Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 11:47 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
North Norfolk cabbies issue warning after council passes fee hikes


A decision to hike taxi fees across north Norfolk has been hailed as “unfair” and prompted warnings they will drive cabbies off the roads.

The cost of applying for and renewing a driver’s licence and vehicle licence is set to increase after North Norfolk District Council’s licensing committee rubber stamped the changes.

Compulsory medical exams are also set to be introduced along with a controversial three-year licence, which the council was keen to see all drivers sign up to.

But after outcry from cabbies, who said the longer-term licence would price new drivers out of the trade, members agreed to continue to provide a 12-month permit.

The concession however did little to quell the concerns of drivers who attended today’s (Monday) committee meeting.

Ashley Colman, chairman of the North Norfolk Taxi and Private Hire Association - which was formed in a bid to get the fee increases thrown out - said members’ decision was “disappointing” and drivers had hoped the increases could be deferred for further consultation.

“Most of us have been told by staff, particularly part timers, if this goes ahead and they have to pay out for medicals, they’re not going to renew,” he added.

“The part time drivers are the back bone to the work we do. Evenings and weekends would suffer and companies would be shutting the doors at 6pm leaving people struggling to get backwards and forwards.”

Under the changes the cost of applying for a one-year permit will rise from £102 to the likely fee of £170 in three annual increases up to 2014. Over the same time period the cost of renewing a vehicle licence will go up from £138 to £190.

Mr Colman, who owns Anglia taxis based in Sheringham, said fees had been hiked annually since 2004 but in that time there had only been three fare increases and added: “It is very important to us that we keep our part time drivers. They don’t earn the sort of money they feel they could pay these fees.”

But the council said the increased fees have been brought in to make taxi licensing “cost neutral” so tax payers would not be subsidising the process.

If drivers decide to swap to a three-year permit the drop in administration is expected to generate a “surplus” which the authority said would be re-invested within the licensing department - and could result in fees later coming down.

Members also moved to reassure the association over changes to taxi drivers’ working policy, that are being introduced through a revised drivers’ handbook, including a new penalty points system for enforcement of minor breaches to licence conditions

Steve Hems, environmental health manager, said: “We have already had dialogue with the association and we will continue that. I can assure you we’ll look to work together, we may not always see eye to eye but it’s for the authority to set the rules.”

The hikes will be recommended to full council on May 30 and if passed will come into effect in July.

source: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/north_norfo ... _1_1384377

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 6:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Why would a 3 year badge cost more to administer than a 1 year badge?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
grandad wrote:
Why would a 3 year badge cost more to administer than a 1 year badge?



Because the council havent got a f*cking clue, like a great many more, but I bet they get a gold star in how to suspend drivers

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 2:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
grandad wrote:
Why would a 3 year badge cost more to administer than a 1 year badge?


In actual fact the article states that administration costs could come down and thus reduce fees.

It's not the cost that's being complained about so much as the fact that it would represent a greater upfront outlay, and thus would deter the part-timers who are the 'backbone' of the local trade.

By the sounds of it there'll probably be a high turnover of drivers as well, so a higher fee would act as a deterrent to them joining the trade.

It's probably also telling that although the article blabbers on about 'cabbies' and 'drivers' objecting, they only quote the proprietor of a local firm.

By the way, I've taken the liberty of moving the LC-related stuff into the other section.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 4:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
grandad wrote:
Why would a 3 year badge cost more to administer than a 1 year badge?


Our lot won't do the 3 year badge because they'll lose money on them. Over the border in Mansfield they issue a 3 year badge at a cost of £157 I think. Why issue a 3 year badge for £157 when you can extract over £350 over 3 years by issuing a yearly badge??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Dusty Bin wrote:
grandad wrote:
Why would a 3 year badge cost more to administer than a 1 year badge?


In actual fact the article states that administration costs could come down and thus reduce fees.


What time do the flying pigs land? Are they allowed to use drivers badge fees to create a surplus?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57375
Location: 1066 Country
Dusty Bin wrote:
It's probably also telling that although the article blabbers on about 'cabbies' and 'drivers' objecting, they only quote the proprietor of a local firm.

The telling quote was the deterrence of part-timers. :?

I have never met/seen/heard of a full-time driver bemoaning the loss of part-timers. [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Sussex wrote:
Dusty Bin wrote:
It's probably also telling that although the article blabbers on about 'cabbies' and 'drivers' objecting, they only quote the proprietor of a local firm.

The telling quote was the deterrence of part-timers. :?

I have never met/seen/heard of a full-time driver bemoaning the loss of part-timers. [-(


Well I certainly wouldn't, but there's a lot of owner-drivers in my manor who hire part-timers. I suspect the proprietor in question just hires more of them than most.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 927 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group