Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 10:21 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Draft Transport Bill
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:50 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
It may be of interest to some that the DfT are proposing to allow PH to act as taxi buses (clause 26).

Not sure how that can happen, but hey ho. :-k

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/localtransportbill/

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Draft Transport Bill
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
It may be of interest to some that the DfT are proposing to allow PH to act as taxi buses (clause 26).

Not sure how that can happen, but hey ho. :-k

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/localtransportbill/


“Taxi-bus” services

3.46 At present, taxi owners are eligible to apply for a “special restricted” PSV operator’s licence, specifically to enable them to register and operate local bus services. As a further measure to assist community-based transport, the draft Bill includes a provision to extend similar eligibility to holders of a private hire vehicle (PHV) licence (clause 26). This would apply in England and Wales (including London).


I have no doubt that this will happen and when it does I have no doubt that bus companies will feel the pinch. Anyone operating such a service automatically qualifies for the BSOG grant, which I believe comes under section 154 of the Transport Act 2000. I can see it as a welcome additional revenue provider for private hire drivers in large cities that have a restricted numbers policy. The scheme has been unsuccessful as far as hackney carriages are concerned.

There may be opportunities in this bill for some amendments to erroneous hackney carriage legislation, we have until september to respond.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 2:30 pm 
This is a proposal designed to change the face of our nation forever.

Unsurprisingly for an intrusive Labour government the measures proposed will permit a personal surveillance system that makes "1984" look like baby stuff.

Be warned!!!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Draft Transport Bill
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 253
Location: Crawley
JD wrote:
Sussex wrote:
It may be of interest to some that the DfT are proposing to allow PH to act as taxi buses (clause 26).

Not sure how that can happen, but hey ho. :-k

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/localtransportbill/


“Taxi-bus” services

3.46 At present, taxi owners are eligible to apply for a “special restricted” PSV operator’s licence, specifically to enable them to register and operate local bus services. As a further measure to assist community-based transport, the draft Bill includes a provision to extend similar eligibility to holders of a private hire vehicle (PHV) licence (clause 26). This would apply in England and Wales (including London).


I have no doubt that this will happen and when it does I have no doubt that bus companies will feel the pinch. Anyone operating such a service automatically qualifies for the BSOG grant, which I believe comes under section 154 of the Transport Act 2000. I can see it as a welcome additional revenue provider for private hire drivers in large cities that have a restricted numbers policy. The scheme has been unsuccessful as far as hackney carriages are concerned.

There may be opportunities in this bill for some amendments to erroneous hackney carriage legislation, we have until september to respond.

Regards

JD


As I understand the law, councils are currently specifically forbidden from limiting the number of PHV drivers

_________________
Our safety is Paramount


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Draft Transport Bill
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
allo allo wrote:
As I understand the law, councils are currently specifically forbidden from limiting the number of PHV drivers


I wasn't aware I said private hire licenses were restricted? I did state restricted numbers, but I would have thought by now that everyone in the taxi trade would know the meaning of restricted numbers?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Draft Transport Bill
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 253
Location: Crawley
JD wrote:
allo allo wrote:
As I understand the law, councils are currently specifically forbidden from limiting the number of PHV drivers


I wasn't aware I said private hire licenses were restricted? I did state restricted numbers, but I would have thought by now that everyone in the taxi trade would know the meaning of restricted numbers?

Regards

JD


I believe it was the juxtaposition of "private hire" and "restricted numbers policy" in the same sentence that gave me that impression.

Or maybe I was just being a smart alec, :wink:

_________________
Our safety is Paramount


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 6:05 am
Posts: 63
Location: Hastings E Sussex
For the Public. may be a good thing. Conquest hospital is 3-4 miles ou of town and no bus service after 6pm. So both staff and visiting relatives are stuffed. bus service up and down. Usually get fares from people standing at bus stops for over an hour for a non-existent bus. Don't read the timetable - means nothing. Special taxi buses picking up from hospital at end of visitors time and staff shifts would be a nice little earner with a few taking different routes to different estates.

OK it it Undoing the fabric of Society as we know ita nd the world will never be the same. But may gain where taxis lose by council putting on special buses at night 20 yrds from taxi rank. Know bus companies struggling and losing by running big empty buses. May be easier to get a system of taxi buses like Israel where you get in the with others and get dropped off as the driver plans his route according to the passengers destinations.

Junie

_________________
Safety In Taxis. Website and survey.Raising awareness of safety in taxis for driver and passenger.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Junie2006 wrote:
OK it it Undoing the fabric of Society as we know it and the world will never be the same.



We live in a changing world, the problem is that many in the Taxi trade are stuck in a time warp and they cannot see that the world is evolving while they are stood still.

That's always been the case, failed people with failed ideas who would rather ruin the trade than have their vested interests watered down. The taxi trade should be dictating to the Government what it wants and not the other way around. I've never seen so many self employed individuals bowing to the diktats of councillors and Government officials.

Out with the old and in with the new, I vote in Sussex for the position of Leader of the United UK National Taxi organisation.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: JD
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 6:05 am
Posts: 63
Location: Hastings E Sussex
I am adding some "taxi" facts to my site. try and boost and change the image. Break down some prejudices. Like you say there is a damn lot of us. Can't find the actual numbers. but in small town like Hastings there are hundreds of taxi drivers if not thousands including the part-timer who do it for a bit extra. So must be 100,000s across the nation. Politically and numerically we have alot of strength. We are an asset and a support to all eh towns and communities. Accept them when the pub, club, wife and even the police are on the last warning with them. We manage a lot which most wont without backing from others or the wieght of truncheon. mace and the right to arrest, restrain and section under the mental health act. Unpaid police van, psychologist and sociologists and marriage guidance but without the money.

If anyone has any interesting "taxi" facts which I may include please let me know.

_________________
Safety In Taxis. Website and survey.Raising awareness of safety in taxis for driver and passenger.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 2:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:47 pm
Posts: 94
Location: The Gutter!
Round here 8 seater minibuses have been covering Bus Routes for years with no problems. I can't see a problem with it personally; the route is too small for the bus firm to actually put a bus on it due to costs so farm it out to a Taxi/PH and both are happy!


"Ohh its a great life on the buses...!!! Blakey? Blakey? Phew not on this one!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:17 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
Skippy71 wrote:
I can't see a problem with it personally; the route is too small for the bus firm to actually put a bus on it due to costs so farm it out to a Taxi/PH and both are happy!

I don't think anyone can TBH, and that's what the small PSV laws are made for.

But can you imagine what you would feel like if someone started a service of mondeos licensed as PSV. Put one opposite your main rank with a big f*** off touting sign in the window, and then pulled other cars from around the corner when someone wanted one. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:36 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
It's been three weeks since anyone posted on this thread, so I'm assuming everyone is happy with this bit. :-s

Clause 26: Use of private hire vehicles to provide local services

70. This clause amends sections 12 and 13 of the TA 1985. These sections currently enable holders of a taxi licence to apply to the traffic commissioner for a special restricted Public Service Vehicle ("PSV") operator's licence (granted under section 12), entitling the operator to use taxis to run local bus services. The effect of the amendments is to extend this ability to the holders of private hire vehicle ("PHV") licences, enabling them to use PHVs to provide local bus services. The amendments would allow PHVs operating in this way to pick up passengers spontaneously rather than having to be pre-booked through an operator.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
I think the reason Taxibuses have proven unsuccessful is because of the hurdles placed in the way of grants and subsidies.

This is because the issuing authority or organisation is under far to much pressure from the bus companies who are extremely defensive of these government funds they believe should only be paid to them.

But as bus deregulation has worked so well, because the bus companies face so much competition to run services they will, always, win in the end.

The buses specifically and public transport generally should have their profits returned to the public purse instead of into the pockets of shareholders.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:26 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
GA wrote:
I think the reason Taxibuses have proven unsuccessful is because of the hurdles placed in the way of grants and subsidies.

If you are happy for PH to pick up off the streets without a booking legally, then that's good enough for me. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
Sussex wrote:
GA wrote:
I think the reason Taxibuses have proven unsuccessful is because of the hurdles placed in the way of grants and subsidies.

If you are happy for PH to pick up off the streets without a booking legally, then that's good enough for me. :wink:


If they made the Taxibus process easier then the scheme would have been far more successful.

Don't forget we were in the middle of setting a Taxibus scheme up ................... something that doesn't seem to have continued since my resignation.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sussex and 247 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group