Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 12:10 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 12:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13823
Nothing particularly new here, but quite a bit of detail about how the mystery shopper excerise was undertaken.


Taxi hire ‘mystery shopper’ scheme is extended

https://www.expressandstar.com/news/loc ... -extended/

The scheme consisted of a series of journeys made in both Hackney carriages and private hire vehicles by wheelchair users, people with mobility difficulties and blind or partially-sighted passengers with guide dogs in Wolverhampton.

Those taking part were also asked to complete a questionnaire relating to issues of safety, accessibility, the driver’s attitude, comparison to other transport facilities and anything they thought was particularly good or bad.

The council’s commercial regulation manager, Chris Howell, told members of the city’s non-statutory licensing committee that as a result of the feedback obtained, he felt the scheme could be continued and extended.

“We engaged with a number of volunteers from local disability groups, council employees and a member of West Midlands Police to carry out the mystery shopper scheme,” he said.

“A total of 19 journeys were undertaken in December last year and in February by volunteers using both Hackney carriages and private hire vehicles.

“These were people who were either wheelchair users, had difficulties with mobility due to hip replacements and osteoarthritis, or were blind or partially-sighted and accompanied by a guide dog.”

A report to the committee revealed that 13 journeys were undertaken in private hire vehicles and six in Hackney carriages.

Two journeys were taken by a volunteer in a wheelchair. Seven journeys were taken by a volunteer that was blind or partially sighted and accompanied by a guide dog. Two journeys were taken by volunteers who were blind/partially-sighted and also had difficulties with their mobility.

“During two of the journeys undertaken in Hackney carriages by wheelchair volunteers, the drivers failed to secure the wheelchair users correctly,” said Mr Howell.

“As a result both drivers attended a review hearing and a wheelchair training and assessment course. I’d like to propose that we continue the exercise and extend the remit.”

Each mystery shopper was required to hire a taxi from a rank in the city centre to a particular destination and then book a private hire for a return journey.

If physically possible, the mystery shopper was asked to travel alone. All visits and questionnaires were conducted anonymously to ensure accurate and efficient results could then be collated.

Licensing compliance officers observed the start of the hiring from a concealed location so that they could take down the vehicle registration number and the Hackney carriage or private hire licence number.

Every customer was accompanied beforehand and met afterwards to ensure their physical wellbeing and safety in locations they were not familiar with or areas that could be potentially busy.

Council staff involved were fully informed of the individuals’ physical disability and how to further assist them in making their journey more comfortable.

Overall the feedback showed that the duties contained within the Equality Act 2010 in relation to drivers was very positive, with the level of compliance being 100 per cent in six of the seven duties.

Figures showed that 87.5 per cent of the mystery shoppers rated the assistance provided by drivers as good to excellent with 12.5 per cent rating it as average.

Positive comments made in the questionnaire included “driver offered to push me” and “driver offered to stow my bag with wheelchair”, while on the negative side one customer said “driver didn’t fold up offside bench seat making it difficult to turn to face rear”.

Other figures showed 90 per cent rated the driver’s helpfulness as good to excellent; 88 per cent rated the driver’s efforts to make the vehicle accessible as good to excellent; and 84.5 per cent rated the facilities available during the journey as good to excellent.

Overall 71 per cent rated the service provided by the operator as good to excellent, although one customer stated “didn’t know where Molineux Stadium or Wulfruna Street was, couldn’t offer an estimated time of arrival, difficult to understand”.

Facilities were rated good to excellent by 79.5 per cent; the necessary steps taken by the driver by 80 per cent and the fleet’s accessibility compared to other forms of public transport by 79 per cent.

Committee members voted unanimously in favour of extending the mystery shopper exercise in the future.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 53921
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
A report to the committee revealed that 13 journeys were undertaken in private hire vehicles and six in Hackney carriages.

Quote:
Each mystery shopper was required to hire a taxi from a rank in the city centre to a particular destination and then book a private hire for a return journey.

:-k

Quote:
“During two of the journeys undertaken in Hackney carriages by wheelchair volunteers, the drivers failed to secure the wheelchair users correctly,” said Mr Howell.

“As a result both drivers attended a review hearing and a wheelchair training and assessment course. I’d like to propose that we continue the exercise and extend the remit.”

I get that the fella not doing his job got into trouble, and deservedly so, but did the good guys get a thank you and well done from licensing officials?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19115
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
No mention of WHEN these tests were carried out ? I assume before lock down but if during then should this exercise have not taken place at all ?

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 9:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13823
edders23 wrote:
No mention of WHEN these tests were carried out ? I assume before lock down but if during then should this exercise have not taken place at all ?


Quote:
“A total of 19 journeys were undertaken in December last year and in February by volunteers using both Hackney carriages and private hire vehicles."

Now that my TV licence has officially expired, if a compliance officer comes to the door I won't have to worry about watching it if it's someone like Edders, because they'll be quite, er, suggestible :-s


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19115
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
No I just skim read the articles and missed that bit :-"

By the way as to the TV license you will get months of letters before they bother actually sending an inspector out.

Just for a laugh I ignored the letters when the other house was empty before tenants moved in and waited for an inspector to turn up and see the house was Empty but got about 1 letter every 3 to 4 weeks and as far as I know they never turned up because the cycle kept repeating

After about 3 or 4 you will get one asking are you in on such and such a date. In the end I think I had 4 of those but if they had turned up they would have seen it was an empty house

You could always just phone them up when the first one arrives and declare the property unoccupied but if they do check you might be in trouble

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13823
edders23 wrote:
No I just skim read the articles and missed that bit :-"

Yes, I think the regulars had surmised that some time ago :badgrin:

Quote:
By the way as to the TV license you will get months of letters before they bother actually sending an inspector out.

Tell me about it. I think you think I'm exaggerating, but I've literally gone months without switching on my TV. In fact, in my last gaffe, a few years ago I was short of cash when my TV licence came up for renewal. Was barely watching the TV, and it was an old anologue one, so I just took it to the skip.

But the letters *never* stop coming if you have an address without a TV licence. You can sign declarations etc, saying you don't have a TV (or don't watch it), and that might stop them for a while, but they'll start again. Suspect I've literally had hundreds of letters over the years, and you start to ignore them after a while. And they get more urgent and threatening, but the enforcement officer never seems to arrive, despite the endless threats of a visit.

Quote:
Just for a laugh I ignored the letters when the other house was empty before tenants moved in and waited for an inspector to turn up and see the house was Empty but got about 1 letter every 3 to 4 weeks and as far as I know they never turned up because the cycle kept repeating

Ah, yes, Edders the property magnate as well as the taxi mogul :-o

That's what I was alluding to the other week when we were talking about sources of cash, but didn't want to say :wink:

Quote:
After about 3 or 4 you will get one asking are you in on such and such a date. In the end I think I had 4 of those but if they had turned up they would have seen it was an empty house

You could always just phone them up when the first one arrives and declare the property unoccupied but if they do check you might be in trouble

Yes, I think you can declare a property unoccupied or that you don't have a TV, and that'll stop the letters for a while. But they'll start again.

I think you think I'm joking, but my TV was literally not turned on for weeks/months on end.

Funnily enough, I've developed sudden urges to watch it now the licence has officially expired.

But it's not actually illegal to own a TV as long as you don't watch live TV.

Think in the past you needed a licence even if you had a TV that you didn't watch, but I don't think that's necessary now.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 147 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group