Sussex wrote:
You could have said Teenagers arrested.

Certainly could, but wanted to convey the fact that at 14 the youngest was, er, quite young.
Of course, could have just included the 14-year-old, but then it would have looked like only one involved and/or the rest of the title would have been grammatically incorrect
Anyway, will amend to say 'teenagers', but on the plus side I can now include the word 'robbers', and 'arrested' instead of 'arrests'.
Of course, strictly speaking it should read 'alleged' robbers, but not enough space, even if 'teens' used instead of 'teenagers'
Decisions, decisions.
Of course, intention is to get as much useful/interesting/relevant information in the thread title as possible, so usually a case of compromise.
And no doubt all a bit pointless anyway in the grand scheme of things, but gives me something to think about on the rank
Think I'm just a frustrated sub-editor, really (the person who dreams up the headlines in newspapers), and a stickler for accuracy.
I mean, that Clydebank article earlier talks about 'driving offences' in the headline. But in the main they're not driving offences at all - they're crimes of dishonesty, although they may involve driving.
And no need to point out the possible inaccuracy of the t-word, which of course is Heathcote's domain.