Aren't all the arguments about plating PHV's just nonsense, a distracting side issue to the real one.
Why do we need two licensing systems. It just adds to confusion. The old days where private hire licences were intended to be for chauffeur driven hires, ie limousines, wedding and funerals etc. have long since gone. For the main part, aren't they just operating in the same way as taxis do, except they don't pick up from the street (At least they're not supposed to)?
And, aren't the traditional taxi services also mainly operating like private hire, contributing to the problems of customers having difficulty hailing from the street at peak times, infuriated by seeing empty taxis passing them by hurrying to fulfill a private hire?
This is crazy.
Wouldn't the OFT have served us better, and our customers, by resolving this dilemma?
Why not a single tier public carriage service coupled with flexibility of vehicle types to cover all licensed hire requirements?
Easy for the regulating licensing authorities, easier for those who work within the industry and much easier for the public to understand, possibly even encouraging greater use of our service, which we all want.
And, also much safer for everyone involved.
The current system suffers from the classic british disease of being designed by a committee.
Isn't it time for common sense to prevail?????
Jimbo