Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 1:46 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Trade unionists march through Oxford in support of sacked 001 taxi driver

PROTESTERS marched through Oxford this afternoon in support of a taxi driver who claims he was sacked simply because he was a trade union organiser.

About 100 GMB members marched through the city in support of Mohammed Fadlalla, a married father of three, who was told his services were ‘no longer needed’ by 001 Taxis in January.

The march started outside 001 Taxis’ office in St Aldate's and continued through wind and rain, to the company’s other base in Osney Mead, west Oxford.

Orange, white and black flares were lit and GMB flags were waved before the protest wound through Oxford – slowing buses in Queen Street because of protesters inadvertently walking into their paths.

Mr Fadlalla first worked for 001 Taxis in 1998, and joined the GMB a year ago, after what he claimed were disputes with management.

His main duties were driving children with special needs to and from school.

Within a couple of months he was a GMB organiser, though he said trying to recruit members to the union did not win him favours with the company, which employs about 300 drivers.

He was sacked on January 5 and has been feeding his family by borrowing money from other taxi drivers since. The 49-year-old, from Marston, led the march with his wife, Nawal, and children, Mazia, 13, Ahmed, 11, and Leena, eight.

Mr Fadllala said of the turnout: “I feel overwhelmed. Everyone’s here to support me. It’s just representative of the GMB.”

The Oxford Brookes graduate worked for 001 for about 10 years. He then completed a degree in sound technology and digital music between 2007 and 2011 before resuming his work for the company.

Mick Rix, GMB national officer, said: “We’re stood outside a horrible company. Quite a number of taxi operators across the country employ the same tactics.

“There’s an old saying in the trade union movement: ‘an injury to one is an injury to all’, and we aren’t going anywhere.”

A tribunal into Mr Fadlalla's dismissal is due to begin in Reading on February 28.

001 Taxis was contacted by the Oxford Mail but declined to comment.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I wonder if Trotsky attended :roll: no doubt his support was via a keyboard but you have to wonder if some of these big companies are afraid of what might result if members become unionised

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 9:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
What I can't understand here is why the chap has not worked since jan 5th. Are there no other bases that he could have joined?Has he been blacklisted by all the other bases because of his union activities?
If his services have been dispensed with because of his union services I think the company could be In trouble.
I am not a big fan of unions but if one trade would benefit from drivers being in a union then it is our trade. There are so many bad bosses out there that it is a disgrace.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Can they sack a self employed driver??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
skippy41 wrote:
Can they sack a self employed driver??

No!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:
Can they sack a self employed driver??

We go back to the recent 'workers' status court cases.

If it can be shown that the driver can be classed in one of the worker groups, then yes he can be sacked, and he can then claim.

My view is the PH firm are in trouble.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
skippy41 wrote:
Can they sack a self employed driver??

Where does it say he was self employed?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
Can they sack a self employed driver??

We go back to the recent 'workers' status court cases.

If it can be shown that the driver can be classed in one of the worker groups, then yes he can be sacked, and he can then claim.

My view is the PH firm are in trouble.

His tribunal case is due to start at the end of the month.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 706 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group