Sussex wrote:
GBC wrote:
We've got a few million to spend on showing how inept Tfl are, how we spend our money is up to us.
Meanwhile out in county mounty land you continue to be inundated with instant licenses, extortionate radio circuit fees and a 3 hour wait on the ranks.
I'll stick to our clever c@nts.
You are welcome to do what you like with your money, I couldn't care less.
But your brainless leadership have delayed matters possibly by several years. Does that make you feel better?
And not only brainless your mob are also gutless.
Rather than allow TfL go to the high court to see if Uber's business model is legal, your mob wants to criminalise a few licensed driver trying to earn a living.
Does that make you feel brave?
Don't worry about it, it's a London issue, nothing to do with you.
And you can lay of the crocodile tears over the uber drivers, they're being backed and represented by an American billionaire and the best money can buy. Besides, how can you criminalise them if they've done nothing wrong? They haven't done anything wrong have they?
If you think TFLs inept lawyers will make any progress you're sadly mistaken, their case won't be looking for any fault from the outset, so we'll take action ourselves. The high court action will continue, albeit delayed. Nov was hardly next week anyway.
That's the beauty of having a taxi representative group with 10000 members, lawyers and the will to do something, whilst around the country they spent their time forelock tugging and pay lip service to the local licensing officers.