Taxi Driver Online :: View topic - courier wins 'gig' economy employment rights case

What is new is the way the likes of Uber and City Sprint are trying to bypasss their responsibilities and legal requirements.

It's as clear as night follows day that Uber have no chance of repaying their investors if they have the same outgoings and responsibilities as normal organisations.

The same as UBER and CITY SPRINT and they are c******* themselves over it as they know they have been found wanting also.

heathcote wrote:

The same as UBER and CITY SPRINT and they are c******* themselves over it as they know they have been found wanting also.

YES THE ENTIRE PH AND COURIER INDUSTRY WILL GET SHAGGED BY THIS AND PERSONALLY I AM DELIGHTED =D>

Sussex wrote:

I agree they are trying to bypass these things but lets be honest here what responsibilities do regular operators have towards drivers?

Author:	trotskys twin [ Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: courier wins 'gig' economy employment rights case
AS USUAL YOU PHILISTINES KEEP AVOIDING THE "WORKER" DEFINITION WHICH IS OF COURSE WHAT UBER AND CITY SPRINT ARE UP AGAINST IN THESE CASES FFS

Author:	toots [ Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:50 am ]
Post subject:	Re: courier wins 'gig' economy employment rights case
Sussex wrote: What is new is the way the likes of Uber and City Sprint are trying to bypasss their responsibilities and legal requirements. It's as clear as night follows day that Uber have no chance of repaying their investors if they have the same outgoings and responsibilities as normal organisations. I agree they are trying to bypass these things but lets be honest here what responsibilities do regular operators have towards drivers?

Author:	heathcote [ Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:55 am ]
Post subject:	Re: courier wins 'gig' economy employment rights case
The same as UBER and CITY SPRINT and they are c******* themselves over it as they know they have been found wanting also.

Author:	trotskys twin [ Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: courier wins 'gig' economy employment rights case
heathcote wrote: The same as UBER and CITY SPRINT and they are c******* themselves over it as they know they have been found wanting also. YES THE ENTIRE PH AND COURIER INDUSTRY WILL GET SHAGGED BY THIS AND PERSONALLY I AM DELIGHTED

Author:	edders23 [ Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: courier wins 'gig' economy employment rights case
trotskys twin wrote: heathcote wrote: The same as UBER and CITY SPRINT and they are c******* themselves over it as they know they have been found wanting also. YES THE ENTIRE PH AND COURIER INDUSTRY WILL GET SHAGGED BY THIS AND PERSONALLY I AM DELIGHTED wait and see this is just the early skirmishes I think this will be a loooooong campaign before either "side" can claim victory

Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

courier wins 'gig' economy employment rights case http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=30506	Page 2 of 2

Author:	Sussex [ Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:41 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: courier wins 'gig' economy employment rights case
toots wrote: Sussex wrote: What is new is the way the likes of Uber and City Sprint are trying to bypasss their responsibilities and legal requirements. It's as clear as night follows day that Uber have no chance of repaying their investors if they have the same outgoings and responsibilities as normal organisations. I agree they are trying to bypass these things but lets be honest here what responsibilities do regular operators have towards drivers? Well it appears the Tribunal is saying they have significant responsibilities, and should Uber lose their appeals (which I believe they will lose) then it will be down to everyone to ensure operator's do do what the law says they should. If not then councils should review their 'fit and proper' status.

Page 2 of 2	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/