Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:19 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 10:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 4071
Uber's hopes go into reverse in new TfL battle for London licence

https://news.sky.com/story/ubers-hopes- ... e-11776430

Uber's hopes of securing a new five-year licence from TfL are likely to be dashed next month, Sky News learns.

Uber Technologies is facing an uphill struggle to secure a long-term licence from London's transport regulator little more than a year after it was forced to go to court to overturn an outright ban.

Sky News has learnt that Uber, the world's best-known ride-hailing service, is privately expecting its application for a permit from Transport for Licence (TfL) to result in the awarding of another short-term licence.

Industry sources said this weekend that‎ New York-listed Uber had little chance of being granted the full five-year term when a probationary period expires towards the end of next month.

Instead, the company, which has a market value of $68.5bn (£56.3bn), is understood to be resigned to getting a further temporary extension of under two years.

Such a decision would be a blow to Uber, which is used by millions of Londoners and roughly 40,000 drivers in the capital.

London is among the technology company's most lucrative markets in the world, and its most profitable outside the US.

One source said that a further 15-month or 18-month licence would underline the extent of the task facing Uber and its chief executive, Dara Khosrowshahi, as it seeks to persuade international regulators that it is a responsible corporate citizen.

"There is next to no chance that Uber will get a five-year licence in September," said a person close to the company.

Insiders said there remained tensions between Uber and TfL over the app's commitment to some of the 14 conditions set out by Westminster‎ chief magistrate Emma Arbuthnot when she awarded the temporary licence in June 2018.

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan had endorsed TfL's refusal to award a licence the previous autumn on the grounds that Uber was "not a fit and proper" operator in the London private-hire market.

In her judgement, Ms Arbuthnot said that the appointment of a trio of prominent businesspeople - including the media veteran Roger Parry - to its UK board represented an important step towards transforming its corporate governance.

However, she highlighted Uber's refusal to accept blame for shortcomings in conducting criminal record checks on drivers and delays to informing regulators about data breaches as reasons for continuing concerns about its oversight.

Among the conditions set down in the ruling was that Uber: must demonstrate greater transparency in relation to regulatory probes; must not use software to evade investigations; and improve its criminal reporting and complaints-handling processes.

An Uber spokeswoman declined to comment on whether it had failed to meet, or breached, any of the 14 conditions.

Sources said that Uber's application to renew its London licence had been submitted in the last month.

A decision from TfL is due to be made ahead of the expiry of the current term on 25 September.

One source close to the company claimed this week that a further 15-month licence "would not be a disaster" and pointed out that TfL had issued several permits of that duration this year, including to Ola and Viavan, although they acknowledged that these were first-time licensees in the capital.‎

The chances of Uber not being granted a licence at all next month were put as "highly unlikely" by the source.

A TfL spokesman declined to comment.

The former Ofcom chief executive, Ed Richards, who jointly runs consultancy Flint Global, is said to be continuing to advise Uber on regulatory affairs.

The legal battle over its London licence is not the only courtroom fight it has been involved in in Britain.

Earlier this year, it survived a High Court challenge brought by a group of black cab drivers who alleged that Ms Arbuthnot's ruling had been "tainted by actual or apparent bias" because of financial connections between her husband and Uber.

Last month, Uber drivers lost a legal battle to avoid paying congestion charges in London.

Uber's attempt to prolong its presence in London comes as it considers a takeover bid for Addison Lee‎, one of the capital's biggest minicab operators.

Sky News revealed last week that both Uber and Ola had met Addison Lee executives recently to discuss a potential offer.

Sources close to Uber have said the chances of buying the company from Carlyle, its private equity backer, are remote.

Run by Andy Boland, its chief executive, Addison Lee has a fleet of about 5,000 cars in London and holds a roughly 10% share of the market, behind traditional black cabs and Uber.

The New York-listed company's preliminary interest in Addison Lee is surprising because of the disparities in their business models.

Uber's drivers are effectively self-employed and use their own vehicles, while Addison Lee either owns or leases its cars to drivers.

In an effort to improve its reputation, Uber has launched an environmentally focused campaign called its Clean Air Plan, which levies a 15p-per-ride fee on every trip booked through its app in London.

The company has said it expects the move to raise more than £200m "to support drivers transitioning to electric vehicles over the next few years".

Uber's New York Stock Exchange-listed shares closed on Friday at $40.40, more than 10% below the $45 at which they were priced in May's flotation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 12:55 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 43515
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
An Uber spokeswoman declined to comment on whether it had failed to meet, or breached, any of the 14 conditions.

It would beggar belief if Uber had failed to meet any of those conditions.

Let's hope they have.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 1:27 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 43515
Location: 1066 Country
This might have something to do with the above.

Article from Taxipoint website.

https://www.taxi-point.co.uk/single-pos ... o-question

Uber fined £29,600 calling London probationary licence into question

Westminster Magistrates Court has fined Uber for contravening the terms of its licence by allowing drivers to pick up passengers in London without the required hire and reward insurance. The Licensed Taxi Drivers’ Association and Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Taxis are now calling for the Mayor of London to end Uber’s operation in London once and for all.

On Wednesday 31 July, Uber was fined £29,600 by Westminster Magistrates Court for allowing its drivers to pick up Londoners in vehicles without proper insurance and for failing to keep adequate records. The ride-hailing firm was fined £14,000 for each count of allowing its drivers to accept bookings in vehicles without the required hire and reward insurance, and £800 for each count of failing to keep adequate records.

Transport for London (TfL) mandates that minicabs must be covered by hire or reward insurance at the point of licensing and when in use as a private hire vehicle (PHV). This means that hire or reward insurance must be in place at all times when the PHV is in use, and that if a PHV belonging to a private hire operator is found undertaking bookings without appropriate insurance, then TfL may take regulatory action against the operator.

The conviction follows a ruling by Westminster Magistrates Court last year, which overturned TfL’s decision to refuse Uber a licence on grounds that it was not a “fit and proper” operator. Uber is currently operating under a probationary licence in London, which is due to expire this September.

The Licensed Taxi Drivers’ Association and Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Taxis, Wes Streeting MP, say it’s time action is taken to bring an end to the unscrupulous practices of Uber in London and to better protect passengers.

Commenting on the news, Steve McNamara, General Secretary of the Licensed Taxi Drivers’ Association said: “The Mayor of London rightly refused to renew Uber’s five-year licence on the grounds of blatant disregard for Londoner’s safety.

“Uber told the courts last year that it had cleaned up its act and deserved a second chance, but has since put the public at serious risk by allowing its drivers to pick up unsuspecting Londoners in uninsured vehicles. The firm is not “fit and proper” by any definition. “The LTDA has written to the Mayor of London to demand that Uber’s probationary licence be revoked with immediate effect.”

Commenting on the news, Wes Streeting MP, Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Taxis and Labour MP for Ilford North, said: “This is just the latest example of Uber flouting the rules of the road that everyone else is expected to abide by. “Once again Uber’s status as a “fit and proper operator” is called into serious question. The Mayor and TfL must act.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 1:38 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 43515
Location: 1066 Country
Interested to find out how TfL knew about the uninsured hirings, and how many 1000s they miss.

But in the list of utterly stupid things a firm could do in 2019, this from Uber must be near the top.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group