Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 11:07 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
Watford Uber driver fined after he falsely claimed benefits

A fraudster Uber driver failed to reveal he was a taxi driver when he claimed benefits.

Murat Coker, from The Turnstones, in Watford, has been ordered to pay £619 for falsely claiming benefits.

He didn’t tell Watford Borough Council that he had a Transport for London taxi licence and had been an Uber driver since 2015.

Fraud investigators from the council made checks through the National Fraud Initiative after they discovered Coker had not been honest in his application.

On May 11 last year, Coker was interviewed under caution where he admitted to falsely claiming £2,355 in benefits. He pleaded guilty to one charge under the Fraud Act 2006 at St Albans Magistrates Court.

He received a financial penalty of £335, as well as costs of £284 for prosecution and victim surcharge. Arrangements are being made to pay the benefits back.

Peter Taylor, Elected Mayor of Watford, said: “Our consistent success in prosecuting benefit fraud sends a clear message that it will not be tolerated. It is a great example of how we ensure money is not taken illegally out of the public purse.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
One down.

Best part of a 100,000 to go.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18540
Isn't one of Uber's claims that because they don't deal in cash all the drivers will be accountable for their tax to HMRC?

Obviously forgot about the benefit fraud angle :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 12:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Sussex wrote:
One down.

Best part of a 100,000 to go.



It does not state in article that TFL have revoked his license so the assumption he has been shot down may not be correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 1:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
It does not state in article that TFL have revoked his license so the assumption he has been shot down may not be correct.

My point wasn’t in relation to stopping his and other’s TfL license, more stopping those claiming social money when working.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Sussex wrote:
Quote:
It does not state in article that TFL have revoked his license so the assumption he has been shot down may not be correct.

My point wasn’t in relation to stopping his and other’s TfL license, more stopping those claiming social money when working.



there are entire companies built around benefits it is sadly a major part of the trade

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 747 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group