Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 10:59 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 3:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18531
Taxi driver banned from working in Lichfield after court upholds council’s decision not to renew his licence

https://lichfieldlive.co.uk/2018/09/01/ ... s-licence/

A taxi driver has been told he cannot operate in Lichfield after a court upheld a decision not to renew his licence.

Lichfield District Council won the case against Mohammed Chowdhury at Stoke Crown Court after the local authority had opted not to renew his taxi driver’s licence following complaints about him and carrying out a series of mystery shopper tests.

The council said the Birmingham-based driver had overcharged, failed to give receipts and been abusive to a passenger.

Chowdhury had appealed a previous court ruling, but an appeal at Stoke Crown Court found in the council’s favour.

Cllr Ashley Yeates, Cabinet member for regulatory services, housing and wellbeing, said: “It’s so important that we have the authority to monitor any taxi drivers that operate within the district, to make sure they are offering a good service and are safe.

“This is why we’re really pleased with the Crown Court’s ruling to uphold our decision to reject Mr Chowdhury’s licence renewal application.

“We do not want any taxi drivers with poor customer service to work locally.”

The court ordered Chowdhury to pay the council’s costs of £6,000 which, when added to the £5,000 costs from the original Magistrates’ Court case, makes a total of £11,000 in costs.


For completeness, this was the article about the earlier appeal to the magistrates' court:

Taxi driver ABUSIVE to lone female at night and OVERCHARGED passengers

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32490

A taxi driver who abused a lone female passenger and was also caught overcharging by mystery shoppers has lost his licence. Lichfield District Council officers rejected Mohammed Chowdhury’s taxi licence renewal following a number of complaints.

Chowdhury, aged 48, from Starbank Road, Birmingham, appealed the decision but first the council’s Licensing Committee and now Newcastle under Lyme Magistrates’ Court upheld the officers’ decision. Newcastle under Lyme Magistrates’ Court has found in favour of Lichfield District Council after a taxi driver appealed the council’s decision not to renew his taxi driver’s licence. The court has now ordered Chowdhury to pay Lichfield District Council’s costs of £5,000.

The case revealed that, despite receiving a warning about professional conduct, complaints continued and Lichfield District Council carried out mystery shopper tests on Chowdhury. The test purchasers were overcharged, not given receipts and, on one occasion, the meter was not even on.

In a further case, Chowdhury was abusive to a woman making a journey on her own at night. The driver first appealed to Lichfield District Council’s Licensing Committee after council officers rejected his application to renew his taxi licence. On October 18, Newcastle under Lyme Magistrates’ Court upheld the council's decision.

Councillor Doug Pullen, cabinet member for regulatory, housing and wellbeing, said: “The taxi drivers we licence must meet the professional standards we expect of them. "We take any complaints into conduct very seriously, and regularly carry out mystery shopper tests to make sure taxis that operate across the district are delivering the service we expect.

"We are pleased with the court’s ruling to uphold our decision not to renew Mr Chowdhury’s licence, as we do not want taxi drivers who do not have their customers’ best interests at heart to operate locally.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 3:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18531
Quote:
The court ordered Chowdhury to pay the council’s costs of £6,000 which, when added to the £5,000 costs from the original Magistrates’ Court case, makes a total of £11,000 in costs.


:shock: Why are the costs in both appeals so high here? 8-[


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
StuartW wrote:
:shock: Why are the costs in both appeals so high here? 8-[

Probably because they have been awarded in full, usually there is a massive discount on costs applied for but if the the Bench at Magistrates or the the Judge at Crown don't see a discount as warranted, then you pay it all.

It isn't the Public Prosecutor it's the LA that are Defending the Appellants action so it is almost like a Civil Matter.

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
:shock: Why are the costs in both appeals so high here? 8-[

Because the council would have employed external counsel on both occasions.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 561 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group