Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 1:21 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
Killers, rapists and paedophiles apply to become Merseyside taxi drivers

Killers, paedophiles and rapists have applied to become taxi drivers in Merseyside. The horrifying criminal pasts of people who wanted a taxi licence were revealed through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request submitted to the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) by the Liverpool ECHO.

The shocking crimes people had been convicted of before applying to drive a cab include four counts of rape, 10 of manslaughter and more than 90 convictions for indecent assault - including 18 on girls under the age of 14 - since 2012. There was also someone who had applied with a conviction of sexually assaulting a girl under 13 and data showed 16 convictions outlined on applications for making indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of a child.

The DBS statistics showed that over the last five years more than 9,000 applications were submitted by people with previous convictions. Following this startling discovery every council in Merseyside was sent an FOI to ask how many criminals had applied to be taxi drivers in their borough. The ruling authorities were also asked if any applicants were successful in gaining a taxi licence despite their convictions and what the nature of the convictions for successful applicants were.

West Lancashire and Halton were also included due to the transient nature of the job and every council, apart from Knowsley, replied to the requests with varying degrees of information. Most council responses were very limited, however Sefton Council revealed hundreds of drivers were issued a taxi licence despite criminal convictions between 2014 and 2017.

Previous convictions that were not a bar to driving a cab in the borough include sexual offences, possessing weapons, racially aggravated harassment, drug dealing and drug producing, drink driving and theft. Some of those offences were committed by taxi drivers already working with a Sefton Council badge and the borough’s ruling authority still chose to continue the criminal’s licence.

In Halton the council responded to the FOI to say they could only give “very limited information” because of the laws and how they held the data. They revealed that one applicant who had an assault and threatening behaviour conviction and another who had committed theft were granted a licence. The ECHO understands that both private hire and Hackney carriage drivers across the county had concerns over who was applying for licences.

Drivers voiced their unease over people applying for licences after Knowsley Council scrapped the knowledge test. Those who spoke out over the problem wished did not want to be identified, but said that the fact drivers had no knowledge of their local area was not the only worrying facto. They suggested that knowing you didn’t have to pass the test encouraged anyone to apply.

Among other applications subjected to DBS checks by councils were eight counts of causing death by dangerous, reckless or careless driving. There was also someone who applied who had a conviction for voyeurism or recording a person doing a private act. Thousands of people with convictions for drink driving and driving while disqualified had applied, alongside hundreds convicted of dangerous driving. The figures do not show if applicants with these convictions were given licences.

At minimum, every driver is subject to a DBS check and councils have discretion over whether to disregard previous offences. Final decisions on whether to grant people licences are made by the licensing committee.

A spokesman for the DBS said: “The protection of children and vulnerable groups is of paramount importance and DBS checks are an important tool for informing employment decisions.”

Council responses to FOIs

Liverpool
“All drivers undergo an enhanced check through the DBS.

“Records of convictions are not retained by the city council.

“As such we do not hold information relevant to your request.

“Information as regards individual licence holders is considered to be personal data and as such is exempt from disclosure.”

Wirral
“Once a licensing decision has been made regarding an applicant any records of convictions are not kept.

“The Licensing Authority therefore does not hold this information.

“It is a matter of public record when an applicant is referred to the Licensing Panel for a decision to grant or refuse a licence and www.wirral.gov.uk holds details of meetings and committees.

“Although unable to provide details of individual cases I can advise that some applicants who have convictions have been granted licences in accordance with Wirral Council’s Policy and Guidelines relating to the Relevance of Convictions.”

Sefton
The response from Sefton Council was very thorough and answered the questions asked in the FOI as outlined in the piece above.

Knowsley
Did not respond.

St Helens
“This data is not held in a format that we are able to extract.

“A manual search of existing records would need to be carried out which would take longer than the 18hrs allowed for this purpose.

West Lancashire
“In order to provide you with the information on the scale that you have requested would require to individually examine each record for all issued private hire and hackney carriage driver licences.

“We estimate that it will take us in excess of 18 hours to determine appropriate material and locate, retrieve and extract the information in reference to your request. Therefore, your request will not be processed further.”

Halton
“Only information on proposed drivers who fell outside the Councils Relevance of Convictions Policy guidance and who attended before the Councils Regulatory Committee and the applications were determined is available.

“As Regulatory Committee items dealing with such matters are deemed exempt items and therefore not for publication by virtue of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 very limited information can be provided.”

That information is provided in the piece.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20860
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Isn't this about the 4th or 5th time in the last 10 years this rag has run this non story

just because they apply doesn't mean they get accepted ](*,)

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20860
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
oh look the east hull rag has a similar story :roll:

http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/number-hull-taxi-drivers-arrested-965687

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
Isn't this about the 4th or 5th time in the last 10 years this rag has run this non story

just because they apply doesn't mean they get accepted ](*,)

Agreed, but the article does say some got licensed, and continued to remain licensed.

But I go back to one of the comments I made in those previous years and that's councils shouldn't be keeping records of our DBS checks.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:36 pm
Posts: 1477
That will be the reason the half dozen or so uber drivers working Chester are Knowsley plated then!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
Isn't this about the 4th or 5th time in the last 10 years this rag has run this non story

just because they apply doesn't mean they get accepted ](*,)

Agreed, but the article does say some got licensed, and continued to remain licensed.

But I go back to one of the comments I made in those previous years and that's councils shouldn't be keeping records of our DBS checks.



Councils should keep the TAXI(hackney carriage) registers in the format that the Act states,which the PUBLIC can view on demand and will see what offences if any have been committed by drivers and operators.
Using data protection as an umbrella to hide under is not acceptable as the LAW is clear as to what has to be provided.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
My repeated point is that once councils have made a decision to re-license they have no reason to keep a copy of our DBS report.

Therefore they should have no data to pass onto journalists looking for a lazy anti cab story.

And I also take the view that having a public register of owners and drivers is a breach of the DPA.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Sussex wrote:
My repeated point is that once councils have made a decision to re-license they have no reason to keep a copy of our DBS report.

Therefore they should have no data to pass onto journalists looking for a lazy anti cab story.

And I also take the view that having a public register of owners and drivers is a breach of the DPA.



It would seem not if you read the advice given.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 665 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group