Reasonably predictable results here, I'd guess.
But the suggested cost of the CCTV system seems on the low side
Driver opposition over introducing mandatory CCTV in taxis
https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/2586178 ... ctv-taxis/
Drivers and members of the public are split over council plans to make CCTV mandatory in licensed taxi vehicles.
Arun District Council could be moving forward with plans to require the cameras, after a report into the issue suggested the council progress with the policy.
The decision follows a public consultation carried out in November 2025, which drew 184 responses.
Just under half, 47 per cent, supported the idea, while 42 per cent were against, and 11 per cent were unsure.
However, within this, drivers and members of the public are dramatically split on the issue.
74 per cent of respondents identifying as drivers responded 'no' to mandatory cameras, while an equal percentage of public respondents voted 'yes'.
Those who responded 'no' to the plans primarily cited concerns over cost and privacy.
Officers estimate the installation would cost around £555 per vehicle, or £24 per month to rent, and believe the cost is reasonable given the potential for improved safeguarding.
A report into the issue suggested that the mandating of CCTV would increase safety to both parties, reducing the risk of criminality, and adding protection for drivers against unfounded complaints.
The district currently licences around 240 hackney carriages and private hire vehicles.
Most licensing authorities across Sussex have already made CCTV a requirement in taxis.
Brighton and Hove City Council has enforced the use of CCTV in all taxis and private hire vehicles in the city since 2010.
A report into the issue is due to be considered by the council on February 27.
