Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 8:47 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
Transport chiefs tell Uber drivers they must apply for new criminal record checks

Transport chiefs have told Uber drivers they must apply for new criminal record checks. Regulators have rejected the taxi giants current vetting process and are writing to 13,000 minicab drivers telling them their background checks are no longer valid. Up to a tenth of the company's workforce now has 28 days to make new applications for vetting or risk being struck off. Some of the drivers work for other companies but Uber is responsible for the largest majority of people.

A spokesman for Uber said: 'Every private hire driver in London has been through the same Enhanced DBS background check that black cab drivers go through. 'These background checks are all carried out by the government's Disclosure and Barring Service. 'Uber does not process the background checks, does not require potential drivers to use a specific provider, and does not have a say in who gets licensed. 'It is ultimately up to the regulator (TfL in London) to review the application and DBS check and decide who is granted a licence.'

Last month police accused the firm of failing to report crimes on passengers with figures showing sex attack claims involving Uber drivers are up 50 per cent in a year in the capital. The Sunday Times reported officers were concerned the US company was 'allowing situations to develop that clearly affect the safety and security of the public'.

Last week it was revealed the man arrested and charged with a terror related incident at Buckingham Palace worked for Uber. Mohiussunnath Chowdhury allegedly attacked three police officers with a samurai sword while shouting 'Allahu akbar'. And in December 2015 a former Uber driver, Muhiddin Mire, tried to behead a stranger in a London Tube station, yelling: 'This is for my Syrian brothers.'

All would-be minicab drivers in London must be checked against information held by the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS), a government agency, for criminal records, unsuitability to work with children or police warnings. TfL accepted these certificates until this year. However, it said this weekend that 'following a recent review of policy' it would no longer accept them from Onfido or any other 'third-party provider' but only its own contractor. TfL declined to describe its concerns about Onfido and other providers.

The company which runs using an app allows customers to book a taxi anywhere – meaning councils are powerless to regulate the company. Currently local taxi businesses are licensed by local authorities but the new technology firm operates across borders. Police figures show sex attack claims involving Uber drivers are up 50 per cent in a year in the capital.

Between February 2015 and February 2016, there were 32 claims made against the firm's drivers in London. But in the past 12 months to February 2017, that figure shot up to 48 alleged attacks.

The Local Government Association (LGA), the body representing councils in England and Wales, said laws dating back to 1847 needed updating to protect passengers and create a level field. The LGA has urged the Government to support legislation to modernise the licensing system. It wants national minimum licensing standards for drivers of taxis and private hire vehicles, a national database of all licensed taxi and private hire vehicles drivers, and cross border hiring.

Councils cannot take enforcement action against the rising numbers of taxi drivers licensed by other authorities operating in their area, the LGA claimed.

Uber has been accused of failing passengers by not reporting sex attacks to the police in a letter from Scotland Yard. It argued while local mini cab companies and black cabs have to adhere to the rules, Uber and other firms from outside licensing areas escape scrutiny despite operating on the same roads. There are also concerns drivers who have been refused or had a licence revoked by one authority were able to be licensed by another authority.

Earlier this month, the Daily Mail reported that according to police, Uber had not been reporting sex attacks by its drivers. The firm was accused of putting passenger safety at risk by failing to inform officers of 'serious crimes' in a formal letter from Scotland Yard. The alleged offences included at least six sex attacks and an assault. In one case, the firm was alerted to a sexual assault on a woman by a driver but took no action after he denied it. The driver was only blocked from working after he committed a more serious attack on a second woman.

During the Rotherham child sex grooming scandal, a 'common thread' emerged that taxi drivers would pick the children up for sex from care homes and schools. The Mail also revealed earlier this year how David Cameron and George Osborne allegedly told aides to lobby Boris Johnson against curbs on Uber. When Mr Johnson was mayor of London in September 2015 he threatened to curtail the activities of the smartphone app.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19213
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
why were 3rd party checks ever allowed in the first place ?

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
why were 3rd party checks ever allowed in the first place ?

A question I would be very happy to read the answer.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2469
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
why were 3rd party checks ever allowed in the first place ?

A question I would be very happy to read the answer.



Does all Councils not use a 3rd party check but the certificate goes directly to the applicant.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 19652
heathcote wrote:
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
why were 3rd party checks ever allowed in the first place ?

A question I would be very happy to read the answer.



Does all Councils not use a 3rd party check but the certificate goes directly to the applicant.

Ours still send the forms by snail mail to the DBS place and when we get the certificate we take it down for them to look at.

_________________
Grandad,
To support my charity text MAYORWALK to 70085 to donate £5


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
heathcote wrote:
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
why were 3rd party checks ever allowed in the first place ?

A question I would be very happy to read the answer.



Does all Councils not use a 3rd party check but the certificate goes directly to the applicant.

No.

Most are checked by the first party i.e. the licensing authority.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 11:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2469
heathcote wrote:
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
why were 3rd party checks ever allowed in the first place ?

A question I would be very happy to read the answer.



Does all Councils not use a 3rd party check but the certificate goes directly to the applicant.

No.

Most are checked by the first party i.e. the licensing authority.[/quote]


Is the first party not the applicant?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
I suppose it could be if you are the driver, but not if you are the council.

The issue at hand is why someone who isn't the council, who isn't the applicant, who isn't the DBS people, are getting involved in the process.

Added the indirect, some will say direct, control of the process by Uber does leave rather a nasty stain on matters, IMO.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 133 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group