Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 6:53 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18513
Desperate :doubt:


Banbury taxi driver fined for lying about criminal record

https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/17985 ... al-record/

A CONVICT with a history of assaulting a schoolchild has been fined for lying in his application for a taxi licence.

On Monday, Abdul Ghafoor of Grimsbury Square, Banbury pleaded guilty of making a false statement under The Local Government Act 1976.

Having failed to disclose his criminal record when applying for a taxi licence, he was ordered to pay £1,240, including a £400 fine and £800 of costs.

In 2014, Ghafoor had had his taxi licence revoked for assaulting a school child in his taxi.

He reapplied in 2016 and his application was denied because of a history which included two counts of dangerous driving and the assault by beating.

In April 2019 he submitted a fresh licence application and stated that he had no prior convictions, but an investigation swiftly led to suspicions that he was making a false statement.

Cherwell District Councillor Andrew McHugh, executive member with responsibility for licensing, said: “Passenger safety is our paramount concern when it comes to the licensing of taxi drivers. We work to make sure anyone and everyone who holds a taxi driver is a fit and proper person.

“Our officers have thorough knowledge of what occurs on their patch. Anyone who thinks they can get away with withholding a criminal past from them will find they have another thing coming – as this conviction proves."

Council policy requires that anyone wanting to drive a private hire vehicle or Hackney carriage in the district completes mandatory safeguarding training, a fit and proper person check and a Disclosure and Barring Service check.

The council refuses any application from people convicted of the most serious offences and requires proof of ten years of good behaviour for those with spent convictions for minor offences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20850
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Interesting a council prosecuting an applicant for a badge . I didn't think it would bother after all they can just refuse the application on the grounds of the false decleration

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57342
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
Interesting a council prosecuting an applicant for a badge . I didn't think it would bother after all they can just refuse the application on the grounds of the false decleration

Sometimes it's good to make an example of someone.

Especially as this looks like a slam dunk.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20850
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
Interesting a council prosecuting an applicant for a badge . I didn't think it would bother after all they can just refuse the application on the grounds of the false decleration

Sometimes it's good to make an example of someone.

Especially as this looks like a slam dunk.



but what would it have cost them to do it ?

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18513
edders23 wrote:
Interesting a council prosecuting an applicant for a badge . I didn't think it would bother after all they can just refuse the application on the grounds of the false decleration


Maybe because it wasn't simply a straightforward false declaration on an application?

He was badged before, lost it after assaulting a child and other stuff, then he applied again and was rejected, then applied again and didn't declare his previous.

Might have been different for a newbie with one application.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2019 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57342
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
but what would it have cost them to do it ?

The staff are already getting paid, and the legal fees should be recouped from the driver.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 667 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group