Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 10:00 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Taxi driver fined following a successful prosecution by Telford & Wrekin Council

A taxi driver has been fined and had his license put under review, after caught picking up fares without a booking and invalid insurance, in an undercover operation by Telford and Wrekin Council.

Mr Kobina Badu was caught plying for hire in a joint operation by Telford and Wrekin Council’s licensing team and City of Wolverhampton Council in November 2022. – Plying for hire means picking up passengers that have not pre-booked with their operator, thus invalidating insurance.

Mr Badu was licensed by City of Wolverhampton Council but illegally picked up undercover officers in Telford and Wrekin.

Mr Badu of Majestic Way, Aqueduct, Telford appeared before Telford Magistrates Court and admitted the charges.

The court issued a conditional discharge for six months and Mr Badu was ordered to pay £576 and had six penalty points added to his driving licence. The taxi licence is now subject to review and may be revoked.

Councillor Richard Overton, deputy leader of Telford & Wrekin Council and cabinet member for homes and enforcement said:

“These cases show Telford & Wrekin Council is determined to keep cracking down on taxi drivers who break the law and potentially put passengers at risk.

“Plying for hire is a serious offence. It means that if a driver has picked up a fare that has not been pre-booked and they are involved in an accident, they will not have valid insurance.

“We know most licensed drivers operate legitimately but there are those who think they can make extra money by ignoring the rules.

“The council will continue to tackle plying for hire by carrying out operations. We will not hesitate to bring court proceedings which could lead to a driver paying a fine and having their licence suspended. It’s not worth the risk.”

Councillor Craig Collingswood, City of Wolverhampton Council Cabinet Member for environment and climate change, said: “Public Safety is of paramount importance to us.

“Partnership working with our licensing colleagues and other agencies shows our commitment to upholding our responsibilities; we expect drivers and vehicles licensed by us to always maintain the highest standards.

“This is irrespective of the administrative boundary within which they are operating at any particular time. City of Wolverhampton Council takes its enforcement responsibilities seriously and our officers are out across the country, every Friday and Saturday night, working to protect the public.”

The safest way to use a private hire taxi is to book directly with the operator. This means a customer will be driven by a licensed, insured driver in a licensed, insured vehicle. It also means there will be a record of their journey, the driver and the vehicle used so it can be traced if necessary.

Telford and Wrekin Council is also hosting a survey about taxi safety and currently inviting people to submit their views.

The council encourages people to report concerns about taxi drivers and vehicles which are licensed by the authority. This can be done online: Report a complaint - Taxi and Private Hire Licensing - Telford & Wrekin Council

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 1:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
In a Telford & Wrekin Council press release, Councillor Craig Collingswood, City of Wolverhampton Council Cabinet Member for environment and climate change wrote:
“Public Safety is of paramount importance to us.

“Partnership working with our licensing colleagues and other agencies shows our commitment to upholding our responsibilities; we expect drivers and vehicles licensed by us to always maintain the highest standards.

“This is irrespective of the administrative boundary within which they are operating at any particular time. City of Wolverhampton Council takes its enforcement responsibilities seriously and our officers are out across the country, every Friday and Saturday night, working to protect the public.”

In an Oldham Council press release, Councillor Craig Collingswood, City of Wolverhampton Council Cabinet Member for Environment and Climate Change wrote:
"Public Safety is of paramount importance to us.

“Partnership working with our Licensing colleagues and other agencies shows our commitment to upholding our responsibilities; we expect drivers and vehicles licensed by us to always maintain the highest standards. This is irrespective of the administrative boundary within which they are operating at any particular time.

“City of Wolverhampton Council takes its enforcement responsibilities seriously and our officers are out across the country, every Friday and Saturday night, working to protect the public.”

Spot the difference, apart from some differences in the use of capital letters and paragraphs [-(

Otherwise, precisely the same statement from the Wolves councillor, faithfully regurgitated by two totally different councils by their 'comms' people.

Bad enough the usual cliches about 'safety' being 'paramount', and 'partnership working' with 'other agencies', but this kind of takes it all that to a new level - not 'multi-agency' partnerships, but multi-council enforcement operations the length and breadth of the country.

And not just that, but Wolverhampton Council getting all holier-than-thou about safety and 'working to protect the public'?

The usual PR and bovine excrement, but this takes all that and gaslighting us to a different level [-(

And lets me rant on at an even higher level than normal :lol: :oops:

Anyway, the press release isn't even a very good explanation of the legalities involved, particularly in view of the constant use of the t-word.

And, of course, while most on here could easily assume it was a PHD involved, it's only after four uses of the t-word that the term 'private hire taxi' is used, and sort of confirms it was PH :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
Stuart W, with the quotes you made, they bound to be very similar......

In your two headers it points out both were "Councillor Craig Collingswood, City of Wolverhampton Council Cabinet Member for environment and climate change wrote". If that was the case then the adjustment to paragraphing and capitalisation is simply a print setter making subtle changes to improve the layout for whichever publication it was destined for without a change of substance.

If it's the same quote which was received by the Journalists from two different LA's it would have to end up being pretty much the same. If I was a Councillor I would much prefer to give things out written, much less chance of a damaging misquote.

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
One has to wonder how many of those 22,000 licensed as PH by this basket case of a council licensed there because they know they basically have free reign to do as they please 100s of miles away.

Two got caught, how many 1000s help themselves every day?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 3:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Chris, I think we're maybe at cross purposes. The identical quotes from the Wolverhampton councillor were contained in press releases issued by Oldham Council and Telford Council. Presumably Wolverhampton Council sent the quotes to the latter two councils so they could include them in their press releases.

My point was essentially one I've made often enough before, about the formulaic and PR-orientated nature of such statements, and here it was doubly ridiculous because the same statement from the Wolverhampton councillor was faithfully repeated in news releases by two completely separate councils. Thus it was essentially three councils' comms people echoing how ridiculous the licensing dimension is with regard the Wolverhampton council.

Not sure about the involvement of 'print setters' either - think you're showing your age, there :wink:

Somehow I suspect this kind of thing is all done electronically these days - council press releases like that will just be posted to their websites (which is where both the above came from), and if the press does use them they'll just rehash them electronically.

But you're right about the 'style' changes etc, but I'd guess the Wolverhampton people sent out the statement to their equivalents in Oldham and Telford, and the latter would have made minor changes to the paragraphs and capitalization.

Not many changes but, for example, one says:

Quote:
Partnership working with our Licensing colleagues...

While the other says:

Quote:
Partnership working with our licensing colleagues...

Can't say for certain, but I'd guess that Wolverhampton issued the statement using the capitalised 'Licensing colleagues', and one of the other councils removed the capital L, while the other left it as it was.

Which reflects the more modern trend - newspapers, websites, magazines and other news outlets tend not to capitalise stuff unless it's a proper noun (eg 'first minister Humza Yousaf' rather than 'First Minister').

And, on here, me and you are the polar opposite in that regard :-o

One oddity in that regard is this in the two press releases:

Both Oldham and Telford councils wrote:
Public Safety is of paramount importance to us...

Both the Oldham and Telford press releases have retained the capital in Safety. I mean, hello? :-s

(By the way, when using the quote function on here, the word 'wrote' in the header is automatically generated by the software. It's not always the best word, because it sort of assumes that something was written down by a particular person. In that regard, maybe 'said' or 'stated' would be a better word than 'wrote', but the software generates the word 'wrote' automatically :?)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 3:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Anyway, for what it's worth, more detail about what happened in an Express & Star article. Which is more Wolverhampton than Telford, so I'd guess this below is based on a press release by Wolverhampton Council, but can't see it on their website. Or maybe the Express & Star did have a reporter in court, and they just got the quotes from the council, although it seems a bit small beer for a big city newspaper.

But if it did all originate from Wolverhampton Council, it kind of contradicts something I said above.

But I'm hoping no-one will notice 8-[


Cabbie who illegally picked up customers faces losing his licence

https://www.expressandstar.com/news/cri ... fined-576/

A cabbie who illegally picked up passengers who had not pre-booked looks set to lose his licence.

Known as plying for hire, picking up passengers who have not pre-booked with the operator invalidates their insurance and is thus illegal.

Kobina Badu was caught plying for hire in a joint operation by Wolverhampton Council and Telford & Wrekin Council’s licensing teams in November 2022.

Badu agreed to give two undercover Telford & Wrekin Council officers a lift after they approached his Go Carz vehicle near The Parade in Wellington in the early hours of November 27 last year.

Council prosecutor Hafsa Khatun told Telford Magistrates Court that Badu was licensed by Wolverhampton City Council as a private hire operator, meaning he was only permitted to carry passengers on pre-booked journeys.

Badu pleaded guilty to the offence of plying for hire and another charge of driving with no insurance, as his policy would have been invalidated.

Ms Khatun said the council’s enforcement team had been taking part in a joint operation with West Mercia Police on the night in question.

She told the court the undercover council staff approached Badu’s car at 2.16am, and he agreed to take them to a nearby hotel for £15.

Once in the vehicle, the passengers sent messages to police colleagues to alert them, and Badu was pulled over a few minutes into the journey. He was instructed to follow the police car to the hotel where the operation was based

During the journey, Ms Khatun said Badu pleaded with the passengers to tell the police they were friends of his.

Upon arriving in the hotel car park, he was questioned and accepted he knew he was not licensed or insured to pick up fares that were not booked.

An email from Badu’s solicitor was read to the court, saying Badu had worked as a taxi driver since coming to the UK in 2017 and had “never done this before”.

It said he was now likely to have his private hire licence revoked, which would have a “significant impact” on his family as he was the sole earner in his household and had four children.

The letter added: “He really regrets his actions. He has never done this before.”

Addressing the magistrates, Badu said he had finished for the night and the hotel was on his route home, so he agreed to take the passengers as he thought they were visitors to the area who did not know the way.

He said: “I am not a bad person.”

The 42-year-old cabbie from Majestic Way in Aqueduct, Telford, was issued a conditional discharge for six months.

He has also been ordered to pay £576 and had six penalty points added to his driving licence. The licence is now subject to review and may be revoked.

Councillor Craig Collingswood, Wolverhampton Council cabinet member for environment and climate change, said: “Public Safety is of paramount importance to us.

“Partnership working with our licensing colleagues and other agencies shows our commitment to upholding our responsibilities; we expect drivers and vehicles licensed by us to always maintain the highest standards.

“This is irrespective of the administrative boundary within which they are operating at any particular time.

"Wolverhampton Council takes its enforcement responsibilities seriously and our officers are out across the country, every Friday and Saturday night, working to protect the public.”

Councillor Richard Overton, deputy leader of Telford and Wrekin Council and cabinet member for homes and enforcement said: “These cases show Telford & Wrekin Council is determined to keep cracking down on taxi drivers who break the law and potentially put passengers at risk.

“Plying for hire is a serious offence. It means that if a driver has picked up a fare that has not been pre-booked and they are involved in an accident, they will not have valid insurance.

“We know most licensed drivers operate legitimately but there are those who think they can make extra money by ignoring the rules.

“The council will continue to tackle plying for hire by carrying out operations. We will not hesitate to bring court proceedings which could lead to a driver paying a fine and having their licence suspended. It’s not worth the risk.”

The safest way to use a private hire taxi is to book directly with the operator. This means a customer will be driven by a licensed, insured driver in a licensed, insured vehicle.

It also means there will be a record of their journey, the driver and the vehicle used so it can be traced if necessary.

Telford and Wrekin Council is also hosting a survey about taxi safety and currently inviting people to submit their views.

The council encourages people to report concerns about taxi drivers and vehicles which are licensed by the authority. This can be done online via the Telford and Wrekin Council website.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 3:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Quote:
Council prosecutor Hafsa Khatun told Telford Magistrates Court that Badu was licensed by Wolverhampton City Council as a private hire operator, meaning he was only permitted to carry passengers on pre-booked journeys.

Probably not :?

Quote:
An email from Badu’s solicitor was read to the court, saying Badu had worked as a taxi driver since coming to the UK in 2017 and had “never done this before”.

Aye, right :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
StuartW wrote:
Not sure about the involvement of 'print setters' either - think you're showing your age, there :wink:

They don't get letters on print metal, assemble them in print boxes and mount them in the presses.

They do sit at a computer and compile it all for the Print Run.

Those that do that job glory in the job title of "Print Setter".

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2023 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
An email from Badu’s solicitor was read to the court, saying Badu had worked as a taxi driver since coming to the UK in 2017 and had “never done this before”.

Image

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 853 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group