Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

London driver falsely claimed £100k in bounce back loans
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=40711
Page 1 of 1

Author:  StuartW [ Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:26 pm ]
Post subject:  London driver falsely claimed £100k in bounce back loans

Not clear whether he's HC or PH...but I'd more likely guess the latter if he also had a delivery gig going on.

I'd guess there's a lot of this went on (although this seems quite small beer), but as long as the loan is repaid then nothing will happen...

This is an official HM Government press release from the Insolvency Service.

Anyone who feels the need to visit the links at the bottom will have to go via the link at the top :lol:


London taxi driver hit with 11-year sanctions after falsely claiming two covid loans

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/lond ... ovid-loans

Ilford taxi and delivery driver claimed £100,000 of Bounce Back Loans and failed to spend the money on his businesses

    Hafiz Saeed Ahmad, of Ilford, overstated the turnover for two businesses to falsely claim a total of £100,000 from the covid loan scheme

    Ahmad claimed the maximum loan of £50,000 each for his taxi and delivery businesses

    He failed to use the money for the economic support of the businesses

A taxi driver from Ilford in East London must abide by 11 years of tough bankruptcy restrictions after falsely claiming two Bounce Back Loans totalling £100,000 during the covid pandemic.

Hafiz Saeed Ahmad, 47, from Meath Road in Ilford, applied for two separate Bounce Back Loans for his delivery business, Sanwal Deliveries and Distribution, and for his taxi company, both based in East London.

He became bankrupt in February 2024 and the official receiver, whose role includes investigating the cause of a bankruptcy, discovered that Ahmad had overstated the turnover of both businesses to claim more money than each was entitled to under the rules of the scheme.

Samantha Crook, Deputy Official Receiver at the Insolvency Service, said:

"Hafiz Ahmad abused taxpayers’ money not once, but twice, taking out two separate loans based on false information, claiming more money than his businesses were entitled to receive.

"These long-lasting restrictions will help to protect people from financial wrongdoing by limiting Ahmad’s access to credit and making others aware that there are sanctions against him."

The investigation found that Ahmad had claimed £50,000 for his delivery business in July 2020– the maximum allowed under the scheme. He applied for a second £50,000 loan – this time for his taxi business – in September 2020.

The official receiver also discovered that Ahmad had failed to use the loan money for the economic benefit of either of his trading businesses – a breach of the scheme’s conditions.

The rules of the Bounce Back Loan scheme allowed businesses to claim up to 25% of their 2019 turnover, with a maximum loan of £50,000. The money had to be used for the economic benefit of the business.

The official receiver secured an 11-year Bankruptcy Restrictions Undertaking (BRU) from Ahmad, in which he did not dispute that he had obtained a £50,000 Bounce Back Loan for each of his businesses by overstating their levels of turnover and that he had not used the loans for the economic benefit of his trading businesses.

The undertaking extends his original bankruptcy restrictions from the standard 12 months until 19 August 2035.

Bankruptcy restrictions ban Ahmad from acting as a company director without the court’s permission and from borrowing more than £500 without declaring that he is subject to the restrictions. They also prevent him from holding certain roles in public organisations.

The Secretary of State for Business and Trade accepted the Bankruptcy Restrictions Undertaking from Hafiz Ahmad on 20 August 2024.
Further Information

    Hafiz Ahamd is of Meath Road, Ilford. His date of birth is June 1977.

    Further guidance about Bankruptcy Restrictions Orders and Undertakings 

    Details of BRO and BRU restrictions relating to individuals can be found on the Individual Insolvency Register

Author:  captain cab [ Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: London driver falsely claimed £100k in bounce back loans

Quote:
Not clear whether he's HC or PH...but I'd more likely guess the latter if he also had a delivery gig going on.


TP have him down as a PH driver :wink:

Author:  StuartW [ Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: London driver falsely claimed £100k in bounce back loans

Aye, they normally assume PH if it's unclear and it's bad news :lol:

Author:  captain cab [ Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: London driver falsely claimed £100k in bounce back loans

StuartW wrote:
Aye, they normally assume PH if it's unclear and it's bad news :lol:


:lol:

Author:  Sussex [ Thu Aug 22, 2024 7:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: London driver falsely claimed £100k in bounce back loans

Didn't these loans have to accord with previous tax returns?

I'm quite sure I was told the maximum I could borrow, and it was a million miles from fifty grand.

Author:  edders23 [ Thu Aug 22, 2024 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: London driver falsely claimed £100k in bounce back loans

Sussex wrote:
Didn't these loans have to accord with previous tax returns?

I'm quite sure I was told the maximum I could borrow, and it was a million miles from fifty grand.



Rishi sunak was guaranteeing them so the banks weren't bothering checking the details properly

Author:  grandad [ Fri Aug 23, 2024 7:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: London driver falsely claimed £100k in bounce back loans

Sussex wrote:
Didn't these loans have to accord with previous tax returns?

I'm quite sure I was told the maximum I could borrow, and it was a million miles from fifty grand.

You could borrow up to 25% of your turnover. I heard of drivers around ny area that just applied for a sum that had no bearing on their turnover and got it. There were very few, if any checks carried out at the time so it was just seen as easy money. I also heard of some who allegedly claimed the grants for being a business and paying business rates when they weren't and getting the grants, again without many, if any checks at the time. At the time our office was in a large office block and business rates were include in the rent so we did not qualify for the grants. Although we did apply for what was called a discretionary grant for businesses that fell inton the same category and we did get a total of 3 grants on that scheme but we had tgo provide a lot of paaperwork to evidence our turnover and other stuff and show where the money was going.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/