Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 4:31 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2024 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18532
Obviously the Suzy Lamplugh Trust has been campaigning on this kind of thing for years now, but there's maybe a nod towards the Wolverhampton issue here, but it's not stated specifically. But clearly the cross-border thing is portrayed as a major problem here, not to mention the related issue in differences in 'fit and proper' approaches by different licensing authorities.

Don't know if it's purely coincidental, but obviously this will help momentum towards parliamentary action to sort it all out, although not sure if there's been much media coverage of the stuff below. This is on the Independent's website, and the BBC has also covered it :?


Scores of taxi drivers given licenses despite having convictions for violent offences

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 41171.html

Mother and brother of Sian O’Callaghan - who was killed by Christopher Halliwell after getting into his taxi - tell of their ‘devastating’ loss

Scores of taxi drivers have been able to obtain licenses despite having convictions for violent offences, a charity has found.

Data obtained following a Freedom of Information (FOI) request reveals drivers with convictions, including for violent crimes like assault, battery and harassment, have still been given licences even though licensing authorities are aware of the offences they committed.

The Suzy Lamplugh Trust, a leading anti-stalking and harassment charity which unearthed the figures, warned women are being placed at risk when sharing cars with drivers who have a history of violence as they urged ministers to overhaul the law.

Researchers, who received responses from 28 local authorities, estimated 90 licences were given to drivers with convictions for violent offences, while an extra 68 were granted to drivers who have a range of traffic, driving or vehicle related convictions such as drink driving and reckless driving.

The mother and brother of Sian O’Callaghan - who was killed by Christopher Halliwell after getting into his taxi when leaving a nightclub in Swindon in 2011 - told The Independent about their “devastating” loss.

Halliwell is serving a whole life term for the murders of 22-year-old Ms O’Callaghan in March 2011 and 20-year-old sex worker Becky Godden in January 2003.

Research by YouGov and Suzy Lamplugh Trust found three in ten of more than 4,200 adults they polled feel unsafe when using taxis - with seven in ten saying they would feel less at risk if the law was changed so drivers with a history of aggressive or abusive behaviour cannot get a licence.

Elaine Pickford, the mother of Ms O’Callaghan, recalled the “devastating” moment they were told her daughter’s body had been found.

“13 years on, the more time that passes for me personally, the more time I’m aware that she hasn’t lived and where she would be now if she had of - what life she would have had,” she added.

Recalling the period when her daughter was missing, she said: “Most of us weren’t sleeping or grabbing sleep for very short times here and there. And it was such a fast pace.”

“You’re just running on whatever you can run on, really, and it’s hard to put into words what that is, because for everybody it’s a bit different I suppose. You’re thrown into complete and utter chaos and just getting through every minute the best you can.”

Sian’s brother Liam O’Callaghan said: “It’s always challenging. The thing is you never fully get over what’s happened and the sense of loss. But you just build around it”.

Ms Pickford and Mr O’Callaghan were involved in campaigning for the Taxi and Private Hire Vehicles Act 2022 that led to improved sharing of data between local authorities on drivers.

The Suzy Lamplugh Trust called for the government to urgently roll out legislation that establishes national minimum standards for licences for drivers as well as regulating drivers like professions such as teaching so background checks are more stringent.

Researchers warned it is tricky to properly grasp the scale of the problem due to licencing authorities not telling them how many of their currently licenced drivers hold convictions and for which offences.

“You are getting in a vehicle with a stranger, not knowing anything about their previous history,” Saskia Garner, of the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, told The Independent. “And they can lock you in, and they can take you wherever they want.”

Discussing the murder of Ms O’Callaghan, she added: “Sian got into that vehicle doing the thing that every woman is told to do, which is ‘Get a taxi home, don’t walk down a dark road’.”

She said current rules mean individual authorities can make up their own mind about what constitutes a safe driver.

“Given that the drivers can go to anywhere in the country, obtain a license, and then go and operate somewhere completely different, you can’t be sure that any driver has been vetted appropriately,” Ms O’Callaghan said.

“If the checks are the same on every single driver then people will be reassured that the highest standards are being applied whichever driver they go with.”

Jim Button, president of the Institute of Licensing, said “There is no doubt that the standards applied by licensing authorities in relation to determining whether a person is safe and suitable to be a taxi driver vary hugely across England and Wales.

“The Institute of Licensing supports calls for legislation in this area. In the meantime, it encourages all licensing authorities to adopt the guidelines published by the Institute of Licensing.

“It is vital that applicants’ and licensees’ history of concerning behaviour is taken into account by licensing authorities: they should have a clear policy detailing which crimes and behaviours will result in licence refusal or revocation, and that should be adhered to.”

A spokesperson for the Department for Transport said “keeping passengers safe is the top priority”, adding that drivers in England already have to undergo the “highest-level background checks”.

The representative added: “Before deciding to issue a licence, authorities must consult a national database which logs if someone has had a licence refused, suspended, or revoked. We are also currently considering further options to improve safety around taxi licensing.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2024 12:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18532
James Button wrote:
“The Institute of Licensing supports calls for legislation in this area. In the meantime, it encourages all licensing authorities to adopt the guidelines published by the Institute of Licensing."

Maybe the problem with adopting the IoL's guidelines is that they were so over the top in some regards the LAs didn't pay much attention to them? :-o

By the same token, a bit of deflection from the DfT at the end of the article there - consulting the national database is all very well, but as the article makes clear there's no obligation on LAs simply to follow the approach of other authorities.

And that's assuming the applicant has even been revoked or suspended elsewhere in the first place :?

Presumably the vast majority of the worst drivers and applicants haven't been licensed by another authority...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2024 12:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18532
Anyway, this is the official SLT news release, which contains a good bit more detail, if anyone feels the need. Would have pasted this instead of the article above, but it would take a bit more work to make it look faithful to its original presentation on here in terms of layout, formatting etc:

Government action required as licences still being held by taxi and private hire vehicle drivers with convictions for violent offences

https://www.suzylamplugh.org/News/press ... y-day-2024


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2024 12:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
The woman on the BBC this morning missed a trick. When talking about the cross border issue she said a Manchester driver working in Essex when she should have said a Wolverhampton driver working anywhere in the country except Wolverhampton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2024 7:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
The blame for this lies clearly with those who issue and oversee the licensing function (licensing officers and Councillors)

The power to refuse is already in their hands but most are only interested in collecting fees from one and all

Overall the trade does not want anyone who is of a dodgy character to obtain a license of any kind whether it be for a driver,operator or vehicle proprietor.

Council Officials think they know everything when they clearly do not.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sussex and 525 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group