Taxi Driver Online

Nothing spectacularly new here, except that it's maybe a bit odd for a licensing chair to sing Uber's praises.

Usual technical deficiencies in the article, though


Taxi laws 'unfair to local operators' says councillor

https://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/25 ... ouncillor/

TAXI laws need reform in order to improve passenger safety in Worcester, a senior councillor has said.

Richard Udall, chair of Worcester City Council’s licensing committee, is calling for “local regulation and control”.

He said the legislation around taxis and private hire care is “contradictory and often out of date - some of the laws date back to 1869”.

Worcester, as a licensing authority, is responsible for regulating taxis and private hire vehicles in the city.

But legislation is set by the Government and licensed taxi drivers can operate anywhere in England and Wales - not only the district where they got their licence.

“The most recent change in the law, which was passed in the Deregulation Act 2015, allowed private hire companies to sub-contract bookings to vehicles licensed in other local authorities,” said Cllr Udall.

“This has enabled City of Wolverhampton Council to license 50,000 private hire drivers, who now operate nationwide.”

The law change also allowed app-based services like Uber to operate in the UK.

Cllr Udall said: “I welcome Uber, they do a good job, they are popular and local residents are happy to use them, but they can only be booked in advance, they cannot use local taxi ranks and cannot ply for hire - this has caused problems, confusion and tensions.

“I believe we should be able to regulate and determine who can operate private hire vehicles in Worcester and not rely on enforcement and regulation from Wolverhampton.

“More than half of our private hire cars are now licensed elsewhere, posing a safety risk to passengers and making it unfair to locally licensed operators.

“We have our own standards, based on local knowledge and local requirements. We need local regulation and control.

“I support Uber, the consumer likes the flexibility, but we need to be sure their operators in Worcester meet our local standards and their cars are fit for purpose.

“We need to re-take control and we need a change in the law to do so, this is required to ensure passenger safety and to protect the public from unscrupulous drivers and operators.”

Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham has called for the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, currently going through Parliament, to be amended to cover the issue.

Cllr Udall added: “I have asked Worcester MP Tom Collins to support such an amendment, so we can make the necessary changes to help local authorities make the changes needed.”

We have asked Tom Collins for comment.

Strictly speaking, the Act allowed private hire operators to subcontract to private hire operators licensed in other authorities, not to vehicles.

Which may sound pedantic, but it always makes it sound like it's operators and vehicle from outside the area, but more often than not it's just a local operator using Wolverhampton as a convenient badging and plating authority.


That's slightly more obviously nonsense - makes it sound like Uber couldn't have worked in the UK without the 2015 Act. Which is not only factually incorrect, but maybe suggests to the casual reader that the law was changed at Uber's behest or convenience...

another dumb councillor who has been economical in his research before opening his mouth

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector

I'm guessing these comments form part of the council's submissions to the Transport Committee.

Given that, I think he is trying to portray a more balanced response.

_________________
IDFIMH