Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 11:58 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2023 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Workington taxi driver stopped due to speed was over cocaine limit

A TAXI driver who was pulled over by police due to his speed was more than nine times the limit for cocaine.

Darren Weston, 36, was taking another taxi driver home just after midnight on December 20 when he was noticed by officers, Workington Magistrates’ Court heard.

Peter Kelly, prosecuting, said police who were on patrol in Workington saw the Skoda being driven by Weston and had concerns about the speed of the vehicle.

He was pulled over on Church Road in Harrington and was spoken to. A drugs wipe gave a positive indication for cocaine. The defendant was arrested and taken to the police station.

A blood sample was taken which showed he had 95mcg of cocaine per litre of blood. The limit is 10mcg.

Mr Kelly said Weston had not been in trouble for over a decade and had been co-operative with police.

The defendant, of Bowness Court, Workington, pleaded guilty to driving a motor vehicle with a proportion of a specified controlled drug above the specified limit.

John Cooper, defending, said: “Speaking to Mr Weston, he is confident someone has reported him to the police. The officer knew his name when he got out.

“It’s a guilty plea at the first opportunity. He has always been a gentleman who has stayed out of trouble.

“Things have got the better of him. He has been on a night out, offered it and taken it.

“He is a taxi driver. He was in a taxi. There’s no suggestion he was working. He will lose his job. He lives with his partner. He has four children. He is going to lose everything.

“There was someone else in the car. Another taxi driver going home. Not a paying customer.”

Weston was banned from driving for 14 months. He was fined £120 and must pay £85 costs and a £48 victim surcharge.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2023 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Quote:
A TAXI driver who was pulled over by police due to his speed was more than nine times the limit for cocaine.
[-X [-X [-X

Quote:
He is a taxi driver. He was in a taxi. There’s no suggestion he was working. He will lose his job. He lives with his partner. He has four children. He is going to lose everything.


yes it's his own fault :roll: there is no excuse or mitigation for that; in fact you wonder why his partner puts up with his drug taking as it can't be safe with kids around.

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2023 3:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
...on the other hand, there are probably worse cokeheads holding down responsible jobs and on big salaries, and doing a better job of bringing up their kids than a jakey consuming legal amounts of alcohol, say :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2023 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Drug driving is catching out 1000s and 1000s.

Basically drugs stay in your system a lot longer than booze. In some cases weeks.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2023 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Sussex wrote:
Drug driving is catching out 1000s and 1000s.

Basically drugs stay in your system a lot longer than booze. In some cases weeks.



so the moral of the story is if you insist on ruining your health and future by taking drugs don't drive a car !

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2023 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Drug driving is catching out 1000s and 1000s.

Basically drugs stay in your system a lot longer than booze. In some cases weeks.



so the moral of the story is if you insist on ruining your health and future by taking drugs don't drive a car !

Indeed.

There have been a couple of raves down here recently at some of the local beauty spots.

The police have worked out that they merely have cars waiting at all entrances and drug test all drivers leaving the morning after.

They have caught dozens and dozens.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2023 9:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Sussex wrote:
They have caught dozens and dozens.

Which demonstrates the wider moral of the story.

The Establishment shouldn't normalise drug use then express surprise when people are using drugs while driving :-o


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2023 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
Sussex wrote:
They have caught dozens and dozens.

Which demonstrates the wider moral of the story.

The Establishment shouldn't normalise drug use then express surprise when people are using drugs while driving :-o

I'm not so sure the establishment has normalised drug use, it appears that society has but not the powers that be.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2023 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Well maybe it's different in Sussex, Sussex, but up here they just let drugs rip. Here's the consequences, never mind the drug-driving and the like:

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/640/cpspr ... 021-nc.png


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2023 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Another fine example of how drugs seriously impair your judgement (not taxi related)

Image

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2023 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
Driver on Crack?

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2023 1:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Sussex wrote:
StuartW wrote:
The Establishment shouldn't normalise drug use then express surprise when people are using drugs while driving :-o

I'm not so sure the establishment has normalised drug use, it appears that society has but not the powers that be.

Peter Hitchens on drug driving etc:


The police gave up the fight against drugs years ago, and this is the result

IF you looked into most of the violence in this country, you would likely find that drugs were at the bottom of it. And the lawless maiming and killing of road users by dangerous drivers is definitely a form of criminal violence.

What a contrast it is to the carefully promoted image of marijuana as a ‘harmless high’ to see the tangled metal, flames and life-ruining carnage of a road accident - and to realise that has very probably been brought about by the use of this substance.

Drug-driving is at least comparable to the knife crime that is such a terrifying problem in London and other cities. And as Rebecca Camber reports, the amount of drug-driving has now surpassed the amount of drink-driving in this country. After almost 60 years of pretending that drugs were not really a problem, and only concerned puritan old fogeys, we find that these substances ruin and end lives. Yet even then, the enforcement of a law against this menace is inadequate, with dangerous criminals being caught and then let off because it is a bit difficult to proceed against them.

Actually there is a much wider problem with drugs. In almost all cases of highly publicised terrorist violence, here and abroad, the culprits have been found to be users of mind-altering drugs.

This does not mean that marijuana turns people into terrorists (though in some cases it surely does). It means that in the few cases where the media spotlight is turned on the culprit’s life, there is a striking link between violence and long-term drug use.

The ceaselessly updated website ‘Attacker Smoked Cannabis’ records scores of hideous violent crimes in which allegedly peaceful marijuana has been a feature.

But - in a country far too used to such crime - such events are these days only reported locally.

Yes, alcohol is also a dangerous drug and, given the impossibility of banning it after thousands of years of legality, we should try a lot harder to control it as we did until the 1980s. But the astonishing thing is that illegal drugs, which - on paper - attract heavy prison sentences should be doing so much damage, while we do so little about them. By far the best way of making our roads safer would be to do as they do in Japan and South Korea, and prosecute and punish the possession of illegal drugs. That would stop this problem at its source.

The police of this country long ago decided it was not worth their while to do much about the huge and growing use of dangerous, illegal drugs.

They achieved this by simply ignoring the laws they are paid to enforce. They then pretended that crime was falling, when in fact they had just stopped paying attention to it. The policy started with marijuana, a highly dangerous drug whose use is linked with severe mental illness, but which years of skilful PR falsely portrayed as ‘soft’. Then it moved on to the bogeyman drugs such as cocaine and heroin, and all the rest of these idiotic poisons. We pay the price of this police arrogance every day.

I am sorry if this upsets you. I too would much prefer to respect and admire the police. But here’s the proof: in February 1994, the former head of Scotland Yard’s legendary Flying Squad, John O’Connor, wrote a newspaper article in which he admitted the stark truth: ‘Cannabis has been a decriminalised drug for some time now.

‘Although still illegal, somebody found by police in possession of a small amount for their own use will probably just get away with a caution these days.’ Please note again, this was in 1994. A few years later, after yet another elite ‘report’ into the drug laws (all these reports want to soften the law) this arrangement was formalised across England and Wales.

Chief police officers, without troubling to consult Parliament, invented their own ‘Cannabis Warning’, a non-punishment, not even centrally recorded, which would be applied to most cases of marijuana possession. Not long after that, they more or less totally gave up doing anything at all, and large parts of urban Britain now reek of dope, especially in the summer months.

Are you surprised, in the light of this, that so many people drive while drugged? In 2012, in a carefully researched book, The War We Never Fought, I explained that this was a long one-way process, dating to the 1960s.

The police are not totally to blame. Politicians, civil servants, judges and magistrates have all worked together to undermine the law of the land. They do not believe drugs are really bad. But if we want them to enforce the laws then the people of this country must reject and reverse the long liberal campaign to soften the drug laws, and make our political leaders act to ensure that the drug problem is stifled at its source - the irresponsible individuals who buy and take these poisons.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2023 1:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Peter Hitchens wrote:
I am sorry if this upsets you. I too would much prefer to respect and admire the police. But here’s the proof: in February 1994, the former head of Scotland Yard’s legendary Flying Squad, John O’Connor, wrote a newspaper article in which he admitted the stark truth: ‘Cannabis has been a decriminalised drug for some time now.'

:-o

Peter Hitchens wrote:
The police are not totally to blame. Politicians, civil servants, judges and magistrates have all worked together to undermine the law of the land. They do not believe drugs are really bad.

:-o


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2023 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
As I've learned over the years trying to be "sensitive" or kind or not imposing discipline ,law etc leads to one thing and one thing only those who think they are better than everyone else or should be treated better than everyone else take full advantage

woke culture is here to stay and with it comes the violence and lawlessness because it lets the wild animals off the leash

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2023 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
The police are not totally to blame.

Not sure I concur.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 946 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group