Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:13 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 53921
Location: 1066 Country
Addison Lee tells London mayor Sadiq Khan congestion charge for private hire vehicles but not black cabs is "anti-competitive"

The boss of Addison Lee has written to Sadiq Khan in a call to maintain the congestion charge exemption for private hire vehicles, saying removing it will damage drivers and competition.

Transport for London (TfL) has been mulling ditching private hire vehicles' exemption from the congestion charge, and last week set out new ideas for ways to improve regulation for the industry including forcing firms to share their data.

Addison Lee said hitting private hire vehicles with the congestion charge would represent a cost to the industry of as much as £250 per driver per month. The company was also critical of a situation where the exemption is removed for private hire vehicles but not black cabs, saying that would be "anti-competitive".

Andy Boland, the firm's chief executive, said: Private hire vehicles play a vital role in helping to move millions of people safely around the capital each day - they are particularly important to certain groups such as vulnerable adults, as TfL noted in its policy statement on private hire only this month – and I can therefore see no possible reason why private hire vehicles should be treated any differently from taxis with respect to the congestion charge.

Boland said levying the charge on private hire vehicles was "a blunt instrument" that would knock investment, distort competition and hurt drivers "to the detriment of passengers and the travelling public".

The firm said levying the charge on private hire vehicles works against TfL's own policy goals and will do nothing for the environment. “Given the competitive nature of the market, fares would be unlikely to rise to reflect any imposition of the congestion charge. There would therefore be no change in demand, and no improvement to the environment,” Boland said.

To improve London’s air quality, it would be far more effective to focus on the laudable ultra-low emission zone and on installing more charging points for electric vehicles. It said those which have subsidised fares will most likely absorb the costs to hoover up greater market share and keep fares "artificially low", and to stay competitive in such a scenario, the likes of Addison Lee will have to pass the cost onto drivers. That will then hit their drivers' earnings.

A mayoral spokesperson said: The mayor and TfL are keeping user charging schemes, including the congestion charge under review to ensure they are as effective as they can be. As part of this TfL are currently undertaking further analysis on the impact of removing the exemption from the congestion charge for private hire vehicles.

London Assembly Liberal Democrat member Caroline Pidgeon said: “The growth in private hire vehicles has contributed to the growth in congestion in many parts of London and a range of policies are needed to address that. “One area where immediate action must be taken is much firmer action against private hire vehicles which misuse their congestion charge exemption.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19110
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
and of course all those Maybachs Ferraris range rovers etc registered as PH with TFL are not adding to bus lane congestion :roll:

and I'm sure TFL could do with the money especially as they have now had to sell and lease back all those crossrail trains before the lines fully open to fund some of their overspend on "improvements" elsewhere on the overground/underground and wombling free

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 53921
Location: 1066 Country
Interesting reply to the AL letter from the fellas fighting AL over workers rights, c/o Taxi Point.

https://www.taxi-point.co.uk/single-pos ... n-charging

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 10:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13815
Addison Lee wrote:
It said those which have subsidised fares will most likely absorb the costs to hoover up greater market share and keep fares "artificially low"...


Naming no names, obviously... :lol:

James Farrar, UPHD wrote:
Instead, you must secure the powers to cap and reduce the number of private hire vehicles in London which in turn might stabilise our incomes and end the terrible exploitation of drivers now prevalent across the industry.


Capping is one thing, but how could number be reduced? :-k


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 53921
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
Capping is one thing, but how could number be reduced? :-k

Think the English test will have quite an effect.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 105 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group