Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Jul 02, 2022 5:39 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 10242
Bit confusing this if you read it too closely. But I'm guessing it's maybe because he was revoked originally, then it was reinstated on appeal to the magistrates, then revocation was ordered by the High Court judge on appeal :?

So to that degree it maybe reads as a tad inconsistent.


Taxi driver in Rhondda Cynon Taf has licence revoked for accepting fares without a licence

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/loca ... f-24300233

Sui Hung Yip of Church Village has had his licence revoked after a successful council appeal

A taxi driver in Rhondda Cynon Taf has had his licence revoked for accepting fares and carrying passengers without a licence following a council appeal. Sui Hung Yip of Church Village has seen the council’s licensing department's decision to revoke his licence upheld following a successful appeal hearing.

An appeal hearing at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court judged that he was not a fit and proper person to drive a taxi, the council said in a statement. Having previously had his licence revoked by the RCT Council’s licensing department following complaints received regarding his conduct as a driver, the department received information that Yip continued to accept fares and transport passengers without a licence.

As part of an investigation by council officers, the council said Yip accepted a fare with the intention of collecting passengers within the Church Village area. Officers waited and encountered Yip arrive in a licensed vehicle to collect the fare. During a conversation with council licensing officers they said Yip admitted accepting the fare without a licence. The council said that his actions put the public at risk as he would not have been insured to drive the vehicle and accept a fare.

This decision was initially appealed by Yip at magistrates court in December 2021 where the magistrates overturned the revocation but RCT Council appealed this decision at Merthyr Tydfil Crown court on public safety grounds. Following the crown court hearing, the judge agreed with the council and ordered the revocation of the licence.

A spokesperson for RCT Council’s licensing department said: “We have a duty to ensure all taxi drivers in Rhondda Cynon Taf place paramount importance on the safety of the public. A taxi driver holds a position of trust and has a duty of care, and when they fall below the expected standards, we have no hesitation in revoking their licence. We are pleased with the outcome of this case.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 10242
Quote:
As part of an investigation by council officers, the council said Yip accepted a fare with the intention of collecting passengers within the Church Village area. Officers waited and encountered Yip arrive in a licensed vehicle to collect the fare. During a conversation with council licensing officers they said Yip admitted accepting the fare without a licence. The council said that his actions put the public at risk as he would not have been insured to drive the vehicle and accept a fare.

So he was revoked, but arrived in a *licensed* vehicle, but he admitted accepting a fare *without* a licence? :-s

Of course, perhaps it was someone else's vehicle, or only his badge was revoked and not his plate :?

But, as usual in pieces like this, the article brushes over the badge/plate distinction, so who knows?

Or it's maybe just a simple error in the article.

But presumably all that was before the magistrates reinstated his revoked licence, which was then re-revoked :-s


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 50450
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
The council said that his actions put the public at risk as he would not have been insured to drive the vehicle and accept a fare.

Very carefully worded by the council. What they really wanted to say is that the public wont be insured, but we all know that the public are always insured in the event of an accident.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 50450
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
But presumably all that was before the magistrates reinstated his revoked licence, which was then re-revoked

Or maybe the council's legal team buggered up the trial in the Mags Court.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group