Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 5:49 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Taxi wars’ warning over radical proposals

Image
Radical proposals: There is currently a limit of 50 white plate taxis in Aylesbury town


Removing the limit on how many taxis can operate in Aylesbury could lead to ‘taxi wars’, it has been warned.

Currently, 50 white plate taxis are allowed in the area, but a national report has proposed licensing authorities lose the power to restrict taxi numbers.

In a discussion on the Law Commission’s proposed reforms, some members of Aylesbury Vale District Council’s (AVDC) licensing committee suggested if the town was flooded with taxis the quality of service would go down.

But others said the limit was ‘anti-competitive’.

Councillors also debated proposals to remove the requirement for private hires to hold three licences issued by the same authority.

The reforms were being discussed as part of a consultation by the Law Commission, which is proposing radical changes to the law.

On restricting taxi numbers, Councillor Jackie Phipps said after making Aylesbury taxis spend money to meet standards, removing the limit would be ‘like throwing them to the lions’ as they would lose cash through business going to other service providers.

Councillor Judy Brandis said: “I’m worried about taxi wars.”

Others raised concerns that such a move could ‘kill’ the Aylesbury taxi service, saying quality of service would be likely to suffer.

However, not all opposed the proposed reform.

Councillor Sir Beville Stanier said the limit creates an ‘unfair playing field’, while Councillor Steven Lambert said the situation is ‘anti-competitive’ and that taxis would survive if there was the demand for them.

The Law Commission has proposed having a national safety requirement for taxis and private hire vehicles, but some councillors were still uncomfortable with the idea of vehicles licensed outside the Vale operating in the area.

Councillor David Vick, who was concerned about standards slipping, said: “It goes completely against everything that we try and do with private hires and taxis.

“What are the standards that they are going to set? If they are not high enough we are in trouble.”

But Councillor Peter Cooper said: “If there were national mandatory standards, standards would be the same all over.”

Councillor Brandis said people would be likely to buy licenses from whichever authority sold them for the cheapest.

She said: “We might lose a lot of money over this.”

source: http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/local ... -1-4060343

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Market forces = Tory Lib Dem scum wonder how many Aylesbury DUCKS voted for them! :D

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
trotskys twin wrote:
Market forces = Tory Lib Dem scum wonder how many Aylesbury DUCKS voted for them! :D

So are Labour proposing that market forces are removed from the PH trade? Or are they scum as well?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Sussex wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
Market forces = Tory Lib Dem scum wonder how many Aylesbury DUCKS voted for them! :D

So are Labour proposing that market forces are removed from the PH trade? Or are they scum as well?


All Unions oppose Market Forces in the Taxi PH industry and therefore so will their sponsored MP's and therefore no doubt the Labour Party!

NEW LABOUR IS DEAD :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
taxis would survive if there was the demand for them.


So what happens if there is only a demand for 50 of them but there are over the required demand working the area?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
trotskys twin wrote:
All Unions oppose Market Forces in the Taxi PH industry and therefore so will their sponsored MP's and therefore no doubt the Labour Party!

NEW LABOUR IS DEAD :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Did Ked restrict PH numbers when he was Mayor? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
restriction of numbers is the old fashioned way as effective as it is at maintaining driver incomes it does not suit the consumer or the modern world. Cabbies have to adapt to survive what we need is sensible legislation that enables cabbies to do that in the modern world

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
edders23 wrote:
restriction of numbers is the old fashioned way as effective as it is at maintaining driver incomes it does not suit the consumer or the modern world. Cabbies have to adapt to survive what we need is sensible legislation that enables cabbies to do that in the modern world



Yeah, starve the b*ggers. :roll:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Sussex wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
All Unions oppose Market Forces in the Taxi PH industry and therefore so will their sponsored MP's and therefore no doubt the Labour Party!

NEW LABOUR IS DEAD :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Did Ked restrict PH numbers when he was Mayor? :?


whose KED?????????????

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 5:32 pm
Posts: 89
Location: bucks
Look that's me parked No1 on rank.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
what do you want a medal ? :D

Seriously though there is life after delimitation you just have to make sure customers are aware of the service available

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
edders23 wrote:
what do you want a medal ? :D

Seriously though there is life after delimitation you just have to make sure customers are aware of the service available

Aware of discounting ? What do you want them to be aware of ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
edders23 wrote:
restriction of numbers is the old fashioned way as effective as it is at maintaining driver incomes it does not suit the consumer or the modern world. Cabbies have to adapt to survive what we need is sensible legislation that enables cabbies to do that in the modern world


I'm intrigued, do you have any suggestions. If all cab drivers make the public aware of what services they offer and those services are roughly the same (correct me if I'm wrong) and priced roughly the same how does sensible legislation come into it? Basically if a customer gets into a cab/ph and they get from A to B safely and happily they're unlikely to ring anybody else until such time as they don't get from A to B safely or happily, the only thing that may get that customer to change supplier is a cheaper fare, but, where does it all stop?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 5:32 pm
Posts: 89
Location: bucks
....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
hamidtaxi wrote:
Look that's me parked No1 on rank.

Well you wont go hungry. :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 656 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group