Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 12:12 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Derby councillors face questions over taxi controversies tomorrow



A Derby councillor will be asked to explain himself after allegations he used council note paper to send a letter backing two taxi drivers accused of drugs offences.

Gulfraz Nawaz is to appear before Derby City Council's standards committee tomorrow to answer the accusation. A council report said two taxi drivers licenced by the city appeared in court charged with supplying cannabis and were convicted.

The report said it was "understood", Mr Nawaz sent a reference for them "on council letterhead". It says that the issue would be the "use of the council letterhead without prior approval", which would have made his comments appear officially-sanctioned by the council.

The report says: "The monitoring officer [Janie Berry] has suspended all references being sent out using council letterheads without prior approval." Mr Nawaz said he would not speak about the issue before tomorrow's decision but that he would do so afterwards.

Another taxi driver-related complaint will be dealt with by the same committee.

It involves an allegation from a cabbie about councillor Jangir khan, who represents Normanton. The driver said Mr Khan was on a committee that stripped him of his taxi licence, when he should not have been so as he was a family friend, and should have declared an interest.

The cabbie argued the infringement meant the decision to take away his licence should be overturned, although magistrates disagreed.

The report says Mr Khan had said he was not a close family friend and that he undertook careful checks to ensure he didn't have a conflict of interest when it came to making taxi decisions.

Both issues have come to light in the wake of a damning auditors' report that found a number of problems with the way the council was being run. It discovered that, as recently as last year, drivers with criminal records were being allowed licences despite not being "fit and proper" people to hold them.

Eight councillors have been referred to the standards committee by council leader Ranjit Banwait in relation to alleged breaches of the council's code of conduct referred to in the report. Four of them were also referred by Conservative opposition councillor Chris Poulter.

Councillor's Ranjit Banwait and Chris Poulter have also referred fellow members to the standards committee

Though tomorrow's standards committee meeting will be held in public, it is still not yet known whether the other referrals by Mr Banwait and Mr Poulter will be.


Mrs Berry said: "An investigation is underway and it's premature to comment at this stage."

Read more at http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/derby-c ... OVlRAju.99

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
I reckon some cllrs are gonnA get some PORRIDGE =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
The report said it was "understood", Mr Nawaz sent a reference for them "on council letterhead". It says that the issue would be the "use of the council letterhead without prior approval", which would have made his comments appear officially-sanctioned by the council.

Utter rubbish.

If a councillor writes to a member of the public, on headed note paper, over a pothole, does that letter indicate that the councillor's views are the same as the council's?

And I think judges and juries are bright enough to work out that the councillor's views are not necessarily the same as the council.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
trotskys twin wrote:
I reckon some cllrs are gonnA get some PORRIDGE =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>


And some Leroy.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Still took him four months to leave.

Shame on him. [-X

http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/lo ... ave-783798

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
The report said it was "understood", Mr Nawaz sent a reference for them "on council letterhead". It says that the issue would be the "use of the council letterhead without prior approval", which would have made his comments appear officially-sanctioned by the council.

Utter rubbish.

If a councillor writes to a member of the public, on headed note paper, over a pothole, does that letter indicate that the councillor's views are the same as the council's?

And I think judges and juries are bright enough to work out that the councillor's views are not necessarily the same as the council.


Think this needs a bit more clarity.Council headed paper normally means a Councils view,Council headed paper with the Councillors name printed in the heading is from the Councillor perhaps answering a query,
Never known a Councillor to give a reference for a known criminal on Council headed paper.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
heathcote wrote:
Never known a Councillor to give a reference for a known criminal on Council headed paper.

I can't think of a legitimate reason why I would use Council paper to give a reference for anyone. I would have thought that if someone needed a reference from the Council it would be signed by an officer and not a Councillor.
I have never been asked to give a reference as a Councillor. I have been asked several times for a reference from our Company.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 800 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group