that the party, who were in power at Westminster and Holyrood, sat on their hands when confronted with evidence of widespread criminality in 2006.

Mr Wishart, the SNP Home Affairs spokesperson said:

“This is hypocritical humbug from Labour. The whole phone hacking scandal happened on their watch and they chose to do absolutely nothing about it.

“Glenn Mulcaire’s notebooks were seized well before the SNP won the election in 2007. Labour were in power both at Westminster and Holyrood at that time.

“They were clearly content to let phone hacking take place and the privacy of Joan McAlpine and others be violated. They could have chosen to uphold the law, but manifestly failed to do so.

“Bizarrely, they failed even to warn Jack McConnell that his phone appeared to have been hacked. He seems only to have been informed recently – years after this allegedly took place.”

Mr McConnell revealed this weekend that he had been contacted in February by Strathclyde Police and warned that he may also have been a victim of phone hacking.

In December last year, the Leveson inquiry was told that in 2003 the authority in charge of pursuing data protection breaches refused to act despite well-known newspapers being suspected of breaking the law, because they were “too big”.

The claim was made by Alec Owens, an ex-senior investigating officer for the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). According to Mr Owens, the Operation Motorman investigation uncovered documentary evidence showing a clear paper trail all the way and a possibility of many criminal convictions.

Motorman uncovered evidence of over seventeen thousand requests made by journalists to private investigator Steve Whittamore; many of the requests would have required breaking the law.

Mr Owens said: "We could identify the newspaper, the journalist, Whittamore, who he used, the blaggers, the corrupt people, and we had a paper chain right the way up and down,"

In November 2006, the then Labour government were eventually presented with the findings of the Operation Motorman report that catalogued over 3000 breaches of data protection laws. However despite the tough recommendations in the report, no action was taken by Prime Minister Tony Blair, nor by Gordon Brown’s administration which took over a few months later in June 2007.

In 2006 Sir Richard Thomas wrote in his annual report to the Westminster Parliament:

"Much more illegal activity lies hidden under the surface. Investigations by the Information Commissioner's Office and the police have uncovered evidence of a widespread and organised undercover market in confidential personal information. Such evidence formed the core of the report, detailing how the unlawful trade in personal information operates: who the buyers are, what information they are seeking, how that information is obtained for them, and how much it costs.

"Among the ultimate 'buyers' are many journalists looking for a story. In one major case investigated by the ICO, the evidence included records of information supplied to 305 named journalists working for a range of newspapers."

Pete Wishart said the whole episode, and the new revelations, left many unanswered questions and added:

“This begs questions about what Gordon Brown knew at the time he was Prime Minister. If he did, know why did he not tell such a close political colleague as Jack McConnell what was going on? And if he didn’t, then why was he so woefully out of touch?

“It is only since the Crown Office asked Strathclyde Police last year to investigate the Scottish end of this grubby affair that these revelations have come to light.

“For years, Labour have tried to bury this scandal. It is now returning to haunt them.”

The Motorman report was not handed to Scotland Yard until June of last year. The report showed hacking was widespread and journalists were paying police thousands of pounds for information.

Sources said 300 emails show clear proof of criminal offences with a group of six journalists acting as ‘gatekeepers’ to private investigator Glen Mulcaire, who carried out hacking on a huge scale.

Mr Mulcaire was also found to have the mobile telephone number of Tommy Sheridan in his posession along with Mr Sheridan’s private pin codes.

Some emails seem to suggest there was clearly evidence of serious crime with senior journalists paying substantial sums of money to police officers.

http://www.newsnetscotland.com/index.ph ... ne-hacking

Author:  Private Reggie [ Wed May 02, 2012 10:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alex Salmond refuses to back Parliament's report

Murdochs empire moves north, Apply within :D :D :D

Author:  captain cab [ Wed May 02, 2012 10:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alex Salmond refuses to back Parliament's report

yeah.....scots politicians are as corrupt as their english brethren.

cant wait to vote for the corrupt b*stards tommoz.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/