Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 08, 2026 4:02 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57375
Location: 1066 Country
Wheelchair-friendly taxis to have license fees slashed in Stroud district

IN a bid to encourage taxi drivers to provide wheelchair-accessible vehicles, Stroud District Council is halving the cost of taxi licence application fees for those providing vehicles which can accommodate passengers in wheelchairs. Currently, new applications for taxis licences cost £150 and annual renewals £120.

But now 50 per cent of this licence fee will be waived for those who can provide wheelchair accessible taxis and private hire vehicles, licensed between June 1 and May 30 2015.

Vehicles to be licensed to carry wheelchairs must meet Stroud District Council’s criteria to ensure passenger safety and there are currently only two taxi companies and three private hire vehicles licensed in the Stroud district which are wheelchair accessible.

In addition to taxis, VCA Stroud (Voluntary and Community Action) operates a ring and ride transport service and have vehicles that can accommodate wheelchairs.

Principal licensing officer for Stroud District Council, Rachel Andrew, said it was a small sum that would be saved but it is a step in the right direction. “There are currently only a few accessible taxis available in the district which allow passengers to sit in their wheelchairs in the vehicle,” she said.

“We’d like to see more and hopefully this 12-month trial will encourage taxi drivers to make the move. “With an increasingly elderly population it is more important than ever that we are able to provide services to meet their needs.”

Service manager at Lifeways, Nick Hodder is supportive of the move, as he said that there had been a case when someone could not attend a family function due to her vehicle breaking down. “Unable to find a local wheelchair accessible taxi available, she had to approach companies from outside the district, who quoted fares of £80 to come out and make the three mile round trip,” he said.

Jan Marriott and Zara Humphrey are chairwomen of the Gloucestershire Learning Disability Partnership Board and said the move was great news that their feedback was being listened to. “This could potentially lead to more disabled access taxis making it easier for people with disabilities to get out and about easily within their local community, helping them to live more independent lives.”

The trial was approved by the council’s licensing committee and begins in June.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
=D>

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Given the choice of £35k and approx £70 licence fees and £18k and £150 licence fee I'd still opt for the £18k vehicle. Now if the council wished to subsidise me for putting on a vehicle almost twice the cost of another which will earn me just the same I may consider having a WAV :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:
Given the choice of £35k and approx £70 licence fees and £18k and £150 licence fee I'd still opt for the £18k vehicle. Now if the council wished to subsidise me for putting on a vehicle almost twice the cost of another which will earn me just the same I may consider having a WAV :wink:


tighter*e

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:
Given the choice of £35k and approx £70 licence fees and £18k and £150 licence fee I'd still opt for the £18k vehicle. Now if the council wished to subsidise me for putting on a vehicle almost twice the cost of another which will earn me just the same I may consider having a WAV :wink:


tighter*e


Oh right, I can just see you wanting to spend £35k on a vehicle just to save yourself £70 :roll:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:
Given the choice of £35k and approx £70 licence fees and £18k and £150 licence fee I'd still opt for the £18k vehicle. Now if the council wished to subsidise me for putting on a vehicle almost twice the cost of another which will earn me just the same I may consider having a WAV :wink:


tighter*e


Oh right, I can just see you wanting to spend £35k on a vehicle just to save yourself £70 :roll:





its all about community ffs, what part of being a service provider (and proper taxi driver) don't you understand?

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 11:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
It is not just the purchase price of a new cab, though that is a sizable lump of the equation.

If my Manor went mixed fleet I would want a subsidy to keep my WAV on as a Taxi, circa £6k should cover it, per annum that is.

This would be for vehicle price (minus price of a Saloon) divided by number of years I could keep the vehicle, higher Insurance premiums, lower MPG, more expensive servicing, higher road tax, more expensive and shorter life tyres..... The list goes on, but I think you get the idea.

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 1:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Captain Cab wrote:
its all about community ffs, what part of being a service provider (and proper taxi driver) don't you understand?


Oh well if that's the case I'm glad I'm not a 'proper taxi driver' cos you're clearly mad if you do the job just for the community :roll:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 7:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
With the Community Transport Group providing the VAV service at a fraction of the cost of taxis/ph, why on earth would any licenced firm or driver want to spend k£10,000s' to try to compete with their subsidised activities?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 588 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group