Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 8:16 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 6:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13904
Taxi driver who hit cyclist at 70mph while on phone then deleted call history jailed

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/taxi-driv ... t-25045828

Kashyap Patel, 39, has been jailed after he hit a cyclist whilst on a call causing brain injury, and then restoring his phone to factory settings.

A taxi driver who crashed into a cyclist at 70mph while on a call and then wiped his phone data has been jailed for two years and eight months.

Kashyap Patel, 39, was not arrested after the collision but has since admitted to causing serious injury by dangerous driving and perverting the course of justice.

Patel's iPhone and Motorola had already been handed over to Kent Police when he was able to restore them to factory settings remotely.

But, after recovering SIM card information and reaching out to phone companies, the police discovered that Patel used both of his phones.

Records show that he was on the phone for around 10 minutes, both leading up to the crash and during the collision.

"When asked about the data being erased he admitted he had done so," said prosecutor Peter Forbes in court.

"He said he went online, logged into the Cloud and that there was a way you could delete it.

"However some data was obtained via the SIM cards and records show both phones had been in use at different times prior to the collision."

"The deleting of the data from the phones within hours of them being seized was a calculated act intended to impede the police investigation."

The court heard Mr Isted, a project engineer in the construction industry, gives talks to children in schools about the importance of wearing a cycling helmet.

It was later admitted by Patel that he was on the phone to his wife when he hit Mr Isted, and he says he wiped his phones after panicking that his bank details will be shown to the police.

As well as his prison term, the father-of-two driver from Tunbridge Wales has been banned from driving for three years and 10 months.

This comes after Mr Isted, who was out cycling to train for a triathlon, was thrown into the air on impact from Patel's Ford Tourneo van in East Peckham, Kent, on Sunday 6 January 2019.

Mr Isted suffered serious injuries including biting through his tongue, a brain injury and a fractured spine in several places.

He had to undergo surgery to fit metal rods into his back and still requires treatment to recover.

In his victim statement, Mr Isted explains that he can no longer compete in the Ironman challenge, something he dreamed of doing for his 50th birthday.

Witnesses say that they were able to see Mr Isted from up to half a mile away as he was wearing a hi-vis jacket, trousers, cycling shoes and gloves, and riding a £4,500 bike with three rear-facing red, flashing lights.

Mr Isted has decided not to return to cycling from the accident.

"I know I'm lucky to be alive and that without my helmet and the assistance of other road users and paramedics at the scene this would not be the case," Mr Isted wrote in his statement.

The court heard the cabbie, who was not carrying passengers at the time of the incident, could have pulled into the second lane of the dual carriageway and overtake Mr Isted.

It was said in court by prosecutor Forbes that while Patel had not been speeding, he lied to the police who came to the scene that Mr Isted had cycled into his blind spot

During the sentencing, Judge Catherine Moore said: "The use by drivers of mobile phones has long been recognised to have a serious and detrimental effect on a driver's ability to concentrate on the road."

"You didn't see Mr Isted despite him being clearly visible and took no evasive action as your van closed in upon him.

"You knew the significance of the mobile phones.

"Albeit you may have been in a state of panic, you took a deliberate action to wipe the data.

"Although some information was recovered from the phone companies, the full extent of your phone use may still be unknown."

The defence attorney, Ian Dear, emphasised that Patel's driving record had been excellent prior to his 'mindless stupidity', and that deleting the phones' data was 'a severe attack of the panics'.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 6:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13904
Quote:
But, after recovering SIM card information and reaching out to phone companies, the police discovered that Patel used both of his phones.

Stop saying 'reached out'. Bad enough when it's touch-feely PR spiel from Uber, but simply shouldn't be used in a serious news report about crime ](*,)

Quote:
As well as his prison term, the father-of-two driver from Tunbridge Wales has been banned from driving for three years and 10 months.

I know it's no laughing matter, but suspect that should be Tunbridge Wells rather than Tunbridge, Wales :-|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19213
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
StuartW wrote:
Quote:
But, after recovering SIM card information and reaching out to phone companies, the police discovered that Patel used both of his phones.

Stop saying 'reached out'. Bad enough when it's touch-feely PR spiel from Uber, but simply shouldn't be used in a serious news report about crime ](*,)

Quote:
As well as his prison term, the father-of-two driver from Tunbridge Wales has been banned from driving for three years and 10 months.

I know it's no laughing matter, but suspect that should be Tunbridge Wells rather than Tunbridge, Wales :-|



since when has the daily mirror employed journos who have any sort of professionalism ?

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
Thankfully the victim wasn't killed, but clearly could have been.

A lesson to many of us in the trade that live on their phones.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9164
This Guy obviously wasn't to bright if he thought that by deleting his call record on his phone that he'd be getting rid of all evidence.....surely he must know that all calls and timings are logged on their network providers servers even if their conversations are not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19213
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
bloodnock wrote:
This Guy obviously wasn't to bright if he thought that by deleting his call record on his phone that he'd be getting rid of all evidence.....surely he must know that all calls and timings are logged on their network providers servers even if their conversations are not.



not so sure because we had one round here who killed a motorcyclist his bit on the side who was on the phone to him at the time lied to the police about it and both had deleted the record but she wasn't prosecuted at all (he went to jail for killing the motorcyclist)

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
she wasn't prosecuted at all

What would she have been prosecuted for?

Perverting the Course of Justice? How?

She was on the phone and deleted the details of that call. Her actions didn't stop the course of justice as they had his details.

Deleted your phone records is not a crime, she played no part in any crime.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2021 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13904
Sussex wrote:
She was on the phone and deleted the details of that call. Her actions didn't stop the course of justice as they had his details.

Deleted your phone records is not a crime, she played no part in any crime.

But if she lied to police and deleted her phone records in order to protect the accused then in theory at least she attempted to pervert the course of justice?

Of course, whether or not to prosecute her was a different matter, but if her intention was to mislead the police, destroy relevant evidence and generally thwart the investigation then in principle she committed a crime?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
But if she lied to police and deleted her phone records in order to protect the accused then in theory at least she attempted to pervert the course of justice?

I suspect she said 'no comment'.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13904
I just took it at face value when Edders said she 'lied' :wink: :-s


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
I just took it at face value when Edders said she 'lied' :wink: :-s

No comment. 8-[

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: heathcote and 148 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group