grumpy wrote:
That's a rear loader is it not? I thought it passed London criteria? Or am I wrong? (again)
Perhaps, like down here, they like it up the rear.
| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| London cabbys not pleased http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20045 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | skippy41 [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | London cabbys not pleased |
http://www.voyagermpv.co.uk/node/242 London cabby's are being asked to pay up to 10K more for there potential new cab, all for 2 £100 CV joints and slightly wider front wings, all just to comply with the COF turning circle |
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: London cabbys not pleased |
skippy41 wrote: http://www.voyagermpv.co.uk/node/242 London cabby's are being asked to pay up to 10K more for there potential new cab, all for 2 £100 CV joints and slightly wider front wings, all just to comply with the COF turning circle They aren't allowed in London are they? |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: London cabbys not pleased |
Nidge2 wrote: They aren't allowed in London are they? It appears they have been mugged into doing the turning circle requirement. http://www.creweguardian.co.uk/news/988 ... uilt_taxi/ |
|
| Author: | grumpy [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: London cabbys not pleased |
That's a rear loader is it not? I thought it passed London criteria? (side access only) Or am I wrong? (again) |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: London cabbys not pleased |
grumpy wrote: That's a rear loader is it not? I thought it passed London criteria? Or am I wrong? (again) Perhaps, like down here, they like it up the rear.
|
|
| Author: | grumpy [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: London cabbys not pleased |
ooo err missus 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|