Last night, being a Friday, I managed a night's takings that wouldn't come anywhere near a normal poor Wednesday night.
I heard a radio interview given by Councillor Steve Cardownie, who was waxing lyrical about the benefits of the council inspired jamboree for the local economy. Apparently the council spends £1 Million on it and it allegedly brings in £27 Million for the local economy.
Now, I take issue with this.
First, when the council is cutting back in every area of local expenditure, hitting things like provision of care for the young and elderly, failing to properly maintain local infrastructure and posting huge budget deficits that we have to pay for, is it right and proper that the council, ie us, should be paying anything towards this jamboree? And does the cost of alleged £1 Million council bung include the full policing cost? The cost of clean-up? The cost of suspending tramworks for the duration and the overtime needed to be worked which is required to meet the deadlines? Isn't it likely that the £1 Million figure is just a convenient accounting number, the real cost hidden in the depths of councillors' creatively hidden policy decision costs?
Second, when Cardownie tells us of the benefit to the local community, isn't that benefit directly reaped by local businesses, principally hotels who would throw their hands up in protest at the mere mention of a bed tax to pay for it? And isn't it clear that no financial benefit accrues to the council, ie us, who invariably have to pick up the tab to clear the considerable mess created by party goers sicking up all over the place and discarding litter, presumably watched by expensive environmental wardens who allow them to do so with impunity.
Third, Cardownie lied when he failed to acknowledge that this is NOT the 20th year of this shambles. I've been a cabby marginally less than this and I can remember the halcyon days without the street party when it truly was a licence to print money for cabbies who could pick first footers up in any part of the city rather than having to travel back empty to the city centre to pick up another drunk. Truth is, I would put the start of this shambles around 1998, incepted as a prelude to the coming Millenium and Edinburgh's pretension of being an International party city. So this is just another lie perpetrated by politician Cardownie; but why am I surprised because aren't all politicians intrinsically liars.
Fifth, back to the benefit of £27 Million to the local economy. What this figure, even if it is true - and I doubt it, fails to take account of the is the skewing of public spend into a compressed three days. Folks only have a set amount to spend, so they spend it during those days rather than spread it out before and afterwards. So, we sit with our fingers up our choccy doing nothing during the famine awaiting the three day feast when we can only fit so many passengers in our cars anyway so our benefit is limited by that restriction. Hardly a real feats is it? So, over the piece, we lose out, while having to put up with the drunks who are also compressing their drinking into the same period.
Sixth, Cardownie claims the event is a success. Methinks this is just another political lie. Because the interview leaked the information that there are still tickets available. How so? And if the event was any kind of financial success, wouldn't private enterprise be tripping over itself to fund it and profit from it? Truth is, this event is just a pop concert that could happen at any time of the year, and without the unprecedented disruption it causes to the city.
However, there is a political benefit to this event. And it is how it confirms to any member of the electorate who has a wit precisely how out political system operates. because the surprising thing is that despite the fact that this event is part financed at the expense of care for the elderly and other social provision, there is not a single dissenting voice amongst our elected councillors. Each Stepford councillor trots along with the party and council line and goes along with this jamboree, while those in the electoral Wards suffer through its expense.
Let me say this again, because it is important to illustrate the quality of our government. There is no political dissent within the council, Parliament, or Westminster at the expense of this jamboree while swingeing cuts are being made to social care and health provision.
Oh, and I suppose there is also a benefit for Cardownie and his henchmen. because the elderly and infirm who are subsidising it do so in order that Cardownie and his cronies can massage their egos.
Cardownie said during the interview that he had only missed one during the 20 years is supposed to have run. I could suggest the reason for this but it wouldn't add to the argument. In any case, what he told us is that he's enjoyed having his snout in the trough for 19 years. Which just about sums up the quality of our politicians.
Vote Cardownie. So he can keep his snout in the trough.
BTW The fact he allegedly owns Private Hire licences and is largely instrumental in restricting taxi licences has nothing to do with the disdain for him depicted here. It's the fact that its the poor who subsidise his snout in the public trough.
