Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 2:33 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18520
Very similar article to one a few months ago which claimed that Worthing drivers are going here (Adur) to licence because of restrictive conditions (including tints) but now it's claimed Adur driver are going elsewhere to get licensed because of restrictive conditions (including tints) :-s

As Sussex alluded last time, these arguments about cross-border stuff are possibly just a red herring, and it's just more about gripes surrounding vehicle spec etc.

The cross-border stuff might well be happening anyway :?

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34853&p=393942


Taxi drivers accuse Adur District Council of ‘playing Russian roulette’ with public safety

https://www.worthingherald.co.uk/news/p ... -1-9193826

Image
Councillor Robin Monk, (second from left) and taxi drivers from left, Steve Manville, Sean Ridley and Salah Abdallah (Image: Derek Martin Photography/Worthing Herald)

Adur District Council has been accused of ‘playing Russian roulette with public safety’ through prohibitive taxi licensing regulations.

Inconsistent and strict guidelines are forcing taxi drivers to modify their vehicles in unsafe ways, according to the chairman of Adur Taxis and Private Hire Trade, Sean Ridley.

Drivers are also going to other local authorities to get a licence, under different standards, but returning to Adur to work.

Sean said: “It’s dangerous. Adur is losing control of licensing and taxis in the area. They are playing Russian roulette with public safety in order to pursue their own whims. We will end up with a patchwork quilt of operators with licences based on different standards.”

Sean said window tint restrictions are inconsistent. Guidelines state windows must not restrict ‘all view’ inside the vehicle, with limits ‘at the discretion’ of the individual inspector. This left inspectors having differing ideas of suitability, he added.

Taxi drivers pick cars based on economy and reliability, Sean said. As most offer window tints as standard, drivers must choose a less cost-effective car or modify them at their own cost.

As manufacturers do not offer non-tinted windows, drivers turn to less safe, unregulated alternative window suppliers.

Lancing councillor Robin Monk has resigned from the licensing committee in protest.

He said a lack of communication from the council meant his constituents’ concerns could not be raised and made ‘a farce of being a councillor’.

Mr Monk called for regulations, including whether taxis must have CCTV, to be more consistent and fair.

A council spokesman said regulations had public safety in mind and the most recent guidelines had been agreed after consultation with Sussex Police.

“Taxis are public service vehicles and, as the licensing authority, it is our duty to ensure a high standard of public safety for those using them,” said the spokesman.

“As part of that we regularly review the Adur Taxi Handbook, which acts as a guide for those involved in the trade.

“The most recent handbook, adopted at a public meeting in March after widespread consultation, includes a restriction on vehicles having heavy tinted windows. This was after representation from Sussex Police and others, who were concerned a restricted view of the interior could compromise the protection of vulnerable passengers.

“To minimise the financial impact on vehicle owners, councillors agreed to introduce the conditions on a rolling replacement basis, which means only new and replacement vehicles are required to comply. If new windows need to be fitted, it is the vehicle owner’s responsibility to ensure their vehicle complies with the law.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
This was after representation from Sussex Police and others, who were concerned a restricted view of the interior could compromise the protection of vulnerable passengers.

And what evidence have they for that view?

Have they had issues in the next door area of B&H? Have they f***.

Have they had issues in any other Sussex council? Have they f***.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 266 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group