Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 5:24 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Taxi drivers in stand-off with parking enforcer at Chichester station

A three-year row over taxi parking at Chichester Railway Station has now ‘boiled over’, angry drivers say. The situation has reached a stand-off, with most of the licensed hackney carriage drivers now refusing to pay the £395 annual fee to use the ranks on the forecourts.

Indigo Park, which manages the car park and forecourt on behalf of Govia Thameslink Railway, has issued one of the drivers with hundreds of pounds of penalty notices and isn’t allowing others without a permit onto the rank. Fined driver Alan Venables, however, is refusing to pay. “I want them to take me to court,” said a defiant Alan, who has been a self-employed taxi driver operating from the station for the last ten years.

Another driver, Christian Burada, who has been working there since October, 2014, said: “The rank permit increases by £40 each year but there is no reason for this when business is going down in the town. “I am happy to pay if everyone else is made to but it will probably be over £400 next year. It’s hard to justify.”

Police are understood to have been called a number of times, and now British Transport Police is understood to be seeking a meeting between the drivers and Indigo. Indigo said there was ‘no problem’ but it was aware that ‘drivers regularly use the rank without a relevant permit’. A spokesman said: “Permits are available for registered taxi drivers at Chichester station. “Vehicles that use the taxi bays without a relevant permit will be issued with a penalty notice.”

Alan said the problems, which had ‘come to a head’ in recent weeks, began around three years ago, because there was no co-ordinated method of enforcing the permits, meaning some were allowed to use the rank without it. Alan said: “All we wanted was a level playing field where everyone had to pay the same.” Only around five of the hackney drivers are believed to currently have the permit.

Alan says he contacted Chichester District Council, trading standards and Indigo but the issue was not resolved and had ‘festered’ ever since, now resulting in the stand-off between drivers and Indigo. Now Alan and some of the drivers are questioning if the charge, believed to be related to a by-law, is even legal.

A Chichester District Council spokesman said: “As a licensing authority, our responsibility is to ensure that hackney carriages are safe for the public to use. “This includes ensuring that drivers are displaying the right signs, drivers are fit and proper to operate and ensuring drivers are updated regarding changes in regulations and safety information. “Obtaining a rank permit does not fall under our control and is down to each individual hackney carriage driver. “The ranks outside Chichester railway station are situated on land owned by Govia Thameslink Railway, and it employs a company called Indigo to operate all the taxi ranks outside its stations.

“Because it is not our land and does not fall under our legal control, each driver has to apply to Indigo for a permit which allows them to wait on the rank. “As part of our information sharing, we inform new drivers of Indigo’s requirement, and we also remind existing drivers as part of their annual taxi licence renewal letter that they must obtain a permit from Indigo. It is then up to each driver to obtain the permit. “We have been informed by British Transport Police that they are planning to set up a multi-agency meeting regarding the issues that drivers have raised regarding these permits.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
The land is not owned by Govia, it is owned by Network rail and managed by Govia.

Railway Bye-Laws need to be consulted on the legality of rank charges, but wasn't there a case in Bristol not so long ago where the courts found in favour of the railway company?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
if it is private land there has to be provision in a bylaw for fines to be issued at that site and a separate bylaw is required for every single site i believe; so it may well be a different situation to that at temple meads

that said I'm sure they would have checked the legality of issuing the fines before they started.

The problem is that train companies are finding it increasingly hard to make money with the huge pay settlements that seem to be the normal for railways in this country so they are looking for other sources of income and taxi permits are an easy target

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18531
Reading between the lines, suspect small number of regulars have been buying a permit, opportunists have been picking up at times and getting away with it. So the regulars have gotten fed up paying for a permit, and are now ranking without it, but they're getting ticketed, while the opportunists aren't.

Easy target syndrome.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 662 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group