Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 6:43 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 25, 2020 9:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18534
Revocation a bit harsh for this kind of thing, in my opinion, particularly as the prosecution has cost them dearly in monetary terms.


Two Ashford taxi drivers fined for refusing to take partially sighted passenger and support dog

https://www.kentonline.co.uk/ashford/ne ... ce-222685/

Two taxi drivers have been fined for refusing to take a partially sighted passenger and their support dog.

The person first sought a ride from the Ashford International Train Station on the evening of March 21, 2019, but was refused by Kemal Yalcin, of the town's Ploughmans Way.

The dog-assisted person - whom the council has chosen not to identify - then asked Jamshed Nasir of Oakland, Ashford, who also declined to take them and left the passenger struggling to get home.

This is in spite of a legal duty on taxi drivers to take a disabled person who is accompanied by an assistance dog.

Ashford Borough Council’s licensing team decided to prosecute for the offences under the Equality Act 2010 and yesterday both defendants were found guilty at Folkestone Magistrates Court.

They had both denied the offence and therefore the matter had gone to a full trial.

District Judge Justin Barron commented upon its conclusion the taxi drivers had knowingly turned the passenger away.

He noted parliament's intention when drafting the Equality Act was to stop what had happened, to prevent disabled people being told to go to someone else down the cab rank.

The judge said to interpret the act any other way would "drive a coach and horses" through the intention of parliament when they drafted the Act.

Yalcin was fined £180, ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £30 and costs of £1,200, while Nasir was fined £270, ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £30 and costs of £1,200.

Both drivers also had their taxi licences revoked by the council at a prior hearing and neither are appealing the decision.

Chair of the council's licensing committee, Cllr Peter Feacey, said: "I hope that our action following these incidents shows how robustly we will deal with taxi drivers who fail to comply with their legal obligations and leave a potentially vulnerable person at risk."

Siobhan Meade, guide dogs engagement officer for the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association, said: "Refusing to carry someone who is blind or visually impaired simply because they work with a guide dog strikes at the very independence we exist to provide.

"I know from personal experience that each refusal feels like an assault from which the mental scars remain.

"We welcome Ashford Borough Council's actions in this matter and we will always support them with test-purchasing, advice and support."

If you think you have been discriminated against by a taxi driver in the borough of Ashford, email brief details to licensing@ashford.gov.uk or call 01233 331111 or you can visit the Civic Centre on Tannery Lane in person to report your concerns.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2020 7:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
so that's 3 this year already

I have a suggestion why don't we have a single thread for guide dog refusal stories I know it will run to hundreds of pages but it might serve as an online reminder of just how big a problem this is

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2020 6:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
The name says it all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2020 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
Revocation a bit harsh for this kind of thing, in my opinion, particularly as the prosecution has cost them dearly in monetary terms.

I think a lot of this is the deterrent factor.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 593 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group