| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Is Skull really a BritNat? http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20597 |
Page 1 of 7 |
| Author: | gusmac [ Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Is Skull really a BritNat? |
Since Skull's only contributions to this forum these days are to turn whatever he pleases into an attack on all things Scottish, especially Salmond, the SNP or anyone who supports independence, can we safely assume he really is a BritNat ? |
|
| Author: | Skull [ Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
gusmac wrote: Since Skull's only contributions to this forum these days are to turn whatever he pleases into an attack on all things Scottish, especially Salmond, the SNP or anyone who supports independence, can we safely assume he really is a BritNat ? A BritNat, if anything I'm the complete opposite. 
|
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
I think the duck just quacked. 
|
|
| Author: | Skull [ Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
gusmac wrote: I think the duck just quacked. Aye and it said, little tartan people love wee Eck and big Ken because they really care.
|
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
Skull wrote: gusmac wrote: I think the duck just quacked. Aye and it said, little tartan people love wee Eck and big Ken because they really care. And I thought it quacked "I hate all things Scottish, especially Salmond, the SNP or anyone who supports independence" Must be because you don't actually give a shit 
|
|
| Author: | Skull [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
gusmac wrote: Skull wrote: gusmac wrote: I think the duck just quacked. Aye and it said, little tartan people love wee Eck and big Ken because they really care. And I thought it quacked "I hate all things Scottish, especially Salmond, the SNP or anyone who supports independence" Must be because you don't actually give a shit I simply hate bullsh*t. It has nothing to do with Independence, the SNP, or any other political party for that matter. If you want to keep deluding yourself, then that's your prerogative, but once on a public forum, it's fair game. My little tartan terror.
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
Quote: Is Skull really a BritNat? I think politically skull is skeptical about politicians of all nationalities - I suppose you are following the 'britnat' line because at this time it suits your purpose gus - presumably if he was slagging off westminster (and after McShane it would be like shooting fish in a barrel) he'd be your bestest buddy? |
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
captain cab wrote: Quote: Is Skull really a BritNat? I think politically skull is skeptical about politicians of all nationalities - I suppose you are following the 'britnat' line because at this time it suits your purpose gus - presumably if he was slagging off westminster (and after McShane it would be like shooting fish in a barrel) he'd be your bestest buddy? But he's not slagging of Westminster or any of the unionist politicians, is he? Doesn't matter how corrupt they are. He's been quiet for months. Nothing said about Johann - something for nothing, the lady's not for turning, we love Trident - Lamont, Ruth yer all spongers Davidson, or any other pro union politician. Like you said yourself, some of them are just crying out for a good bashing. Skull ignores all of this and uses a thread about drink driving limits, a fairly apolitical measure which had cross party support and the backing of most Scots, to launch into his latest attack on his favourite targets. Skull says he hates all politicians, but some he hates more than others. He saves his venom for his those who oppose Westminster rule. He says little or nothing about those who support it. That makes him a BritNat, whether he likes it or not.  He quotes Churchill Quote: A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Now, and I know I probably sound like the kettle talking to the pot, but he's the one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
gusmac wrote: But he's not slagging of Westminster or any of the unionist politicians, is he? Doesn't matter how corrupt they are. So? He has consistantly slagged of politicians of all political ilks, he obviously sees scots nastys as leeches and opportunists, and he isnt a million miles away from the truth. However, Skull is a Scot, and a Scot with a vote......I fail to understand what you hope to achieve in this argument tbh. |
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
What argument? |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
gusmac wrote: What argument? Since Skull's only contributions to this forum these days are to turn whatever he pleases into an attack on all things Scottish, especially Salmond, the SNP or anyone who supports independence, can we safely assume he really is a BritNat ? |
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
Thats a question 
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
gusmac wrote: Thats a question phrased in the way of a statement
|
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
Was it really any different to this? viewtopic.php?f=12&t=20596 |
|
| Author: | Skull [ Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is Skull really a BritNat? |
gusmac wrote: captain cab wrote: Quote: Is Skull really a BritNat? I think politically skull is skeptical about politicians of all nationalities - I suppose you are following the 'britnat' line because at this time it suits your purpose gus - presumably if he was slagging off westminster (and after McShane it would be like shooting fish in a barrel) he'd be your bestest buddy? But he's not slagging of Westminster or any of the unionist politicians, is he? Doesn't matter how corrupt they are. He's been quiet for months. Nothing said about Johann - something for nothing, the lady's not for turning, we love Trident - Lamont, Ruth yer all spongers Davidson, or any other pro union politician. Like you said yourself, some of them are just crying out for a good bashing. Skull ignores all of this and uses a thread about drink driving limits, a fairly apolitical measure which had cross party support and the backing of most Scots, to launch into his latest attack on his favourite targets. Skull says he hates all politicians, but some he hates more than others. He saves his venom for his those who oppose Westminster rule. He says little or nothing about those who support it. That makes him a BritNat, whether he likes it or not. He quotes Churchill Quote: A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Now, and I know I probably sound like the kettle talking to the pot, but he's the one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Gusmac you are a mass of contradictions. You agree that politicians are virtually unaccountable, to their electorate, care little about anyone other than themselves, but still you would vote for an Independent Scotland under their control? What am I missing? 
|
|
| Page 1 of 7 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|