Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 7:16 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2026 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18523
Bit of a non-story this, and nothing new about drivers huffing and puffing like this, and no direct evidence that it's all related to the VAT thing. It's probably more to do with the usual commission stuff, that's been brought into focus by the clarification of the contractual terms. Which really just clarifies that Uber will be like any other platform (legacy or app-only) outside London.

And that latter point is the funny thing - when I saw this was in City AM I assumed it was about the London stuff, but it's actually about the rest of England.

And, I mean, it's just swerving the 'taxi tax' in the way all the rest of the Deltas and Veezus have always been doing, and are continuing to do [-(


Uber drivers plot exodus as platform swerves ‘taxi tax’

https://www.cityam.com/uber-drivers-plo ... -taxi-tax/

Uber is staring down the barrel of a potential driver exodus as members of its fleet threaten to jump ship to rival apps or return to black cabs, following a new year contractual overhaul designed to swerve a huge VAT bill.

Documents seen by City AM show a wave of fury in private messaging groups, with drivers urging colleagues to reject new terms that they claim turn them into “tax collectors” for the platform.

This follows the removal of the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS), which came into effect on 2 January.

TOMS is a niche tax break the Treasury previously estimated would net £700m a year for the public purse if closed.

Messages seen by City AM have revealed that drivers are increasingly looking at rival platforms or local minicab firms, with many calling for a “mass log off”, and protests outside parliament to contest the change.

‘No changes’ will be made for drivers

But Uber remains bullish and maintains that the transition is a necessary alignment with the rest of the UK market.

The market leading company confirmed today that it is not seeing any disruption to services and that the update simply moves its regional operations to an ‘agent’ business model.

This is the standard practice for almost all private hire operators outside of London.

By repositioning itself as a booking agent rather than a principal transport provider, Uber ensures that VAT only applies to its own service fee rather than the full fare.

And as most drivers earn below the £90,000 VAT registration threshold, this move keeps prices competitive for passengers, by avoiding a 20 per cent price hike.

Uber insists that the change is a direct response to government policy aimed at keeping essential everyday transport affordable.

Addressing concerns over take-home pay, Uber clarified that the new terms do not change the portion of the fare the platform keeps.

It also insisted that they have not introduced variable commission as a result of the model change.

Screenshots seen by City AM showing varying service fees are, according to Uber, part of its dynamic marketplace practice designed to balance supply and demand.

The ride-hailing firm notes that its service fee can drop as low as three per cent on some fares to attract passengers during poor weather or off-peak hours.

This increases the total number of earning opportunities for those on the app.

Keeping its drivers

Uber is leaning heavily on its status as the only major player in the sector to designate all UK drivers as ‘workers’.

This classification, held through an agreement with the GMB Union, guarantees a suite of benefits that traditional self-employed drivers lack.

This includes a guaranteed national living wage, holiday pay based on 12.07 per cent of earnings paid out weekly in cash, and a pension plan with contributions from Uber.

The firm also highlighted that drivers have access to free sickness and injury protection, parental payments, and free university courses.

An Uber spokesperson said the vast majority of total fares go directly into drivers’ pockets and that the company is proud that thousands of drivers continue to make the positive choice to work on the platform as passenger demand continues to grow.

“All drivers receive a weekly summary of their earnings, which shows exactly what Uber and the driver received from trips”, they told City AM.

“We are proud that thousands of drivers continue to make the positive choice to work on Uber as passenger demand and trips continue to grow.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2026 10:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18523
Quote:
Messages seen by City AM have revealed that drivers are increasingly looking at rival platforms or local minicab firms...

Twas ever thus... :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2026 10:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18523
City AM wrote:
Uber is staring down the barrel of a potential driver exodus as members of its fleet threaten to jump ship to rival apps or return to black cabs, following a new year contractual overhaul designed to swerve a huge VAT bill.

That's what looked particularly odd while I still thought the article was about London - as if there's a huge number of former London black cab drivers who jumped ship to drive a minicab with Uber, and are now considering a reverse ferret :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 13, 2026 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
An Uber spokesperson said the vast majority of total fares go directly into drivers’ pockets

I don't think so. [-X

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2026 12:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20857
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Sussex wrote:
Quote:
An Uber spokesperson said the vast majority of total fares go directly into drivers’ pockets

I don't think so. [-X



the definition of majority is more than 50% :wink:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2026 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Quote:
An Uber spokesperson said the vast majority of total fares go directly into drivers’ pockets

I don't think so. [-X



the definition of majority is more than 50% :wink:

They are saying 'vast' majority.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 278 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group