Have ignored quite a few of the other articles, but thought the one from the Isle of Wight might be a bit different.
Not really, but a quick read reveals the dangers of churnalism. The headline and first few paragraphs read:
Isle of Wight County Press wrote:
Even fewer taxis and private hire vehicles on the Isle of Wighthttps://www.countypress.co.uk/news/1950 ... sle-wight/The number of taxis and private hire vehicles on the Isle of Wight fell, between March 2020 and March 2021.
Department for Transport figures show 239 vehicles were licensed to operate here in March, down from 243 the previous year.The National Private Hire and Taxi Association is blaming what it says was a "sheer absence" of any financial support for the industry over the Covid lockdowns.
The figures in the highlighted paragraph demonstrate that as regards the Isle of Wight the thrust of the article is totally incorrect - the decrease in numbers is, er, statistically insignificant and tells us nothing about the market.
Maybe a better headline would have been something like: "Little change in taxi and private hire vehicle numbers despite downward national trend."
And you don't need to know the trade to realise this, as several of the comments on the website make clear:
Quote:
4 fewer taxis. Hell of a story and scoop there.
Quote:
Number of island taxis down by 1.6 percent during a pandemic where fewer people need taxis - what a catastrophe!!! Who will save us??!!
Quote:
So 4 taxi drivers giving up in a year is a news story is it? I assume there's no covid doom and gloom to post this week?