Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 4:26 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Decision time for borough’s taxi drivers


A row has broken out over a policy that would transform taxis in South Ribble.

Members of South Ribble Council’s licensing committee must decide tonight whether to uphold a 2005 decision, requiring all the borough’s taxis to be wheelchair accessible by next April.

Although firms were given 10 years to prepare, many are now pressing for a change of rules, claiming there isn’t enough demand to justify modifying every vehicle.

Independent driver John Gregory of Leyland said: “We don’t want to isolate disabled people, but we don’t want to isolate all of the borough either. The luxury of travelling in a saloon car will be taken away. For some of the elderly, it isn’t always practical for them to use a ramp so a smaller car is much easier.”

Cab owners will have to fund the cars themselves - a bill that could reach £30,000 - and their petition has gained hundreds of signatures from the public.

Mr Gregory added wheelchair users usually pre-book, and fares might have to go up to cover upgrade costs.

Pam Milner, whose son Jack is confined to a wheelchair because of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, believes SRBC is not going far enough over wheelchair accessible vehicles (WAVs).

Mrs Milner, a BAE worker from Longton, said: “It seems that most private WAV’s in South Ribble are used for contract work during the day to ferry disabled people to and from schools and colleges, therefore the drivers tend to work daytime hours and not at night time.”

Jack recently had to pay £40 for a return journey to attend a function less than a mile and a half away from his home, after no South Ribble firms were available and a taxi had to come from Preston.

Mrs Milner, who says the changes “shouldn’t have come as a shock” to taxi operators, has also challenged firm’s argument that most wheelchair bound residents have their own adapted vehicles, and urged SRBC to follow Preston Council’s lead by insisting all black cabs carry ramps.

She added: “Perhaps rather than listening to the taxi drivers, SRBC should survey the disabled residents.”

source: http://www.lep.co.uk/news/decision-time ... -1-6907196

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
Wouldn't it have made sense to fight this for the last ten years, rather than wait until time was nearly up?

Just a thought.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
Wouldn't it have made sense to fight this for the last ten years, rather than wait until time was nearly up?

Just a thought.


ffs - how dare you bring some common sense here!

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Decade-long taxi ruling is thrown out after petition



Taxi drivers in South Ribble have succeeded in overturning a rule requiring all their vehicles to be wheelchair friendly by April.

In 2005, the council passed a motion giving firms 10 years to get all their vehicles ready, but with the deadline looming, drivers mounted a petition, arguing there wasn’t enough demand, and it would cost too much.

On Tuesday night, members of South Ribble Council’s licensing committee decided in the driver’s favour, saying only new vehicles must be wheelchair accessible.

Taxi driver John Gregory hailed the decision “a victory for sensibility”.

He said: “We’re all very pleased with the outcome, we feel the council has listened to our concerns, and I don’t think that there could have been a fairer decision.”

A statement from the council said: “The Committee decision not only benefits wheelchair users but also addresses the requirements of ambulant disabled and elderly users.”

It adds: “The committee have also decided to review this decision in a period of five years, and wish for all the findings to be presented before the General Licensing Committee.

“This will allow the authority to keep a watching brief not only on the number of vehicles which are wheel chair accessible but also if there is a balance of vehicles for all taxi users.”

Sally Wallace from Lostock Hall, who is paralysed from the chest down, said: “I’m pleased that there’s some change, at least eventually we will end up with all vehicles wheelchair accessible.

“It was unrealistic financially for all vehicles to be changed by April, but the taxi firms left it too late.

“It wouldn’t have been unrealistic if they had started planning 10 years ago.”

source: http://www.lep.co.uk/news/local/decade- ... -1-6909849

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
So no one will be buying any new cars in the next five years then?

#-o

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Sussex wrote:
So no one will be buying any new cars in the next five years then?

#-o


Do they have an age limit ??.
It will still force all saloon owners to go WAV, meaning the council got there way by the back door and the ambient disabled will then be without.
Why not just wait for the law commission to settle things before jumping in at the deep end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
skippy41 wrote:
Why not just wait for the law commission to settle things before jumping in at the deep end


because its been resolved around the way those who didn't bother :shock:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 795 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group