Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed May 06, 2026 10:36 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 26, 2013 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Boris blasted over air stats

BORIS Johnson's strategy on clean air has been slammed after a report indicated that new taxis are polluting the air more than older models.

Remote Sensing of NO2 exhaust emissions from Road Vehicles, produced by the Environmental research group at Kings College London, and funded by Defra, claims that new taxis produce more than twice the amount of deadly fumes that old cabs do.

Mr Johnson refused to license any taxis older than 15 years old in 2012 – forcing cab drivers to pay up to £40,000 for new vehicles.

But the Kings report reads: “There is a clear indication that absolute levels of NO2 emissions from taxis manufactured since around 2008 have been increasing. This is true for the LTI TX4, and the Mercedes Vito models.

“Given the intensity of taxi operations in the centre of London, the increase in levels of NO2 emissions from the newer taxi fleet is a matter of concern for local air quality management in general, and NO2 limit values in particular.”

Environmental campaigner David Davis has been campaigning since 2008 for improvements to air quality in London.

He said: “I'm extremely relieved that a reliable entity like Defra has admitted that the Mayor's strategy on clear air has failed.

“I feel outraged that this has been allowed to continue because thousands of people are dying.”

Commenting on the report's findings, its author David Carslaw stressed that the benefits of old and new taxis was complex and location dependent, but he added: “In one sense the newer taxis are worse than the older ones – for NO2, even when taking account of the fact they emit half the total NOx.”

Mr Johnson is legally responsible for introducing measures to tackle London's poor air quality, which is responsible for the deaths of more than 4,000 Londoners – many in East London - each year.

The Mayor's office was unavailable for comment at the time of going to press.

source: http://www.yellowad.co.uk/news.cfm?id=1 ... ir%20stats

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 26, 2013 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Newer diesel cars emitting more NO2, study finds


A Defra-funded study of exhaust emissions in London suggests that newer types of diesel cars emit higher proportions of nitrogen dioxide than older diesel vehicles

Nitrogen dioxide makes up a greater proportion of pollutants emitted from newer types of diesel cars in comparison to older diesel technologies, a Defra report has found.

Comparing data collected in summer 2012 with information from past Defra studies of vehicle emissions, the report also found that nitrogen oxide emissions from petrol cars have fallen over the last 20 years. Furthermore, only very low proportions of emissions from petrol cars were found to consist of nitrogen dioxide.

According to the report, ‘Road sensing of NO2 exhaust emissions from road vehicles’, nitrogen dioxide from diesel cars has increased overall from a 10-15% proportion of nitrogen oxide emissions for Euro 3 standard vehicles or older to an average of almost 30% for newer Euro 4 or 5 vehicles.

Nitrogen oxide is made up of both nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide. However, nitrogen dioxide is considered to have the greater impact on human health.

Published this week (May 20), the study states that unlike petrol cars, nitrogen oxide emissions from diesel cars peaked around the year 2000 but has overall shown little change during the last 20 years.

However, the proportion of harmful nitrogen dioxide in nitrogen oxides has increased over this period, although the study also emphasises that there are differences between pollutants emitted from different diesel technology manufacturers.

The report states: ‘It is clear that some manufacturers adopt emission control approaches that result in a considerably lower nitrogen dioxide/nitrogen oxide fraction than others. These results indicate there would be scope for significant reductions in nitrogen dioxide emissions if the lower emitting technologies were more widely adopted.’

In the study, lead authors David Carslaw of King’s College London and Newcastle University’s Glyn Rhys-Tyler summarise the key findings from a series of measurements taken during the summer of 2012. These measurements were taken by directly monitoring vehicle emissions from exhaust using a remote sensing detector provided by the University of Denver.

According to the report, the direct measurement of nitrogen dioxide has not previously been possible using other remote sensing detector (RSD) equipment available in the UK.

The project, which aimed to quantify emissions of nitrogen oxides from urban road vehicles, was funded by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) with assistance from the City of London Corporation and Ealing borough council.

However, while the study focused in particular on nitrogen oxides, measurements were also taken of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, ammonia, sulphur dioxide and particulates.

Taxis and buses

The study also found that in general, London taxis manufactured before 2000 emitted twice the nitrogen oxide per unit of fuel consumed in comparison to taxis manufactured after 2000.

In order to mitigate the level of air pollution from taxis, the report concludes that ‘the Mayor’s

proposals for a new taxi capable of zero emission (at tailpipe) operation is the most effective way of delivering comprehensive reductions in all taxi emissions’.

The study also looked at Transport for London (TfL) buses fitted with selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, which have been designed to pass Euro emissions standards rather than being optimised for urban situations – such as low speed and low engine temperature.

However, the study states: ‘There is little evidence that original equipment manufacturer SCR fitted to buses, including hybrid buses, appreciably reduces total nitrogen oxides during urban driving.’

Monitoring equipment

The report states that the remote sensing detector equipment approach of directly monitoring vehicle emissions ‘has proved to be extremely valuable’.

As a result, the study recommends that this kind of direct monitoring system is deployed in the UK more frequently, as it claims that it provides more detailed vehicle technology information.

It adds: ‘Such information would serve two main purposes: the identification of the most effective emissions control technologies to reduce nitrogen dioxide, and the information needed for emission inventories to calculate robust emission estimates.’

It also recommends that the system is used to monitor the emissions reducing technology retrofitted to 900 London buses in order to ‘help confirm the emissions characteristics of these vehicles’.

The four survey sites selected for the survey were Aldersgate Street and Queen Victoria Street in the City of London and Greenford Road and Target Roundabout in Ealing.

A total of approximately 93,000 observations were made during the surveys, resulting in a usable sample of approximately 68,000 data records.

The report is available on the Defra website.

source: http://www.airqualitynews.com/2013/05/2 ... udy-finds/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 26, 2013 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
In order to mitigate the level of air pollution from taxis, the report concludes that ‘the Mayor’s proposals for a new taxi capable of zero emission (at tailpipe) operation is the most effective way of delivering comprehensive reductions in all taxi emissions’.

That's going to cost. :-k

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 858 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group