Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Carlisle taxi boss losses license
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4762
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Sussex [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Carlisle taxi boss losses license

No not that one. :-s

http://www.cumberland-news.co.uk/news/v ... ?id=430834

Author:  GMB Branch secretary [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Carlisle

Smart move "i was concentrating guv" you couldnt make it up could you.Hes a cabby FFS,obviously didnt need any advice,smart lot in CARLISLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ORGANISE EDUCATE AGITATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author:  captain cab [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
Smart move "i was concentrating guv" you couldnt make it up could you.Hes a cabby FFS,obviously didnt need any advice,smart lot in CARLISLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You dont know a lot about the circumstances before you pass judgement.

CC

Author:  GMB Branch secretary [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:01 pm ]
Post subject:  carlisle

WELL POST THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author:  GBC [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Carlisle

GMB Branch secretary wrote:
obviously didnt need any advice


Certainly not from the clowns you call GMB lawyers. Image

Author:  captain cab [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:27 am ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
WELL POST THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Errm, thats not for me to do, but also not of you to cast aspersions of

CC

Author:  GMB Branch secretary [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 3:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Carlisle

Capt press report states he pleaded lack of concentration,not the smartest move,once the CLLRS listen to that they didnt have a lot of choice.I note the chap had just lost his father,when suffering bereavment
most people would not be in a fit condition to deal with authorities,therefore i think he should have adjourned,or been represented.We always advise representation,through lack of it this chap MIGHT have unjustifiably lost his livlihood.
ORGANISE EDUCATE AGITATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author:  GMB Branch secretary [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 3:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Carlisle

Capt press report states he pleaded lack of concentration,not the smartest move,once the CLLRS listen to that they didnt have a lot of choice.I note the chap had just lost his father,when suffering bereavment
most people would not be in a fit condition to deal with authorities,therefore i think he should have adjourned,or been represented.We always advise representation,through lack of it this chap MIGHT have unjustifiably lost his livlihood.
ORGANISE EDUCATE AGITATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author:  captain cab [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
Capt press report states he pleaded lack of concentration,not the smartest move,once the CLLRS listen to that they didnt have a lot of choice.I note the chap had just lost his father,when suffering bereavment
most people would not be in a fit condition to deal with authorities,therefore i think he should have adjourned,or been represented.We always advise representation,through lack of it this chap MIGHT have unjustifiably lost his livlihood.


You know f*ck all about the circumstances, and I'm not going to tell you, but dont be so fast at casting a guilty verdict.

CC

Author:  TDO [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wise words there CC, Terry should leave that to the relevant authorities.

But wait a minute, the authorities HAVE cast a guilty verdict :lol: #-o

Author:  captain cab [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:29 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
But wait a minute, the authorities HAVE cast a guilty verdict


and there are still a number of days available to make an appeal to the same magistrates who allowed him to keep his license in the first place :shock:

CC

Author:  TDO [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

But the point is that he HAS got loadsa points on his license, he DID fail to disclose things to the LA within the specified period, he DID fail to disclose things on a disclosure form and the committee DID think fit to revoke his licenses.

Thus is it really approrpriate to criticise people for casting a guilty verdict?

As for any appeal, if there are mitigating circumstances then fine, but will it look too clever if he claims some factor that he didn't disclose to the committee? The fact that he didn't will hardly enhance his credibility?

Author:  captain cab [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
But the point is that he HAS got loadsa points on his license, he DID fail to disclose things to the LA within the specified period, he DID fail to disclose things on a disclosure form and the committee DID think fit to revoke his licenses.

Thus is it really approrpriate to criticise people for casting a guilty verdict?

As for any appeal, if there are mitigating circumstances then fine, but will it look too clever if he claims some factor that he didn't disclose to the committee? The fact that he didn't will hardly enhance his credibility?


This LA has banned two drivers in the last 8 months and lost both times in front of the magistrates upon appeal.

Neath Port Talbot vs. Wathan was very handy on both occasions. I rather suspect the guy will make it a hat trick.

CC

Author:  TDO [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well so be it, but whatever happens it presumably won't affect his guilt, merely the consequences therefrom.

Author:  captain cab [ Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
Well so be it, but whatever happens it presumably won't affect his guilt, merely the consequences therefrom.


He has already been found guilty and the magistrates decided to allow him to continue to drive, the LA dont consider him fit and proper, one obviously contradicts the other and I think we know who has the final say in the right of appeal.

CC

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/