Taxi Driver Online

Echoes of my own manor here

And, predictably, the headline is selective because it focuses on the worst period of the year, rather than the year as a whole, which has a failure rate of 26.7%

So that's worse than ours in East Fife, but not as bad as many elsewhere

And maybe also instructive in terms of narrative framing and the like that it's the failure rates that are cited here, as opposed to the pass rates in Fife.

But maybe that's explainable in terms of the optics - for the press headlines and the like, it's better to portray a 100% pass rate in some of the Fife zones, as opposed to a 0% failure rate


Fears 'dangerous' vehicles are driving around Kirklees as 40% of taxis fail annual test

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/wes ... d-31987846

In any one month in 2024/25, between 25 and 42 percent of vehicles taking the council's compliance test failed

Up to 42 per cent of taxis are failing Kirklees Council's compliance test each month, raising concerns there are 'dangerous' vehicles on the roads.

A report to today’s (July 3) meeting of Kirklees Council’s Licensing and Safety Committee provided an update on the work of the local authority’s licensing services. Detailed within this was information around compliance testing for private hire vehicles and hackney carriages.

All vehicles which are to be licensed by the council have to undergo annual compliance testing and can be subject to up to three vehicle compliance tests per year for safety and condition reasons when required. The council’s Public Protection Group Leader for Licensing, Fiona Goldsmith, likened the test to an MOT but taking into account additional measures such as vehicle condition checks.

Vehicles can fail for majors or minors. If the reason for failure is regarded to be a minor, drivers are given a period of time to rectify the issue and take the vehicle back for a free test, the meeting heard. Major failures can see a vehicle licence suspended and a full retest, with the licence holder footing the bill.

According to the report, 2,445 tests were carried out between April 1, 2024 and March 31, 2025 across the council’s George Street and Vine Street premises. Of these, 653, or 26.71 per cent, failed. In April 2024, 42 per cent of the 185 vehicles that were tested, failed, with this being the highest level for the period.

The most common reason for failure was lighting (308 vehicles), followed by steering/suspension (171 vehicles), wheels/tyres (152 vehicles) and then brakes (119 vehicles).

Councillor Charles Greaves (Independent, Holme Valley North) said: “Some of the reasons given for failure - it’s a bit disappointing that those have been picked up on in annual compliance checks rather than in ongoing, periodic checks by the driver or the firm. Stuff like suspension, steering, brakes, conditions of tyres and wheels - really the driver should be checking those every time they’re going out.

“I notice it’s an annual check until the vehicle is five years old and then it goes on to twice annual but that leaves an awful lot of time where there might be dangerous vehicles on the road waiting for the council to check them.”

Councillor Greaves wanted to know what the council’s expectation was on taxi drivers and companies to undertake their own tests and checks on vehicles on a regular basis. In response, Ms Goldsmith explained that the council no longer has a restriction on the number of tests increasing due to vehicle age - as was previously agreed by the committee - with all vehicles being tested annually.

She said: “Yes, they [taxi drivers] are supposed to do their own checks - quite honestly, everybody’s supposed to do their own checks when they get in a vehicle before they go - but yes the onus is supposed to be on the drivers to do their own checks and keep a record that they’ve done the checks.”

Councillor Eric Firth said: “I understand where you’re coming from. Obviously some of the drivers or operators clearly see this as a once a year test and they’re not keeping up with maintenance as they should but that’s not all drivers is it?”

Ms Goldsmith explained that it is a “minority” of vehicles and a “minority” of drivers with the council keeping an eye on the vehicles and proactively looking at them. She said: “If we happen upon a vehicle that just doesn’t look quite right we can require them to go for an additional test. We can make them go for up to three a year.”

Thanks for the clarification and detail


What's not to like about these superhuman councillors? They can perform MoT-standard tests on cars and pick up suspension and brake faults and the like every time they jump in the car

So why does any car in the UK ever fail an MoT?

Anyway, although there are parallels with recent coverage from my own gaff, it's slightly more, er, restrained, and not quite so judgemental

I'm not sure my manor would be able to collate these kinds of inspection stats. A situation I'm quite sure is not unique.

We have about ten garages authorised to test local taxi/PHVs. If a vehicle fails, then the driver is given a tick sheet with the failures, but I'm almost certain the council never gets a copy of that.

All they see are the follow-up test tick sheets when they relicense vehicles.

_________________
IDFIMH