Taxi Driver Online

No quick win for Uber in London over license loss

Disappointment for Uber today if it was hoping an apology and a personal visit from its new CEO would quickly reboot relations with the local transport regulator in London, which last month stripped the company of its license to operate.

The market is Uber’s most important in Europe, where it claims to have some 3.5 million users and around 40,000 drivers.

Today London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, said Transport for London (TfL) will defend its decision not to renew Uber’s license — with Uber’s appeal process likely to last months (although it can continue to operate in London during this process).

Khan confirmed that TfL would be sticking to its guns during his regular Mayor’s Question Time session. “The courts now will consider the appeal from Uber and of course TfL will defend the decision they made,” he said (via Reuters).

Late last month TfL announced it would not be renewing Uber’s license on account of its approach and conduct demonstrating “a lack of corporate responsibility in relation to a number of issues which have potential public safety and security implications”.

The four issues TfL flagged as feeding its decision were: Uber’s approach to reporting serious criminal offenses (the company has since said it’s working with London’s Met Police on a new system for reporting crimes); its approach to how driver medical certificates are obtained; its approach to carrying out background checks to ensure drivers do not have a criminal record; and how it has explained its use of internal software (codenamed Greyball) in London — software apparently designed to block regulatory bodies from gaining full access to the app and prevent officials from undertaking regulatory or law enforcement duties.

On Greyball Uber has previously stated it has not used the software in London for the purposes TfL cites — raising the obvious question of what it was using Greyball for. (We’ve asked and will update this story with any response.)

Yesterday Bloomberg reported that Uber is facing at least five criminal probes from the U.S. Justice Department — two more than previously reported. The additional DoJ probes are whether it violated price-transparency laws; and its role in the alleged theft of trade secrets outlining Alphabet’s autonomous-driving technology. (Uber has already been taken to court by Alphabet’s Waymo division over the alleged trade secrets theft. Waymo is seeking some $1.8BN in damages).

Safe to say, troubles from Uber’s legacy operations and its preference for cutting regulatory corners continue to pile up. A change of tone and a new-look CEO aren’t going to clear away all the muck overnight.

Indeed, the company was called out during a UK parliamentary committee session earlier this week, taking evidence on gig economy working practices, for the “aggressive nature” of its initial response to TfL’s decision. At the same session it also faced questions about its handling of reports of sexual assaults by drivers on its platform and on risks to road users from Uber drivers overworking.

_________________
IDFIMH

hmmmm..... well we know what will happen now the law always favours he who spends the most money

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !

Not sure about that.

_________________
IDFIMH

They are DEAD MEAT i reckon but of course corrupt Tory scum wearing wigs might be bribed to decide otherwise and then of course the GMB and Unite will push it to the next court ad infinitum

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE

It will be interesting to see how strong a case TfL puts before the courts through their barristers, after all it makes no odds to them financially who wins; in fact if TfL lose, they then have the excuse for everybody who is putting pressure on them that they did all they could and it was now out of their hands, as the law had made the decision and they must abide by it. Remember the people in TfL do not have to foot the bill if they lose, so the outcome of this court case is far from certain, and has nothing to do with Labour or Conservative, simply the people involved.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

Talking out yer ARRIS as usual TFL is totally controlled by the Mayor in this case Sadiq Khan and the Mayor is the Chair of TFL its a political organisation ffs

All decisions taken by TFL are politically influenced by the Mayor and the GLA ie they control it and of course the Mayor and Labour GLA members are all members of Unions who have the power to de select each and every one of them prior to any election ......................you thick scouse GIT

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE

Deluded.......If I might remind you the unions are responsible for the mess the trade is in now...
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=17181
PS are you still barred from entering the building...

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

I think TfL will have a very good case, and I very much doubt TfL would have come to the view that Uber are not fit and proper without a lot of legal meetings.

_________________
IDFIMH

thick scouse git i have never been barred from entering that building when we have had a Labour Mayor and who the fekk would want to meet Tory SCUM you ass licker

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE