grandad wrote:
Cabby John 1 wrote:
grandad wrote:
Last Wednesday I decided that I had to resign as a Councillor. The main reason being that our association had again found errors in the time recording that our council carried out which was thought to have an impact on our fees. I had a quiet word with a senior member of the Council to make him aware of this and i was asked to use my influence on the taxi drivers association to get them to let it go because it was "only a few quid." Now rightly or wrongly I decided that the truth was more important than "a few Quid." so on a matter of principal I could not support this and resigned.
I cannot understand you resigning, the truth was there to slap him with until you got your way. My take on (principle) is about taking on the unpopular, even if it makes me unpopular.
As a Councillor with a financial interest in a taxi business I was not allowed to discuss taxi issues at the Council. It would be a criminal offence. I was not prepared to keep quiet so I had no alternative but to resign.
I am thinking that as much as this is a taxi issue it is also a mistake to resign as he a (senior member) seems to think that it can be swept away.......how many other issues have been buried this way. I note the word "again", inferering to me that they have history i.e malfeance in office.
My thoughts are that you being a Councillor on this issue would not come under conflict of interest, as the ruling could be construed as being used to suppress wrong doings/the truth.......that cannot be right/correct. We are also talking about dishonesty from the said councillor if it means depriving drivers/companies of money that belong to them - especially having pointed out the problem to him.
In many respects this as such is not a taxi issue, it is an administration error, thus allowing you input/discussion. By the council hiding it, it has to put it loosely, illegal connotations.