Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 4:29 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Child protection campaigners hit out at councils for high number of taxi and private hire licences



Child protection campaigners have slammed Slough Borough Council (SBC) and the Royal Borough for issuing an ‘unusually large’ 2,500 taxi and private hire licences.

The Express can reveal Slough Borough Council, with a population of 122,000, has 901 licensed drivers.

The Royal Borough, with a population of 147,000, has issued a whopping 1,600 licences to drivers.

Together, the two boroughs have a total of 2,501 licences for a population of 269,000.

By comparison, the six councils in Lancashire (Blackburn with Darwen, Burnley, Hyndburn, Ribble Valley, Chorley and Pendle) have issued just 2,309 licences for a population of more than 700,000.

The Royal Borough has revoked two licences due to inappropriate behaviour with children in the past year. SBC has also revoked two licences due to links to adult sexual offences.

None of the drivers with revoked licences have yet received a criminal conviction; two are currently under police investigation.

Now campaigners have criticised the councils for the number of licences issued.

They worry that a lack of safeguarding training is putting young people, particularly children in care who are often transported in taxis, at risk.

Founder of women’s charity Jeena International, Rani Bilkhu, said taxis had been linked to child sexual exploitation (CSE) and there was something ‘seriously wrong’ with both councils.

“More needs to be done and we need to see not only tighter rules on who can get a licence and more training, we need to see convictions being made,” she said.

“People have no confidence in the council or the police force because if they complain nothing happens. A licence may be revoked occasionally but these people rarely end up in court.”

Richard Stokes, former leader of Slough Borough Council and child protection campaigner, said: “It is difficult to envisage over 900 vehicles operating for hire in Slough, which prompts the question – where are they all and what are they doing?”

SBC was supposed to roll out a mandatory safeguarding training programme for all of its licensed drivers in January but this has still not been introduced. The council says the programme is now likely to begin in April.

The Royal Borough is ‘working on’ a training programme for drivers, but has set no firm start date.

A Royal Borough spokesman said in a statement it was committed to protecting children and young people from the risk of CSE.

It added: “The council does not have the right to restrict the number of taxi and private hire drivers in the area. However, we ensure all of our applicants are ‘fit and proper’ as required by legislation.”

SBC said: “The council works very closely with the taxi and private hire operators and their drivers to raise awareness about how to protect young people from CSE and encourage the reporting of suspicious behaviour.”

It added it has already issued stickers to taxi drivers to display in their vehicles highlighting what to do if someone suspects an incident of CSE.

source: http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News/Ar ... 022016.htm

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Now campaigners have criticised the councils for the number of licences issued.

So would those campaigners want the council to break the law and not issue new driver's licenses for the sole reason that there are plenty already?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Are they suggesting that the councils are not performing proper checks on these drivers and that these drivers are a danger to children :?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:
Are they suggesting that the councils are not performing proper checks on these drivers and that these drivers are a danger to children :?



yes - they're suggesting exactly that - and they're correct.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:
Are they suggesting that the councils are not performing proper checks on these drivers and that these drivers are a danger to children :?



yes - they're suggesting exactly that - and they're correct.


So why don't they just say so, produce the evidence and be done with it instead of dancing around the issue. This is exactly what helped perpetrators in the first place

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Richard Stokes, former leader of Slough Borough Council and child protection campaigner


Oh now this chap is quite controversial


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news ... re-1628653

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... imate.html

http://www.maidenhead-advertiser.co.uk/ ... -21413.htm

http://moderntribalist.blogspot.co.uk/2 ... -left.html

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 749 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group