Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 6:14 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Violence towards taxi drivers sparks CCTV review


A new discussion about putting CCTV in taxis is to take place in light of a number of attacks on cab drivers in Sheffield.

Representatives from local taxi firms will meet with councillors on the licensing committee on Thursday to discuss the possibility of making it mandatory for all of Sheffield’s cab drivers to record their journeys.

A council report said: “Taxi and private hire drivers work alone, often at night and often in remote places. They also carry money and as a result are vulnerable to assault and abuse.

“Recently in Sheffield, we have encountered a number of attacks on drivers for differing reasons and with differing levels of abuse or violence. Most recently a driver was attacked and lost the vision in one eye, which will ultimately cost him his licence to drive.”

At present, 128 vehicles in Sheffield have been granted consent to install CCTV cameras, out of a total fleet of 2,224. Most of the time, recording only begins if the driver’s panic button has been pressed to indicate he or she is in trouble.

Mercury Taxis’ general manager, Dermot Griffiths, who is attending the meeting, said: “I don’t feel that CCTV is essential as generally most bad behaviour is related to drink or drugs. These people do not generally think before they act – meaning the deterrent aspect of CCTV would be useless.

“Additionally, the cost of a system that would be of sufficient quality to have the desired effect is expensive and there would be a big question as to who would be footing the bill, which would have an effect on prices.”

A standard CCTV system costs about £300, but recordings can only be saved for a limited amount of time. In licensed premises like pubs, recordings must be stored for a minimum of 31 days before they are erased or overwritten. If the same rules applied to taxis, the equipment would cost more than £500.

At the meeting, the current policy and specification will be reviewed. The present policy is that images captured must remain secure at all times, and only authorised officers from the council or police are allowed to view them. Some form of encryption and access code is required to ensure the images are secure. Also, there must be signs letting passengers know if the vehicle has CCTV installed.

Dermot said: “I personally am happy to see it stay as an individual choice, with maybe a subsidy for anyone who would like to have CCTV. During the eight years I have been general manager at Mercury Taxis – which encompasses about 10.5 million taxi journeys – I can’t think of many occasions that would have been prevented or cured by CCTV.”

The review is taking place following a pilot scheme, where 33 vehicles were installed with CCTV. Before the pilot, no drivers had approached the licensing authority requesting consent to install a camera. However, after the pilot, all 33 drivers kept the systems in their cabs.

source: http://postcodegazette.com/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Mercury Taxis’ general manager, Dermot Griffiths, who is attending the meeting, said: “I don’t feel that CCTV is essential as generally most bad behaviour is related to drink or drugs. These people do not generally think before they act – meaning the deterrent aspect of CCTV would be useless.

“Additionally, the cost of a system that would be of sufficient quality to have the desired effect is expensive and there would be a big question as to who would be footing the bill, which would have an effect on prices.”

Down here we had all this bollocks from the so-called trade reps when B&H council proposed, and adopted, a compulsory CCTV policy.

Councillors were inundated by lies and scare-mongering about CCTV, but for once they stood firm ignored the loud mouth buffoons and adopted the 100% must have CCTV policy. =D>

Did the world end when the policy was adopted? No. Were those voices supporting 100% CCTV a minority amongst the trade, as the liars and buffoons suggested? Well thankfully good old Halcrow have just given us the answer.

Whilst undertaking their latest (and let's hope the LC do their job and make it Halcrow's last) SUD survey they asked customers, and both sides of the trade, if they supported the councils compulsory CCTV policy.

In respect of customers, 449 were asked and 88.4% of them agreed with the policy.

In respect of the PH trade, 148 replies were received from the PH trade and 54.1% of them agreed with the policy.

In respect of the taxi trade, 463 replies were received from the taxi trade and 71.9% of them agreed with the policy.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Concerns over Sheffield CCTV taxi plan


video
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-so ... e-20088579

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 734 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group