Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 7:03 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Row over CCTV in Sheffield taxis


Taxi drivers in Sheffield will use government guidelines in their fight against compulsory CCTV cameras in cabs.

A Home Office document will be used to throw weight behind opposition to Sheffield Council’s controversial decision to introduce a mandatory requirement for cameras.

The licencing committee voted in favour in February, saying it would help to reduce abuse and violent attacks.

But Sheffield Taxi Trade Association says central government stipulates CCTV should only be attached to the conditions of a licence where there is cause for concern.

Drivers are preparing to present the document to the council ahead of a review into the decision next month.

Hafeas Rehman, chairman of Sheffield Taxi Trade Association, said: “This shows what the Government are thinking – that unless there is real evidence to support the need then it should not be enforced.

“Cameras cost up to £1,500 and, of course, money is an issue but it is secondary.

“We have done a lot of work with organisations to make better drivers and better citizens.”

Last year, the council refused or revoked licences of 23 hackney carriage drivers. Of those, 19 appealed at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court and 17 won their case.

Mr Rehman said: “The council are very cautious but they are right to be.

“We are saying that if we meet their strict criteria then the council should trust us. It damages public trust in the taxi business too.”

A Home Office spokesman said ‘a blanket requirement’ for cameras ‘ must be kept under regular review’.

He added: “Use of a surveillance camera system must always be for a specified purpose which is in pursuit of a legitimate aim and necessary to meet an identified pressing need.”

source: http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/local/row ... -1-6168475

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
Idiots.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Nidge2 wrote:
Idiots.



I agree and despair

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
captain cab wrote:
Nidge2 wrote:
Idiots.



I agree and despair



They'll be the first ones to moan when they get rolled or assaulted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
So CCTV won't prevent you from getting attacked or rolled then? Like hi-vis makes road workers bounce of lorries that pass too close?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:35 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57364
Location: 1066 Country
roythebus wrote:
So CCTV won't prevent you from getting attacked or rolled then?

It acts as a massive deterrent and a fantastic evidence provider.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:38 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57364
Location: 1066 Country
I wonder if this is the same Sheffield that produced these stats during a pilot in 2006. :-k

The pilot was run in December 2006, which included the Christmas period. Data collected showed that fitting a camera led to a massive reduction in incidents of abuse etc. towards taxi drivers; from a problem with 1 in 7 fares on average, to a problem with less than 1 in 100 fares – the most significant fall being in connection with incidents involving violence and threats. These results were subjected to statistical testing and found to be ‘significant’.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 5:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
roythebus wrote:
So CCTV won't prevent you from getting attacked or rolled then? Like hi-vis makes road workers bounce of lorries that pass too close?



I have CCTV and it works.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sussex and 708 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group